Exciting enhancements are coming soon to eCode360! Learn more 🡪
Town of Lumberland, NY
Sullivan County
By using eCode360 you agree to be legally bound by the Terms of Use. If you do not agree to the Terms of Use, please do not use eCode360.
A. 
Zoning Board of Appeals established, membership. There is hereby established a Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to the New York State Town Law. Said Board of Appeals shall consist of five members, including a Chairperson appointed by the Town Board. Appointments shall be in accordance with the New York State Town Law, and an appointment to a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of a term shall be for the remainder of the unexpired term. In the absence of a Town Board appointment of a Chairperson or in the absence of the Board member so appointed, the Board of Appeals may designate a member to serve as Acting Chairperson. The Town Board may also provide for compensation to be paid to experts, clerks and a secretary and provide for such other expenses as may be necessary and proper in connection with the operation of the Board of Appeals. In making such appointments, the Town Board may further require Board of Appeals members to complete training and continuing education courses.
B. 
Alternate members. The Town Board hereby elects to supersede the New York State Town Law and to provide, pursuant to the New York State Municipal Home Rule Law, for the appointment of one alternate member of the Board of Appeals to serve for a term of one year or until a successor is appointed. Such alternate member shall attend meetings and shall act in the capacity of a full member whenever regular members are absent or must recuse themselves due to conflicts of interest.
The Board of Appeals shall have the powers and duties authorized by the New York State Town Law and shall have the following specific powers and duties, provided that none of the following provisions shall be deemed to limit any power of the Board of Appeals that is conferred by law:
A. 
The Board of Appeals may reverse or affirm, wholly or in part, or may modify the order, requirement, decision, interpretation or determination appealed from and shall make such order, requirement, decision, interpretation or determination as in its opinion ought to have been made in the matter by the administrative official or body charged with the enforcement of this chapter, and to that end shall have all the powers of the administrative official or body from whose order, requirement, decision, interpretation or determination the appeal is taken.
B. 
The Board of Appeals shall have the power, upon an appeal from a decision or determination of the administrative official or body charged with the enforcement of this chapter, after public notice and hearing and in accordance with the requirements of law and this chapter, to grant area variances as defined herein.
C. 
The Board of Appeals shall have the power, upon an appeal from a decision or determination of the administrative official or body charged with the enforcement of this chapter, after public notice and hearing and in accordance with the requirements of law and this chapter, to grant use variances as defined herein.
D. 
The Board of Appeals shall, upon request from or appeal of a decision by the Code Enforcement Officer or any administrative body of the Town of Lumberland, including the Town Board, decide any question involving the interpretation of any provision of this chapter, including determination of the exact location of any district boundary if there is uncertainty with respect thereto.
A. 
Appeals and applications for variance and interpretation. The Board of Appeals shall act in accordance with the procedure specified by law and by this chapter. The Board of Appeals may establish its procedures and requirements, within the framework provided by law and this chapter, for conducting its business. All appeal, variance and interpretation applications made to the Board of Appeals shall be in writing on forms prescribed by the Board or provided for herein. Every application shall refer to the specific provision of the chapter involved and shall exactly set forth the interpretation that is claimed, the use which is involved or sought, and (if applicable) the details and type of the variance that is applied for and the grounds on which it is claimed that the variance should be granted, as the case may be. Every decision of the Board of Appeals shall be by resolution, each of which shall contain a full record of the findings of the Board in the particular case.
B. 
Required copies and fees. Ten copies of any appeal or variance or interpretation application and supporting documentation shall be filed with the Code Enforcement Officer, accompanied by a fee in the amount set from time to time by resolution of the Town Board.
C. 
Content of appeal or application. Each appeal or application shall fully set forth the circumstances of the case and contain the following information and documentation:
(1) 
The name, address and telephone number of the property owner and, if different, the name, address and telephone number of the applicant(s).
(2) 
Address, tax identification number for the property, existing use, acreage of parcel, and zoning district(s) designation.
(3) 
A narrative description of the proposed development project, with reference to the applicable use and other regulations of this chapter.
(4) 
A copy of the recorded deed must be furnished evidencing ownership of the property, together with copies of any leases, development agreements or other agreements between the property owner and the applicant(s).
(5) 
A list of all federal, state and other permits and other governmental approvals that would be required to implement the development project, and evidence of whether the applicant (or its agents) have applied for any such permits and approvals and whether the applicant (or its agents) have received any of the listed approvals.
(6) 
Copies of any environmental assessments or permit applications and supporting materials submitted to any other permitting agency in connection with the development project.
(7) 
A complete site development plan, in accordance with the requirements set forth in § 250-70.[1]
[1]
Editor's Note: Amended at time of adoption of Code (see Ch. 1, General Provisions, Art. I).
(8) 
Signature of the applicant, or the owner and the applicant if the applicant is not the owner, attesting to the accuracy of the statements and representations made in the application and constituting a certification by the owner, or owner and applicant (as applicable), that each has undertaken due diligence with respect to the matters asserted in the appeal or application.
D. 
Public hearings. The Board of Appeals shall fix a time for any required public hearings, give public notice thereof and issue decisions in accordance with the provisions of law. The applicant shall bear the cost of advertising and required public notice for public hearings. The Board of Appeals shall comply with SEQRA. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Board of Appeals shall hold a public hearing to consider each appeal and application for a variance or interpretation (as applicable) prior to rendering any decision on an application or appeal. This public hearing may begin concurrently with any required public hearing for the purpose of environmental review of the same development project and may continue after any such environmental review public hearing is closed. The public hearing shall be advertised in the official newspaper of the Town at least five business days before the date of the hearing, and the applicant and adjoining property owners shall be notified by mail at least 10 business days before the date of the hearing.
E. 
Appearances. On hearing of an application or appeal, a party may either appear in person or by a representative who need not be an attorney. If the party is to be represented by a person who is not an attorney, a notarized affidavit of appointment of a representative for the party must be presented to the Board of Appeals prior to the hearing. The applicant or applicant's legal representative must attend the public hearing and describe the appeal to the Board of Appeals. The Board of Appeals may not hold a hearing on an application unless the applicant or his/her representative is present.
F. 
Conduct of proceedings. The Board of Appeals shall be primarily concerned with facts and not with technicalities and shall decide the matters before it fairly and equitably having regard to the welfare of the community as a whole and to the rights of the applicant and neighbors. The Board of Appeals shall make its findings and determinations based upon substantial evidence contained in the record of its proceedings. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to present evidence in the form of testimony, exhibits, documents, models, plans and the like to support the application for approval of a variance or a favorable decision upon an appeal.
G. 
Referrals. The Board of Appeals may refer applications for variances and appeals for review by the Fire Department, the Department of Public Works, and any other Town officials or non-Town consultants deemed appropriate by the Board of Appeals. These may include, but shall not be limited to, local and county officials and representatives of county, state and federal agencies, including the Upper Delaware Council, the Sullivan County Soil and Water District, the State Department of Transportation, and the State Department of Environmental Conservation. Any comments from these reviewers shall be forwarded to the Board to aid its decision on the application or appeal. Additional consultation where fees are involved shall require approval by the Town Board, and any such fees shall be borne by the applicant.
H. 
Inspection. The Board of Appeals may defer decision on any matter for the purpose of an appropriate inspection by the Board of Appeals or any other agency that the Board deems to be an interested agency or to hear witnesses or procure the submission of pertinent records. An appeal or application on which determination by the Board is to be deferred shall become the first order of business at the next public meeting of the Board.
I. 
Imposition of conditions.
(1) 
In granting a variance or in making any determination upon which it is required to pass after public hearing under this chapter, the Board of Appeals shall have the authority to impose such reasonable conditions and restrictions as are directly related to and incidental to the proposed development project and as are, in the opinion of the Board, required to promote the intent and purposes of the Comprehensive Plan of the Town and this chapter. Such conditions shall be based on competent credible evidence on the record, be incorporated into the decision, and may include, without limitation, provisions for:
(a) 
Minimizing adverse impact of the development upon other land;
(b) 
Ensuring that the type, intensity, design, location, character and performance of activities shall be in harmony with the orderly development of the Town;
(c) 
Controlling the sequence of development, including when it must be commenced and completed;
(d) 
Controlling the duration of use or development and the time within which any temporary structure must be removed;
(e) 
Assuring satisfactory installation and maintenance of required public improvements;
(f) 
Designating the exact location and nature of development;
(g) 
Establishing detailed records by submission of drawings, maps, plats or specifications;
(h) 
Ensuring all proposed structures, equipment and materials shall be readily accessible for fire and police and other emergency responder protection; and
(i) 
Ensuring that the nature and intensity of operations involved in or conducted in connection with the proposed use, its site layout and its relation to access streets be such that both pedestrian and vehicular traffic to and from the use and assembly of persons in connection therewith will not be hazardous or inconvenient to or incongruous with the Town or conflict with the normal traffic of the Town.
(2) 
If the applicant refuses to accept such requirements and conditions, the variance or permit shall be denied. Failure to abide by any conditions attached to a permit or a variance shall be a violation of this chapter.
J. 
Conduct of Board of Appeals. Board of Appeals' action on applications and appeals shall additionally be subject to the following:
(1) 
Within 62 days of the completion of a public hearing on an application and completion of the required environmental review, the Board shall render one of the following decisions:
(a) 
Unconditional approval;
(b) 
Conditional approval;
(c) 
Request for revisions and resubmission; or
(d) 
Denial.
(2) 
Every decision of the Board shall fully set forth in a statement the circumstances of the case and shall contain a full record of the findings on which the decision is based. The decision shall be mailed to the applicant. Every decision shall be filed in the office of the Town Clerk within five business days after completion, and additionally copies shall be submitted to the Town Board, the Planning Board, and the Code Enforcement Officer.
(3) 
The Board of Appeals' statement may include recommendations of desirable modifications to be incorporated in a revised proposal, and conformance with specified modifications shall be considered a condition of any subsequent approval incorporating the same. In such a case, the Board may recommend to the applicant that it revise or redesign its application and resubmit the same after it has been revised or redesigned. The Board of Appeals may grant to the applicant a continuance of the review process and/or adjourn the conclusion of the public hearing. However, if more than 180 days has elapsed since the time of the Board's decision, the Board shall require a resubmission of the application.
(4) 
Upon any approval by the Board of the final proposal and payment by the applicant of all fees and reimbursable costs due to the Town, the Board of Appeals shall endorse its approval by signature or stamp on a copy of the application and shall forward it to the Code Enforcement Officer.
(5) 
Upon disapproval of an application for use variance or area variance, the Board of Appeals shall so inform the Code Enforcement Officer, and the Code Enforcement Officer shall not issue a zoning or building permit or certificate of occupancy to the applicant.
A. 
Requirements for appeal. Every appeal application shall contain such information as the Board of Appeals requires and shall refer to the specific provision of the chapter involved and shall exactly set forth the interpretation that is claimed. Appeals may be taken only within the time period allowed by law.
B. 
Additional required submissions for appeal. All appeals made to the Board of Appeals shall contain, in addition to the information required by § 250-60C above and by any other provision of this chapter, the following additional information:
(1) 
Copy of the permit application, any materials submitted with the application, and a copy of the Code Enforcement Officer's denial; and
(2) 
A brief narrative summary of the case explaining the relief sought and the reasons why the applicant is seeking relief and why the applicant asserts that the zoning decision is in error.
A. 
No existing violations. No use variance shall be issued, and no application for a use variance shall be considered by the Board of Appeals, for a property where there is an existing violation of this chapter upon such property. Other than an existing violation which is the subject of the area variance application being considered, no area variance shall be issued, and no application for an area variance shall be considered by the Board of Appeals, for a property where there is an existing violation of this chapter upon such property.
B. 
Public notice. Upon application for a use variance or area variance, a public notice of the proposed development, the size and form of which shall be approved by the Code Enforcement Officer, shall be posted by the applicant at the project site for a minimum of five business days. Such notice must remain in place at least until a decision to approve or disapprove the variance application has been made. The notice shall contain a narrative description of the development project which is the subject of the variance application; specification of the nature of the variance requested and reference to the applicable use and other regulations of this chapter; specification of the time and place of the public hearing; and specification as to whom and by when any public comments are to be communicated. The notice must be placed at or near the property line in the front yard so that it will be plainly visible from the street, and in cases where a property has frontage on more than one street, an additional sign must be placed at or near the property line on any additional street frontage so that the sign will be plainly visible from the street on which it has such additional frontage.
C. 
Failure to comply. Any use variance or area variance granted pursuant to this chapter shall be revocable upon the order of the Board of Appeals at any time upon the failure of the owner or the operator of the use or structure covered by the variance to observe all requirements of this chapter with respect to the maintenance and conduct of the use, upon the failure to observe all conditions in connection with such variance which were designated by the Board of Appeals in issuing the same, or upon the discovery that material submitted with the request for the variance was materially false or misleading. Prior to revoking any such variance, the Board of Appeals shall give the holder of the variance at least 10 days' written notice of the violation. If within such 10 days the variance holder so requests, the Board of Appeals shall hold a hearing upon the revocation of such variance and shall give the applicant for the hearing at least 10 days' written notice thereof either by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by personal service. The foregoing provisions shall not be deemed to preclude the use of any other remedy prescribed by law or by this chapter with respect to violations of the provisions of this chapter giving rise to such action for revocation.
D. 
Failure to commence and complete construction. Any area variance or use variance granted pursuant to this chapter shall automatically expire and be of no further force and effect six months after the granting thereof unless, within such six-month period, substantial construction shall have been commenced. Unless otherwise provided in the granting of the variance, such construction must be completed within one year of the date of commencement of substantial construction. If construction is not completed within such twelve-month period, the variance shall automatically expire and be of no further force or effect. The Board of Appeals shall be authorized, upon application and without hearing, to grant extensions of the variance for periods not to exceed six months in duration or to reinstate a lapsed variance for good cause shown.
E. 
Expiration of use variance. Whenever a use established pursuant to a use variance shall have been abandoned for a term of six months or more, or whenever the location of such use is substantially destroyed, then in such event the land, building or structure in which said use shall have existed shall not thereafter be used for the previously established use. A structure shall be "substantially destroyed" if the cost to repair and replace the same exceeds 50% of the then-current structural replacement value thereof.
F. 
Effect of denial. Where the Board of Appeals denies (on other than procedural grounds) a request for a use variance or area variance or otherwise rules against the applicant, the Board of Appeals may not consider another application requesting any or all of the same legal relief for a period of one year from the date of such denial or withdrawal, except:
(1) 
Where ordered to do so by a court of competent jurisdiction; or
(2) 
Where the application is accompanied by an affidavit setting forth facts to the satisfaction of the Board of Appeals showing a substantial change of circumstances justifying a rehearing.
G. 
Appeal of decision. A person aggrieved by any decision of the Board of Appeals may apply to the Supreme Court for a review by a proceeding under Article 78 of the New York State Civil Practice Law. Any such appeal shall stay all proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed from unless the Code Enforcement Officer certifies to the Board of Appeals, after the notice of appeal has been filed, that such a stay of proceedings would, in the Code Enforcement Officer's opinion, cause imminent peril to life or property by reason of facts stated in the certificate. In such a case, proceedings shall not be stayed except by a restraining order granted by a court of competent jurisdiction.
A. 
Authority to grant use variance. The Board of Appeals, on application following the denial or referral of a zoning permit, shall have the power to grant a use variance. If the use variance is granted, the applicant must obtain site plan review approval from the Planning Board prior to commencing the use or obtaining a building permit or zoning permit.
B. 
Required finding of unnecessary hardship. No such use variance shall be granted by the Board of Appeals without a showing by the applicant and finding by the Board of Appeals that applicable zoning regulations and restrictions have caused unnecessary hardship.
(1) 
Unnecessary hardship. In order to prove such unnecessary hardship, the applicant shall be required to demonstrate to the Board of Appeals that for each and every permitted use under the zoning regulations for the particular district where the property is located all of the following four criteria are satisfied:
(a) 
The applicant cannot realize a reasonable return on the entire parcel of property, provided that lack of return is substantial as demonstrated by competent financial evidence;
(b) 
That the alleged hardship relating to the property in question is unique and does not apply to a substantial portion of the district or neighborhood involved;
(c) 
That the requested use variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; and
(d) 
That the alleged hardship has not been self-created.
(2) 
Reasonable rate of return. In order to make a determination that the applicant is unable to realize a reasonable rate of return, the Board of Appeals must find that the entire original or expanded property holdings of the applicant (and not just the site of the proposed development project) are incapable of producing a reasonable rate of return. No use variance shall be granted unless, in addition to satisfying all other applicable provisions of law and this chapter, the Board of Appeals finds the that the applicant has clearly demonstrated, by detailed "dollar and cents" proof, the inability to obtain a reasonable return for the entire parcel (and not just the site of the proposed development project) and for each and every permitted use in the district (including those uses permitted by special use permit).
(3) 
Unique hardship. No use variance shall be granted unless, in addition to satisfying all other applicable provisions of law and this chapter, the Board of Appeals finds that the entire parcel of which the development project is a part possesses unique characteristics that distinguish it from other properties in the area.
(4) 
Essential character of the neighborhood.
(a) 
In making its determination of whether a proposed development project will alter the essential character of the neighborhood, the Board of Appeals shall take into account factors that are of vital importance to the citizens of the Town, including, without limitation:
[1] 
The rural residential and scenic and natural character of the Town;
[2] 
Its irreplaceable recreation and tourism sites;
[3] 
The extent of hazard to life, limb or property that may result from the proposed development project;
[4] 
Health impacts;
[5] 
The social and economic impacts of traffic congestion, noise, dust, odors, emissions, solid waste generation and other nuisances;
[6] 
The impact on property values; and
[7] 
Whether the applicant will use a style of development that will result in degradation to the air quality, water quality or scenic and natural resources of the Town.
(b) 
In order to find that the proposed development project does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood, the Board of Appeals shall interpret the public interest in said essential character of the neighborhood to require, at a minimum, that the development project will not do any of the following:
[1] 
Pose a threat to the public safety, including public health, water quality or air quality;
[2] 
Cause an extraordinary public expense; or
[3] 
Create a nuisance.
(5) 
Self-created hardship. The Board of Appeals shall find that the applicant suffers from a self-created hardship in the event that the Board determines that:
(a) 
The applicant's inability to obtain a reasonable return on the property as a whole results from having paid too much or from a poor investment decision;
(b) 
The applicant previously divided the property and is left with only a portion which suffers from some unique condition for which relief is sought and which did not apply to the parcel as a whole; or
(c) 
When the applicant purchased the property, he or she knew or should have known the property was subject to the zoning restrictions.
C. 
Additional required submissions for use variance. In addition to the application requirements set forth elsewhere in this chapter, an application for a use variance shall contain a typewritten narrative explaining what the application is for and how the development project meets or exceeds all of the criteria for a use variance, including:
(1) 
Evidence.
(a) 
Competent financial evidence containing reasonable specification of the nature and factual particulars of such claim, and articulating the basis for the applicant's claim, and including, at a minimum (as to the entire parcel of which the proposed development project is a part):
[1] 
Date of acquisition;
[2] 
The purchase price;
[3] 
Present value of the property;
[4] 
The amount of real estate taxes;
[5] 
The amount of mortgages or liens and other expenses;
[6] 
The asking price for the property when it had been offered for sale;
[7] 
The costs of demolishing any existing structures on the property;
[8] 
Cost of erecting a new building(s) for each and every permitted use in the zoning district (including uses allowed by special use permit);
[9] 
Efforts to market the property; and
[10] 
A schedule of all other property in common ownership at either the date of the enactment of this chapter or thereafter.
(b) 
Competent financial evidence must include dollars and cents proof, such as appraisals, economic studies and any other evidence supporting the applicant's contention that the desired relief is appropriate, including appraisals relating to any alleged diminution of all or substantially all of the fair market value of property. For the purposes of this section, "common ownership" means all other interests in property either located within the Town or contiguous to the Town that is held by the applicant, whether such ownership is of a legal or equitable interest, in whole or in part, contiguous or not, and whether such property interest is held by the applicant through a legal or equitable interest in a(nother) corporation, partnership, trust, business, entity, association, fund, joint venture, or individually.
(2) 
Evidence demonstrating the unique nature of parcel as a whole. The fact that the improvements already existing at the time of the application are old, obsolete, outmoded or in disrepair or the fact that the property is then unimproved shall not be deemed to make the plight of the property unique or to contribute thereto. Exceptional topographic conditions are an example of a factor demonstrating the unique nature of the property.
(3) 
Evidence demonstrating that the proposed development project will not change the essential character of the neighborhood with regard to physical, economic, social or environmental elements. Adverse impacts to the essential character of the neighborhood include, but are not limited to, decreased quality or increased quantity of stormwater runoff, increased soil erosion, increased traffic congestion, decreased road quality, impairment of the scenic or rural character of roads, increased noise, dust, odor and/or glare, reduced wildlife habitat, decreased air quality, decreased water quality, impairment of the viewshed, creation of solid wastes, negative impacts on sustainability efforts, increased social costs, increased emergency response times, negative impacts to public infrastructure, decreased property values, and negative impacts on the health of area residents.
(4) 
Evidence showing that the hardship is not self-created; to wit that, either:
(a) 
When the property was purchased the zoning restrictions from which a use variance is now sought were not in existence or did not otherwise apply; or
(b) 
Some other change has occurred since the applicant's purchase which makes the use nonconforming, as long as the change was not caused by the applicant.
D. 
Minimum use variance to be granted. The Board of Appeals in the granting of use variances shall grant only the minimum variance that it shall deem necessary and adequate to allow an economically beneficial use of the property and at the same time preserve and protect the essential character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Required submission for use variance for explicitly prohibited use. In addition to all of the other information required for all use variance applications (set forth in §§ 250-60C and 250-63C above) and/or all other information required for appeal applications (set forth in § 250-61B), the following reports shall be required to be submitted as part of any application or appeal concerning what is otherwise an explicitly prohibited use. The purpose of these reports in the context of otherwise explicitly prohibited uses is to assist the Board of Appeals in its determination as to the impact of the proposed development project on the Town and/or the essential character of the neighborhood and/or to determine whether the proposed development project otherwise complies with the requirements of this chapter:
A. 
A completed draft of an Environmental Assessment Form, Part I.
B. 
The approximate location of all neighboring residential, hamlet, park/recreational, and/or agricultural areas, as well as all critical environmental areas (if any) within a two-mile radius of the perimeter of the site of the proposed use.
C. 
A traffic impact report, containing the following:
(1) 
The proposed traffic circulation plan, the projected number of motor vehicle trips to enter or leave the site, estimated for daily and peak hour traffic levels;
(2) 
Existing and proposed daily and peak traffic hour levels and road capacity levels;
(3) 
A determination of the area of impact of traffic to and from the proposed development project;
(4) 
The proposed traffic routes to the nearest intersection with an arterial highway, including gross weights and heights of vehicles requirements presented by the proposed development project;
(5) 
The projected traffic flow pattern, including vehicular movements at all major intersections likely to be affected by the proposed development project;
(6) 
The impact of this traffic upon existing abutting public and private ways in relation to existing road capacities;
(7) 
A traffic impact analysis of the effects of the proposed development project on the transportation network in the Town using passenger car equivalents;
(8) 
Articulation of the effects and impacts of the proposed development project on traffic based on existing conditions and projected future background traffic on the state, county and Town road system;
(9) 
Evaluation of whether the resulting traffic conditions are likely to hinder the passage of police, fire and emergency response vehicles or degrade the quality of life, and/or otherwise contribute to hazardous traffic conditions; and
(10) 
Determination of whether there is sufficient road frontage so that any vehicle leaving the site may turn into the lane of traffic moving in the desired direction and be channeled within such lane before crossing the nearest intersection or proceeding along the road, and any vehicle entering the property may turn out of the nearest lane of traffic without interfering with other traffic.
D. 
An evaluation of:
(1) 
Appropriate roadway geometry including required road widths, bridge widths, starting and stopping sight distances, intersection sight distances, horizontal and vertical curves along the proposed traffic routes;
(2) 
The adequacy of existing pavement structures along the proposed traffic routes to accommodate the full weight load of any high-impact trucks likely to be used in connection with the proposed development project; and
(3) 
Impacts to the rural or scenic character of any roads along the proposed traffic route.
E. 
A description of ingress and egress through the proposed development project site through which equipment and supplies will be delivered and which will provide access during and after construction, and identification of any roads, streets, intersections, bridges and other facilities along the proposed traffic route that do not meet New York State Department of Transportation standards. Such description and identification shall describe any anticipated improvements to existing roads, bridges or other infrastructure; any new road or access construction measures which will be taken to avoid damaging access/traffic routes, and measures that will be taken to restore damaged routes following construction, and measures to maintain the scenic and/or rural characteristics of such roads.
F. 
A noise impact report on the following topics:
(1) 
The existing audible conditions at the development project site to identify a baseline sound presence and preexisting ambient noise, including seasonal variation.
(2) 
A description and map of sound-producing features of the proposed development project from any noise-generating equipment and noise-generating operations that will be conducted in connection with the proposed project site, including noise impacts from truck traffic travelling within the Town to and from the proposed development project.
(3) 
For the noise generated by construction and use of the proposed development project, the range of noise levels and the tonal and frequency characteristics expected, and the basis for the expectation.
(4) 
A description and map of the existing land uses and structures, including any sound receptors (i.e., residences, hospitals, libraries, schools and places of worship, parks, areas with outdoor workers) within one mile of the development project parcel boundaries. (Said description shall include the location of the structure/land use, distances from the proposed development project and expected decibel readings for each receptor.)
(5) 
The report shall specifically cover (without limitation) low-frequency, A-weighted, infrasound, pure tone, and repetitive/impulse noise.
(6) 
The report shall describe the development project's proposed noise-control features, including specific measures proposed to protect workers and mitigate noise impacts for sensitive receptors.
G. 
A visual presentation of how the site of the proposed development project will relate to and be compatible with the adjacent and neighboring areas, within a two-mile radius of the perimeter of the site of the proposed development project. This presentation shall include computerized photographic simulation showing the site during construction and fully developed and demonstrating any visual impacts from strategic vantage points. Color photographs of the proposed site from at least two locations accurately depicting the existing conditions shall be included. The study shall also indicate the color treatment of the facility's components and any visual screening incorporated into the project that is intended to lessen visual prominence.
H. 
A report containing:
(1) 
A description of any natural gas and/or petroleum extraction, exploration or production wastes, and any other solid wastes, industrial wastes, hazardous wastes, toxic wastes, and pollutants expected to be produced, utilized, stored, injected, discarded, discharged, disposed, released or maintained on the development project site;
(2) 
A description of controls and practices to eliminate or minimize release of all such materials into the environment; and
(3) 
A plan for ultimate disposal of such materials whether on or off site.
I. 
A discussion of:
(1) 
The extent of the use of nonrenewable resources during the initial and continued phases of the proposed development project;
(2) 
The expected duration of the initial and continued phases of the proposed development project; and
(3) 
The extent to which the proposed development project may contribute to an irreversible commitment to the continuation of this proposed use by future generations.
J. 
A discussion of characteristics of the proposed development project that may decrease the Town's and/or the neighborhood's suitability for other uses, such as residential, commercial, historical, cultural, tourism, recreational, environmental or scenic uses.
K. 
An assessment describing the adverse effects and impacts on Town revenue and costs necessitated by additional public facility and service costs likely to be generated by the proposed development project.
L. 
A fire prevention, equipment failure, and emergency response report, containing the following:
(1) 
Description of the potential fire, equipment failures and emergency scenarios associated with the proposed development project that may require a response from fire, emergency medical services, police or other emergency responders;
(2) 
An analysis of the worst-case disaster associated with the proposed development project and the impact of such a disaster upon the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the Town and their property;
(3) 
Designation of the specific agencies that would respond to potential fires, equipment failures, accidents or other emergencies;
(4) 
Description of all emergency response training and equipment needed to respond to a fire, accident, equipment failure or other emergency, including an assessment of the training and equipment available to local agencies; and
(5) 
The approximate or exact location of all fire, police and emergency response service facilities within a five-mile radius of the perimeter of the site of the proposed use, and a detailed fire control and pollution prevention and emergency response plan.
M. 
A public facilities and services assessment, describing:
(1) 
Whether current Town public facilities and services, including water supply, fire protection, school services, recreation facilities, police protection, roads and stormwater facilities, are adequate for the proposed development project (taking into account all other uses that have been permitted or are currently operating in the Town);
(2) 
A comparison of the capacity of the public services and facilities to the maximum projected demand that may result from the proposed development project (in determining the effect and impact of the proposed development project on fire, police and emergency services, the review shall take into consideration response times and the number and location of available apparatus and fire, police and emergency service stations, and specification as to whether the same are manned by full-time, paid or volunteer professional service personnel; and where applicable, calculation of response time shall also include the time it takes volunteer emergency personnel to get to their stations); and
(3) 
A review of the impact of the proposed development project on the safety of all children going to and from school by car, bus, bicycle, and walking during and outside of school zone hours and whether safety measures such as signaled crosswalks, elevated sidewalks, green space buffers for pedestrians/bikes where established walking/biking route overlap/run along intended truck routes so as to prevent accidents.
N. 
A property value analysis, prepared by a licensed appraiser in accordance with industry standards, regarding the potential impact of the development project on the value of properties adjoining the project site.
O. 
A human health impact assessment that identifies ways in which the proposed development project could adversely affect the health of Town residents and a priority list of recommendations to minimize the potential health impacts of the proposed development project. The health impact assessment shall at a minimum include:
(1) 
A risk assessment of possible impact of chemical exposure on the health of residents, including the chemical abstract service number of all chemicals proposed to be used or generated at the development project site;
(2) 
An assessment of possible health effects due to industrial operations in non-heavy-industrial zoned areas;
(3) 
An assessment of possible health effects due to community changes, including the presence of an industrial activity in a previously non-heavy-industrial area, a perceived loss of shared community ideals and cohesion, declining property values, impacts to the education system and sudden changes in population numbers, demographics and customs; and
(4) 
Proposed remedies to address principal findings.
A. 
Authority to grant area variances. The Board of Appeals shall have the power, upon an appeal from a decision or determination of the Code Enforcement Officer or the Planning Board, to grant an area variance.
B. 
Required considerations in granting an area variance.
(1) 
"Area variance" shall mean the authorization by the Board of Appeals for the use of land in a manner that is not allowed by the dimensional or physical requirements of the applicable zoning regulations.
(2) 
In making its determination, the Board of Appeals shall take into consideration the benefit to the applicant if the area variance is granted as weighed against the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such a grant. In making such determination, the Board of Appeals shall also consider:
(a) 
Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance;
(b) 
Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance;
(c) 
Whether the requested area variance is substantial;
(d) 
Whether the proposed area variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district; and
(e) 
Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration shall be relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals but shall not necessarily preclude the granting of the area variance.
C. 
Minimum area variance to be granted. The Board of Appeals in the granting of area variances shall grant only the minimum variance that it shall deem necessary and adequate and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community.
D. 
Additional required submissions for area variance. In addition to the information required for all applications set forth in § 250-60C above, applications for an area variance shall contain a typewritten narrative explaining what the application is for and how the development project meets or exceeds all of the criteria for an area variance.