The title of the body hereunder created shall be and is the
"Yonkers Design Review Board" (hereinafter referred to as "Board").
The City Council hereby finds that excessive uniformity, dissimilarity,
inappropriateness or poor quality of design in the exterior appearance
of buildings or other structures erected or altered can adversely
affect the desirability of the immediate and neighboring areas and,
by so doing, impair the benefits of occupancy of existing property
in such areas, impair the stability in value of both improved and
unimproved real property in such areas, prevent the most appropriate
development and use of such areas, produce degeneration of property
in such areas with attendant deterioration of conditions affecting
the health, safety, comfort and general welfare of the inhabitants
thereof, and contribute to the diminution of the taxable value of
real property in such areas and their ability to support municipal
services provided therefor. It is the purpose of this article to prevent
these and other potentially harmful effects resulting from such unattractive
exterior appearance of buildings and other structures erected or altered,
and thus to promote the public health, safety and welfare, to conserve
the value of buildings, to encourage the most appropriate use of land
and to improve the physical and visual appearance of the city.
There is hereby created a Design Review Board which shall consist
of five members, who shall serve without compensation. Such members
shall be specially qualified by reason of training or experience in
art, architecture, engineering, graphic design, landscape architecture,
community planning, land development, real estate or other relevant
business or profession, to judge the effects of a proposed building
or structure or alteration thereof upon the desirability, property
values and development of surrounding areas. At least two members
of such Board shall be registered architects. The members of such
Board shall be appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council,
and the Chairman thereof shall be designated by the Mayor and confirmed
by the City Council. Of the members first appointed, one shall hold
office for the term of one year, two for the term of two years, and
two for the term of three years from and after their respective appointments.
Their successors shall be appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by
the City Council for a term of three years from and after the expiration
of the terms of their predecessors in office. If a vacancy shall occur
otherwise than by expiration of term, it shall be filled by the Mayor
and confirmed by the City Council for the unexpired term.
Three members of the Board shall constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business as provided by Section 41 of the General Construction
Law.
The Design Review Board shall have 62 days (45 for referrals
as provided above) in which to act upon a matter before it. Such limit
shall be measured from the date of the meeting at which the Board
receives an application. Such time limit may be extended by mutual
agreement with the applicant. Failure to act on the part of the Board
within the time limit specified, or as may be extended, shall be deemed
to constitute approval.
In examining plans or proposals, the Design Review Board shall disapprove any design which would cause or contribute to one or more of the harmful effects set forth in §
44-8 of this Code by reason of:
A. Excessive dissimilarity or inappropriateness in relation to any other
structure existing or for which a permit has been issued, or to any
other structure included in the same permit application, facing upon
the same or intersecting street and within 500 feet of the proposed
new structure, in respect to one or more of the following features:
cubical content; gross floor area; building area or height of roof;
or other significant design features, such as paint color, siding,
materials or style of architectural design.
B. Excessive similarity to any other structure existing or for which
a permit has been issued, or to any other structure included in the
same permit application, facing upon the same or intersecting street
and within 500 feet of the proposed new structure, in respect to one
or more of the following features of exterior design and appearance:
apparently identical front, side or other elevations visible from
a street; substantially identical size and arrangement of either doors,
windows, porticoes or other openings or breaks in the elevation facing
the street, including reverse arrangement; or other significant identical
features of design, such as but not limited to material, roof line,
height or other design elements.
C. The quality of building and overall site design, in respect to one
or more of the following features: the relationship to and character
of the adjacent neighborhood; consideration of architectural style,
bulk, dimensions, materials, and location on the site and in relation
to development on adjoining properties, the natural terrain and vegetation.
In reviewing applications for conformity to the above standards,
the design shall be evaluated by the following criteria:
A. The facades of the building shall be of such material, color and/or texture, massing, fenestration, signs and advertising as not to be discordant or incongruous with comparable architectural elements of other buildings, identified in §
44-14 above, which, by reason of their proximate location, are visually related to the facades of nearby buildings. The facades shall not contain any feature or element which shall be so disproportionate by normal architectural standards or so garish that it detracts or may in the future detract from title appearance of nearby buildings or groupings of buildings.
B. Any projections from the facades shall be so positioned and designed
as to be harmonious with other proximate buildings. Consideration
shall be given to avoiding monotony in the development of contiguous
facades of adjacent buildings and also to avoid excessive and unattractive
disruption and irregularity in the continuity of adjacent facades.
C. Doors, windows, openings, porticoes and other projections or architectural
features shall be arranged, wherever possible, to enable adjoining
buildings to complement each other.
D. The facade of a building and the open areas adjacent to building
entrances and pedestrian walks shall be bordered with appropriate
shrubbery or plantings of a decorative character. Pedestrian walks
and sitting areas shall be surfaced so that they will easily be maintained
and be neat and attractive in appearance.
E. Vehicular parking areas, utility buildings and structures, garbage
and refuse disposal facilities and other service areas or entrances
shall utilize plantings, trees, shrubs or other methods where feasible
to shield unsightly and incongruous features from the public view,
to avoid large, unrelieved paved or surfaced areas and to minimize
the effect of these features on the overall appearance of the development.
F. Design and development of the rear facade shall be reviewed as well
as the front facade so as to create an attractive exposure and entranceway
for the public utilizing or viewing the rear of the premises.
Notwithstanding the provisions of § 43-67A of the Yonkers
Code, any person aggrieved by an action of the Design Review Board
in approving or disapproving an application before it may take an
appeal to and request a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals.
A. In making its determination, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall take
into consideration the benefit to the applicant if the variance is
granted, as weighed against the detriment to the health, safety and
welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant. In making
such determination the Board shall also consider:
(1) Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of
the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created
by the granting of the variance;
(2) Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some
method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than variance;
(3) Whether the requested variance is substantial;
(4) Whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact
on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or
district; and
(5) Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration
shall be relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but shall
not necessarily preclude the granting of the variance.
B. The Board of Appeals, in the granting of such variances, shall grant
the minimum variance that it shall deem necessary and adequate and
at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood
and the health, safety and welfare of the community.
C. The Board of Appeals shall, in the granting of such variances, have
the authority to impose such reasonable conditions and restrictions
as are directly related to and incidental to the proposed use of the
property. Such conditions shall be consistent with the spirit and
intent of this article and shall be imposed for the purpose of minimizing
any adverse impact such variance may have on the neighborhood or community.
Violations of the provisions of this article shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter
43, entitled "Zoning," Article
XIII, §
43-108.
Each application to the Design Review Board shall be accompanied
by a fee equal to 1% of project cost (as determined by the Yonkers
Building Department) but not less than $50 nor more than $500.