Exciting enhancements are coming soon to eCode360! Learn more 🡪
City of South Milwaukee, WI
Milwaukee County
By using eCode360 you agree to be legally bound by the Terms of Use. If you do not agree to the Terms of Use, please do not use eCode360.
A. 
Notice of noncompliance. When the Superintendent finds that a user is not in compliance, the Superintendent may serve upon the user a written Notice of Noncompliance. Within 30 days from the date of written notification, unless a shorter timeframe is necessary due to the nature of the noncompliance, a plan and timeframe for industry resampling and/or correction of the noncompliance, or other provisions that return the user to compliance, shall be submitted by the user to the Superintendent.
B. 
Notification of violation. When the Superintendent finds that a user has violated, or continues to violate, any provision of this chapter, a wastewater discharge permit or order issued hereunder, or any other pretreatment standard or requirement, the Superintendent may serve upon that user a written Notice of Violation. Within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, an explanation of the violation and a plan for the satisfactory correction and prevention thereof, to include specific required actions, shall be submitted by the user to the Superintendent. Submission of this plan in no way relieves the user of liability for any violations occurring before or after receipt of the Notice of Violation. Nothing in this subsection shall limit the authority of the Superintendent to take any action, including emergency actions or any other enforcement action, without first issuing a Notice of Violation.
C. 
Special order. The City may issue an order requiring that a violation be remedied within a specified time period. If authorized in the order, the industry may meet with the Superintendent within 30 days of the date of receipt of the order to discuss the allegations and, where necessary, establish a corrective action plan. The issuance of a compliance order shall not be a bar against, or a prerequisite for, taking any other action against the user.
D. 
Show cause hearing. The Superintendent may order a user which has violated, or continues to violate, any provision of this chapter, a wastewater discharge permit or order issued hereunder, or any other pretreatment standard or requirement, to appear before the Wastewater Commission and show cause why the proposed enforcement action should not be taken. Notice shall be served on the user specifying the time and place for the meeting, the proposed enforcement action, the reason for such action, and a request that the user show cause why the proposed enforcement action should not be taken. The notice of the meeting shall be served personally or by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) at least 10 days prior to the hearing. Such notice may be served on any authorized representative of the user.
E. 
Emergency suspensions.
(1) 
The Superintendent may immediately suspend a user's discharge, after informal notice to the user, whenever such suspension is necessary to stop an actual or threatened discharge, which reasonably appears to present, or cause an imminent or substantial endangerment to the health or welfare of persons. The Superintendent may also immediately suspend a user's discharge, after notice and opportunity to respond, that threatens to interfere with the operation of the POTW or which presents, or may present, an endangerment to the environment.
(a) 
Any user notified of a suspension of its discharge shall immediately stop or eliminate its contribution. In the event of a user's failure to immediately comply voluntarily with the suspension order, the Superintendent may take such steps as deemed necessary, including immediate severance of the sewer connection, to prevent or minimize damage to the POTW, its receiving stream, or endangerment to any individuals. The Superintendent may allow the user to recommence its discharge when the user has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Superintendent that the period of endangerment has passed, unless the termination proceedings in § 11.40F of this chapter are initiated against the user.
(b) 
A user that is responsible, in whole or in part, for any discharge presenting imminent endangerment shall submit a detailed written statement, describing the causes of the harmful contribution and the measures taken to prevent any future occurrence, to the Superintendent prior to the date of any show cause or termination hearing under § 11.40D or F of this chapter.
(2) 
Nothing in this subsection shall be interpreted as requiring a hearing prior to any emergency suspension under this subsection.
F. 
Termination of discharge. In addition to the provisions in § 11.31E of this chapter, any user who violates the following conditions of this chapter is subject to discharge termination:
(1) 
Violation of wastewater discharge permit conditions;
(2) 
Failure to accurately report the wastewater constituents and characteristics of its discharge;
(3) 
Failure to report significant changes in operations or wastewater volume, constituents, and characteristics prior to discharge;
(4) 
Refusal of reasonable access to the user's premises for the purpose of inspection, monitoring, or sampling; or
(5) 
Violation of the pretreatment standards in Subchapter II of this chapter.
(6) 
Such user will be notified of the proposed termination of its discharge and be offered an opportunity to show cause under § 11.40D of this chapter why the proposed action should not be taken. Exercise of this option by the Superintendent shall not be a bar to, or a prerequisite for, taking any other action against the user.
A. 
Injunctive relief. When the Superintendent finds that a user has violated, or continues to violate, any provision of this chapter, a wastewater discharge permit, or order issued hereunder, or any other pretreatment standard or requirement, the Superintendent may petition the Milwaukee County Court through South Milwaukee Attorney for the issuance of a temporary or permanent injunction, as appropriate, which restrains or compels the specific performance of the wastewater discharge permit, order, or other requirement imposed by this chapter on activities of the user. The Superintendent may also seek such other action as is appropriate for legal and/or equitable relief, including a requirement for the user to conduct environmental remediation. A petition for injunctive relief shall not be a bar against, or a prerequisite for, taking any other action against a user.
B. 
Civil penalties.
(1) 
A user who has violated or continues to violate any provision of this chapter, a wastewater discharge permits or order issued hereunder or any other pretreatment standard or requirement shall be liable to South Milwaukee for a forfeiture not less than $1,000 per violation, per day. Each day on which a violation shall occur or continue shall be deemed a separate and distinct offense. In addition to the penalties provided herein, the City may recover its damages, reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, court reporters' fees and other expenses of litigation by appropriate suit at law against the person found to have violated this chapter or the orders, rules, regulations and permits issued hereunder. The superintendent is authorized to issue a municipal citation for any offense under this chapter. In the case of a monthly or other long-term average discharge limit, penalties shall accrue for each day during the period of the violation.
(2) 
The Superintendent may recover reasonable attorneys' fees, court costs, and other expenses associated with enforcement activities, including sampling and monitoring expenses, and the cost of any actual damages incurred by South Milwaukee.
(3) 
In determining the amount of civil liability, the Court shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including, but not limited to, the extent of harm caused by the violation, the magnitude and duration of the violation, any economic benefit gained through the user's violation, corrective actions by the user, the compliance history of the user, and any other factor as justice requires.
(4) 
Filing a suit for civil penalties shall not be a bar against, or a prerequisite for, taking any other action against a user.
C. 
Criminal prosecution. Penalties shall be as provided by State Statutes.
D. 
Remedies nonexclusive. The remedies provided for in this chapter are not exclusive. The Superintendent may take any, all, or any combination of these actions against a noncompliant user. Enforcement of pretreatment violations will generally be in accordance with South Milwaukee enforcement response plan. However, the Superintendent may take other action against any user when the circumstances warrant. Further, the Superintendent is empowered to take more than one enforcement action against any noncompliant user.
A. 
Liability insurance. The Superintendent may decline to issue or reissue a wastewater discharge permit to any user who has failed to comply with any provision of this chapter, a previous wastewater discharge permit, or order issued hereunder, or any other pretreatment standard or requirement, unless the user first submits proof that it has obtained financial assurances sufficient to restore or repair damage to the POTW caused by its discharge.
B. 
Water supply severance. Whenever a user has violated or continues to violate any provision of this chapter, a wastewater discharge permit, or order issued hereunder, or any other pretreatment standard or requirement, water service to the user may be severed. Service will only recommence, at the user's expense, after it has satisfactorily demonstrated its ability to comply.
C. 
Public nuisances. A violation of any provision of this chapter, a wastewater discharge permit, or order issued hereunder, or any other pretreatment standard or requirement is hereby declared a public nuisance and shall be corrected or abated as directed by the Superintendent. Any person(s) creating a public nuisance shall be subject to the provisions of State law governing such nuisances, including reimbursing South Milwaukee for any costs incurred in removing, abating, or remedying said nuisance.
D. 
Informant rewards. The Superintendent may pay up to $1,000 for information leading to the discovery of noncompliance by a user.
A. 
Upset.
(1) 
An upset shall constitute an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with categorical pretreatment standards if the requirements of Subsection A(2)(c)[3] below, are met.
(2) 
A user who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that:
(a) 
An upset occurred and the user can identify the cause(s) of the upset;
(b) 
The facility was at the time being operated in a prudent and workman-like manner and in compliance with applicable operation and maintenance procedures; and
(c) 
The user has submitted the following information to the Superintendent within 24 hours of becoming aware of the upset if this information is provided orally, a written submission must be provided within five days:
[1] 
A description of the indirect discharge and cause of noncompliance;
[2] 
The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times or, if not corrected, the anticipated time the noncompliance is expected to continue; and;
[3] 
Steps being taken and/or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the noncompliance.
(3) 
In any enforcement proceeding, the user seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset shall have the burden of proof.
(4) 
Users will have the opportunity for a judicial determination on any claim of upset only in an enforcement action brought for noncompliance with categorical pretreatment standards.
(5) 
Users shall control production of all discharges to the extent necessary to maintain compliance with categorical pretreatment standards upon reduction, loss, or failure of its treatment facility until the facility is restored or an alternative method of treatment is provided. This requirement applies in the situation where, among other things, the primary source of power of the treatment facility is reduced, lost, or fails.
B. 
Bypass.
(1) 
For the purposes of this subsection,
(a) 
"Bypass" means the intentional diversion of wastestreams from any portion of a user's treatment facility.
(b) 
"Severe property damage" means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities, which causes them to become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources, which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in production.
(2) 
A user may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause pretreatment standards or requirements to be violated, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provision of Subsection B(3) and (4) of this section.
(3) 
Notice.
(a) 
If a user knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice to the Superintendent, at least 10 days before the date of the bypass, if possible.
(b) 
A user shall submit oral notice to the Superintendent of an unanticipated bypass that exceeds applicable pretreatment standards within 24 hours from the time it becomes aware of the bypass. A written submission shall also be provided within five days of the time the user becomes aware of the bypass. The written submission shall contain a description of the bypass and its cause; the duration of the bypass, including exact dates and times, and, if the bypass has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the bypass. The superintendent may waive the written report on a case-by-case basis if the oral report has been received within 24 hours.
(4) 
Enforcement action.
(a) 
Bypass is prohibited, and the Superintendent may taken an enforcement action against a user for a bypass, unless.
[1] 
Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage;
[2] 
There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and
[3] 
The user submitted notices as required under Subsection B(3) of this section.
(b) 
The Superintendent may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if the Superintendent determines that it will meet the three conditions listed in Subsection B(4)(a) of this section.