[HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Rotterdam 6-6-1979
by L.L. No. 4-1979. Amendments noted where applicable.]
The purpose of this chapter is to implement for the Town of Rotterdam,
New York, the SEQRA and 6 NYCRR 617.
A.
The terms and words used in this chapter shall have the
same meanings as such terms and words are defined in Article 8 of the Environmental
Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR 617, unless the context requires a different
meaning.
B.
EAF
EIS
RULES AND REGULATIONS
SEQRA
TOWN
The following terms shall have the meanings indicated:
Environmental assessment form.
Environmental impact statement.
Those set forth in 6 NYCRR 617.
The State Environmental Quality Review Act as set forth in Article
8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR 617.
The Town of Rotterdam, New York.
No action, other than an exempt, excluded or Type II action, shall be
carried out, approved or funded by any agency, board, body or officer of the
Town unless it has complied with SEQRA, 6 NYCRR 617, to the extent applicable
and this chapter.
A.
An EAF shall be prepared by or on behalf of any agency,
board, body or officer of the Town in connection with any Type I action which
such agency, board, body or officer contemplates or proposes to carry out
directly. For an unlisted action, an EAF in a short or long form may be prepared
to facilitate a preliminary determination of environmental significance.
B.
An application for permit or funding of a Type I action
shall be accompanied by an EAF and for an unlisted action may be accompanied
by a short- or long-form EAF as may be needed to assist the lead agency in
making a preliminary determination of environmental significance. An applicant
may prepare a draft EIS to accompany the application in place of the EAF.
In lieu of an EAF, the Town Board or the lead agency having authority to adopt
its own regulations may adopt a different procedure for reviewing environmental
significance of unlisted actions. The lead agency shall make a preliminary
determination of environmental significance of the action on the basis of
the EAF, draft EIS or with respect to unlisted actions in accordance with
its own procedures, as the case may be, and such other information as it requires.
Such determination shall be made within 15 days of its designation as lead
agency or within 15 days of its receipt of all information it requires, whichever
is later. For Type I actions, a determination of nonsignificance shall be
noticed and filed as provided in Section 617.12; for unlisted actions, a determination
of nonsignificance shall be sent to the applicant and maintained in accordance
with Section 617.12. After a determination of nonsignificance, the action,
including one involving a permit or funding, shall be processed without further
regard to the SEQRA, 6 NYCRR 617 or this chapter.[1]
C.
The time of filing an application for approval or funding
of an action shall commence to run from the date the preliminary determination
of environmental nonsignificance is rendered or, if in lieu of an EAF the
applicant prepares a draft EIS, from the date the applicant files a draft
EIS acceptable to the lead agency.
If the lead agency determines that an EIS is required, it shall proceed
as provided in Sections 617.9, 617.11 and 617.12. Commencing with acceptance
of the draft EIS, the time limitation for processing the EIS shall run concurrently
with the time limitations applicable to processing the application for approval
or funding of the action, and a public hearing on the draft EIS, if any, shall
be held concurrently with any hearing to be held on such application. The
draft EIS shall be prepared by the applicant. Failure by the applicant to
prepare an EIS acceptable to the lead agency shall, at the option of the lead
agency, be deemed an abandonment and discontinuance of the application.
The lead agency shall be determined and designated as provided in Sections
617.6, 617.7 and 617.8, except that in the following Type I and unlisted actions
the lead agency shall be as provided herein:
A.
Adoption, amendment or change in zoning regulations not
requiring a federal or state agency permit or approval: the Town Board.
B.
Construction or expansion of Town buildings, Town structures
or Town facilities within the Town not requiring a federal or state agency
permit or approval: the Town Board.
C.
Purchase, sale and lease of real property by the Town
not requiring a federal or state agency permit or approval: the Town Board.
D.
Variances not requiring a federal or state agency permit
or approval: the Zoning Board of Appeals.
E.
Planned unit development not requiring a federal or state
agency permit or approval: the Planning Commission.
F.
Site plan review and/or special exception permit, neither
of which requires a federal or state agency permit or approval: the Planning
Commission.
G.
Construction or expansion of a nonresidential facility
not requiring a federal or state agency permit or approval: the Planning Commission.
H.
Parking lot not requiring a federal or state agency permit
or approval: the Planning Commission.
The Planning Commission shall act as the Town clearinghouse for lead
agency determination. Such clearinghouse shall assist agencies and applicants
to identify other agencies, including federal and state, that may be involved
in approving, funding or carrying out Type I and unlisted actions. The clearinghouse
shall also make recommendations on the designation of a lead agency.
Environmental review of actions involving a federal agency shall be
processed in accordance with Section 617.15.
Critical environmental areas may be designated by resolution of the
Town Board in accordance with Section 617.14(g).
The following are deemed Type I actions in addition to those set forth
in Section 617.4; any ordinance or local law contained in the Code of the
Town of Rotterdam which, when subjected to review in accordance with Section
617.7, Criteria, results in a positive finding that the action involved is
Type I.
The following are deemed Type II actions in addition to those set forth
in Section 617.5: any ordinance or local law contained in the Code of the
Town of Rotterdam which, when subjected to review in accordance with Section
617.7, results in a negative finding and that the action involved is Type
II.