Exciting enhancements are coming soon to eCode360! Learn more 🡪
Borough of Hatboro, PA
Montgomery County
By using eCode360 you agree to be legally bound by the Terms of Use. If you do not agree to the Terms of Use, please do not use eCode360.
[Ord. 1005, 5/23/2011]
Due to the need to better define the impacts of a proposed project upon the community and surrounding environment, Hatboro Borough may require the preparation of special studies in accordance with this Part.
[Ord. 1005, 5/23/2011]
1. 
Purpose. This study and report will be used to assess the effect of a proposed subdivision, land development, or zoning change on the transportation system in Hatboro Borough. The purpose of the study is to ensure that proposed developments or zoning changes do not adversely affect the transportation network, to identify any traffic problems associated with site access, to determine traffic problems on Borough, county or state streets in the vicinity of the proposed project and to determine where future streets are required. The study also will assist in the protection of air quality, the conservation of energy, and the safety of the motoring public. The study will also present specific determination of necessary traffic control signing (i.e., stop signs, speed limit signing, warning signs, no parking signing, etc.), conforming to applicable commonwealth regulations and applicable Hatboro Borough requirements.
2. 
Conduct of Traffic Management Study. The traffic management study shall be prepared by a qualified engineer and/or transportation planner with previous traffic study experience. The requirements, procedures, and standards for a traffic management study are set forth in Subsection 4.
3. 
Definitions.
LEVEL-OF-SERVICE
This evaluation is defined in the latest version of the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, operational conditions within a traffic stream (or at an intersection approach). Level-of-service is indicated by speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. Six levels of service are defined for each type of traffic facility, ranging from A to F. Level-of-service "A" indicates free flow; level-of-service "B" indicates stable flow; level-of-service "C" indicates stable, but inhibited flow; level-of-service "D" indicates high density, restricted stable flow; level-of-service "E" indicates operation at or near capacity; and level-of-service "F" is indicative of flow breakdown.
MAJOR INTERSECTION
Any intersection, where traffic generated by the proposal will have a significant effect on the flow of traffic through the intersection. Where doubt exists, the qualified traffic engineer and/or transportation planner shall seek guidance from the Borough and/or the Borough Engineer prior to the submission of the study.
QUEUE ANALYSIS
This procedure includes the average queue and maximum queue of vehicles which will be observed in each traffic stream and intersection approach, measured in both feet and vehicles. Various statistical and/or computer models may be applied.
STUDY AREA
This area will extend along all borough, county, and state roads serving the development and will extend to all major intersections along all roads within 1/2 mile of the site involved. Where doubt exists, the qualified traffic engineer and/or transportation planner will seek guidance from Hatboro Borough and/or the Borough Engineer prior to the submission of the study.
TRIP GENERATION
The total count of trips to and from a study site per unit of land use (i.e., acres, dwelling units, etc.) as established by the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Report. For land uses not listed in this report or if information is determined through a small sample size, the qualified traffic engineer and/or transportation planner shall seek guidance from Hatboro Borough or designee prior to the submission of the study.
VOLUME/CAPACITY ANALYSIS
This procedure compares the volume of a traffic facility to its capacity. The procedure described in the latest version of the Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, Special Report 209, shall be followed.
WARRANTS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
This is a series of warrants which detail the minimum traffic volume, pedestrian volume, or other criteria necessary for the installation of a traffic signal. These criteria are contained in the most recent edition of the manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, by FHWA.
4. 
General Requirements and Standards for a Traffic Management Study. A traffic management study shall follow the outline in Subsection 4A and include information as contained in Subsection 4B.
A. 
Traffic Management Study Outline.
(1) 
Introduction.
(a) 
Site and study area boundaries.
(b) 
Existing and proposed site uses.
(c) 
Existing and proposed nearby development.
(d) 
Existing and proposed roadways and intersections.
(2) 
Analysis of Existing Conditions.
(a) 
Daily (weekday and Saturday) peak hour traffic volume.
(b) 
Volume/capacity analyses at critical points.
(c) 
Levels-of-service at critical points.
(3) 
Analysis of Future Conditions without Proposed Development.
(a) 
Daily (weekday and Saturday) peak hour traffic volume.
(b) 
Volume/capacity analyses at critical points.
(c) 
Levels of service at critical points.
(4) 
Analysis of Future Conditions with Proposed Development.
(a) 
Trip generation.
(b) 
Trip distribution.
(c) 
Traffic assignment.
(d) 
Daily (weekday and Saturday) peak hour traffic volume.
(e) 
Volume/capacity analyses at critical points.
(f) 
Levels-of-service at critical points.
(5) 
Recommended Improvements.
(a) 
Proposed recommended improvements.
(b) 
Volume/capacity analyses at critical points.
(c) 
Levels-of-service at critical points.
(6) 
Conclusions.
B. 
Traffic Management Report Guidelines. The report made after the study shall be in the following format and contain the following information unless any part of the following requirements are specifically waived by Hatboro Borough:
(1) 
Introduction. The objective of this section is to clearly identify the land use and transportation setting for the site and its surrounding area.
(a) 
Site and Study Area Boundaries. A brief description of the size, location, general terrain features, proposed land uses, construction, staging, and completion date of the proposed land development. If the development is residential, types of dwelling units, and number of bedrooms shall be included. Also, the description shall include probable socioeconomic characteristics of site users with respect to transportation needs of the site (i.e., number of senior citizens).
(b) 
Existing and Proposed Site Uses. The existing and proposed uses of the site shall be identified in terms of type and zoning classification category.
(c) 
Existing and Proposed Nearby Development. A complete description of the existing land uses in the vicinity of the site, as well as their current zoning, proposed uses for adjacent land, other major existing and proposed land development.
(d) 
Existing and Proposed Roadways and Intersections. The description shall contain full documentation of the proposed internal and existing external transportation system. This description shall include proposed internal vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation, all proposed ingress and egress location, all internal roadways (widths and rights-of-way), parking conditions, traffic channelization, and any traffic signals or other intersection control devices at all intersections within the site.
Also, locations for all signing (i.e., speed limits, etc.) shall be shown and verified.
The report shall describe the entire external roadway system within the study area. Major intersections in the study area shall be identified and illustrated. All existing and proposed public transportation services and facilities within a one mile radius of the site shall also be documented. All future highway improvements within Hatboro Borough and the study area, including proposed construction and traffic signalization, shall be noted. Improvements cited within the most recent Hatboro Borough Comprehensive Plan shall be referenced. Improvements from the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission's three-year Transportation Improvement Program and PennDOT's twelve-year State Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), within Hatboro Borough and the study area, shall also be noted. Any proposed, or in-place roadway improvements due to proposed surrounding developments shall be noted.
(2) 
Analysis of Existing Conditions. This section shall describe the results of the volume/capacity analysis to be completed for the roadways and intersections in the study area under existing conditions as well as any data collection efforts that are required.
(a) 
Daily and Peak Hour Volumes. Schematic diagrams shall be presented depicting existing traffic (ADT), the weekday peak highway traffic hour(s) and peak development generated hour(s), and the Saturday peak traffic hour. All documentation must be contained in the report. Turning movement and mainline volumes shall be presented for all peak hour conditions (weekday a.m. peak, weekday p.m. peak, weekday site generated and Saturday peak) while only mainline volumes are required for ADTs. Source and method of computation must be included. The turning movement counts must take place on a Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday and shall be completed in normal driving conditions when school is in session (i.e., counts shall not be performed in inclement weather or icy/snowy conditions). The morning peak period counted shall be 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and the afternoon peak period counted shall be 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
(b) 
Volume/Capacity Analyses at Critical Points. A volume/capacity analysis based upon existing volumes shall be performed during the weekday and Saturday peak traffic hour(s) and the peak development generated hour(s) for all roadways and major intersections in the study area.
(c) 
Levels-of-Service at Critical Points. Based on the results obtained in the previous section, levels-of-service are to be computed and presented in schematic form. Included in this section shall also be description of typical operating conditions at each level-of-service.
(3) 
Analysis of Future Conditions Without Proposed Development. This section shall describe the anticipated traffic volumes in the future and the ability of the roadway network to accommodate this traffic without the proposed development. The future year(s) for which projections are made shall be development completion year unless reported otherwise by Hatboro Borough. Factors used within this section include, but are not limited to, background traffic growth expansion and traffic generated by other proposed developments as well as associated improvements.
(a) 
Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes. This section shall clearly indicate the method and assumptions used to forecast future volumes in order the Borough personnel can duplicate these calculations.
(b) 
Volume/Capacity Analyses at Critical Points. The ability of the roadway system to accommodate future traffic (without the proposed development) is to be described in this section. If roadway improvements or modifications are committed for implementation, the volume/capacity analysis shall be presented for these conditions. Periods of analysis shall be presented for these conditions. Periods of analysis shall be the same as those previously performed in Subsection 4B(2).
(c) 
Levels of Service at Critical Points. Based on the results obtained in the previous section, levels-of-service are to be determined and presented as in Subsection 4B(2).
(4) 
Analysis of Future Conditions with Proposed Development. This section describes the adequacy of the roadway system to accommodate future traffic with development of the site.
(a) 
Trip Generation. The estimation of vehicular trips to result from the proposal shall be completed for average weekday, average Saturday, peak traffic hours during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak traffic hours, the weekday peak development generated hour and the Saturday peak hour. These development generated traffic volumes shall be provided for the in-bound and out-bound traffic movements as estimated and the reference source(s) and methodology followed shall be documented. Any characteristics of the site which may cause particular trip generation problems shall be noted.
(b) 
Trip Distribution. The direction of approach for site generated traffic will be presented in this section for the appropriate time periods. As with all technical analysis steps, the basic method and assumptions used in this work must be clearly stated in order that Hatboro Borough officials may replicate these results.
(c) 
Traffic Assignment. This section describes the utilization of study area roadways by site generated traffic. The proposed traffic volumes to describe mainline and turning movement volumes for future conditions with the site developed as proposed. Traffic volumes shall be assigned to individual access points. If school crossings are to be used, pedestrian volumes shall be assigned to each crossing.
(d) 
Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes. Mainline and turning movement volumes shall be presented, in schematic form, for the highway network in the study area as well as driveways and internal circulation roadways for the appropriate time periods (identified previously).
(e) 
Volume/Capacity Analyses at Critical Points. A volume/capacity analysis shall be performed for the appropriate peak hours for future conditions with the site development as proposed.
(f) 
Levels-of-Service at Critical Points. Based on the results obtained in the previous section, levels-of-service are to be determined and presented as in Subsection 4B(2).
(5) 
Recommended Improvements. A description of proposed improvements to remedy deficiencies shall be included in this section. Improvements shall be identified which would replace capacity and/or return pre-development levels of service conditions. Alternative improvement scheme shall be presented for post-development traffic volumes to operate at a minimum level-of-service "D" and level-of-service "E" and in no circumstance leave post-development levels-of-service at unacceptable conditions (level "F"). These recommendations shall separately identify committed projects of governmental agencies which were described and independently identified in Subsection 4B(1)(d).
(a) 
Proposed Recommended Improvements. This section shall describe the location, nature, and extent of proposed improvements to assure sufficient capacity. The listing of recommended improvements shall include, but not be limited to, the following elements: internal circulation design, speed limit, stop and no parking sign locations, site access location and design, external roadway and intersection design and improvements, and traffic signal installation and operation including phasing and timing. All physical roadway improvements shall be shown in sketches. This listing shall also include, for each improvement: preliminary cost estimates, funding source, timing and likelihood of the improvement implementation, and the party responsible for the improvement.
(b) 
Volume/Capacity Analyses at Critical Points. Another iteration of the volume/capacity analysis shall be presented and described which demonstrates the anticipated results of making recommended improvements.
(c) 
Levels of Service at Critical Points. Based on the results obtained in the previous section, levels-of-service for the study area with improvements shall be provided.