This chapter shall not apply to structures or uses lawfully
in existence or lawfully begun, or to a building or special permit
issued before the first publication of notice of the public hearing
required by MGL c. 40A, § 5 at which this zoning ordinance,
or any relevant part thereof, was adopted. Such prior, lawfully existing
nonconforming uses and structures may continue, provided that no modification
of the use or structure is accomplished, unless authorized hereunder.
The owner or occupant of any use that does not conform to the
regulations of the district in which it is located may apply to the
Planning Board for a determination that the use is a legal preexisting
nonconforming use. Unless such determination is made by the Zoning
Board of Appeals or the Building Inspector, no such use shall be changed
to another nonconforming use.
The Board of Appeals may grant a special permit to change or
extend a nonconforming use in accordance with this section only if
it determines that such change or extension shall not be substantially
more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
The following types of changes to nonconforming uses may be considered
by the Zoning Board of Appeals:
A. Change or substantial extension of the use.
B. Change from one nonconforming use to another, equally appropriate
or more appropriate nonconforming use.
Nonconforming single- and two-family residential structures
may be reconstructed, extended, altered, or structurally changed upon
a determination by the Building Inspector that such proposed reconstruction,
extension, alteration, or change does not increase the nonconforming
nature of said structure, and the issuance of a building permit, where
applicable.
A. Any of
the following circumstances shall not be deemed to increase the nonconforming
nature of said structure:
(1) Alteration to a structure which complies with all current setback,
yard, building and lot coverage, and building height requirements
but is located on a lot with insufficient area, where the alteration
will also comply with all of said current requirements.
(2) Alteration to a structure which complies with all current setback,
yard, building and lot coverage, and building height requirements
but is located on a lot with insufficient frontage, where the alteration
will also comply with all of said current requirements.
(3) Alteration to a structure which encroaches upon one or more required yard or setback areas, where the alteration will comply with all current setback, yard, building and lot coverage and building height requirements. The provisions of this Subsection
A(3) shall apply regardless of whether the lot complies with current area and frontage requirements.
B. In the event that the Building Inspector determines that the nonconforming
nature of such structure would be increased by the proposed reconstruction,
extension, alteration, or change, the Board of Appeals may, by a finding
(which shall not require a supermajority required by MGL c. 40A, §
6), allow such reconstruction, extension, alteration, or change where
it determines that the proposed modification will not be substantially
more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing nonconforming
structure.
Any use that is permitted by special permit under the terms
of this chapter (other than a change through Zoning Board of Appeals
action from a nonconforming use to another nonconforming use) shall
not be deemed a nonconforming use but shall without further action
be considered a conforming use.
No nonconforming use shall, if changed to a conforming use,
revert to a nonconforming use.
A property owner may not create a valid building lot by dividing
it from another parcel rendered nonconforming by such a division.