A.
This is a performance zoning code, which differs from traditional specification zoning. The previous Monona Zoning Ordinance was a specification ordinance, with rigid lists of permitted, conditional and prohibited uses for each district. For all districts there were regulations to specify the exact minimum lot and yard dimensions, building heights and setbacks, and open space requirements. Complicated procedures were required to obtain permission for minor variances from the regulations, yet the regulations were unsuccessful in preventing development which was unattractive, environmentally unsound and incompatible with the needs of the community.
B.
Performance zoning substitutes sensible judgment and efficient administration for rigid regulations. The intent of this performance zoning code is to regulate development according to flexible standards, with individual review of each development proposal. Proposed developments are to be judged on the basis of their compatibility with the land, the environment, surrounding uses, the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, general use and site performance standards and specific district performance standards.
C.
Monona is a landlocked community. Since Monona is almost fully developed, it is crucial that the development of its remaining vacant land be carefully regulated to meet the community's needs for services, a diversity of housing, economic growth, jobs convenient to employees' homes, and an improved environmental and aesthetic quality. Monona faces the conditions of scarce land and an impending shift from the rapid development of raw land to a slower process of redevelopment of existing uses. Under these circumstances, maintenance of the quality of life in Monona requires individual project review according to performance standards instead of specification standards, which were more appropriate when Monona was less developed and more rapidly growing.
D.
In many cases, the specification zoning previously used in Monona obstructed creative and desirable development because the zoning regulations were too rigid and arbitrary and because any deviation from these regulations required cumbersome administrative and governmental procedures. This performance zoning code is designed to be more flexible and to use more efficient administrative and governmental procedures. In order to avoid delays in processing development applications, this chapter establishes strict time limits for the review process. In order to ensure administrative fairness, this chapter requires that decisions of the reviewing agency be put in writing and be based only on how the evidence presented to it for review meets the standards set by this chapter.