A.
The criteria for conditional uses as listed for each zoning district in Article II are listed below. The Board of Supervisors, in granting a conditional use, may attach reasonable conditions and safeguards, in addition to those expressed in this chapter, as they may deem necessary to implement the purposes of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC)[1] and this chapter.
[1]
Editor's Note: See 53 P.S. § 10101 et seq.
B.
Applications for conditional uses shall be made to the Planning Commission, at a time and place established by the office. Conditional uses shall be granted or denied by the Board of Township Supervisors after the recommendation of the Township Planning Commission. Procedures shall follow those specified in this chapter and the MPC. Where there is a conflict between a procedure in this chapter, and the MPC (including any future amendments to the state code), the standards of the MPC shall take precedent, for all hearings, procedures, and time limitations.
[Amended 7-13-2020 by Ord. No. 2020-01; 5-22-2023 by Ord. No. 2023-01]
C.
The Planning Commission shall review all applications for conditional use to determine that they are complete and correct. A public hearing shall be scheduled within 60 days of the date of application, unless the applicant has agreed in writing. If the hearing is not completed within the initial day scheduled, each subsequent extension of the hearing shall be held within 45 days. An applicant shall complete the presentation of his case-in-chief within 100 days of the first hearing. Upon the request of the applicant, the Board or hearing officer shall assure that the applicant receives at least seven hours of hearings within the 100 days, including the first hearing. Persons opposed to the application shall complete the presentation of their opposition to the application within 100 days of the first hearing held after the completion of the applicant's case-in-chief. And the applicant may, upon request, be granted additional hearings to complete his case-in-chief provided the persons opposed to the application are granted an equal number of additional hearings. Persons opposed to the application may, upon the written consent or consent on the record by the applicant and municipality, be granted additional hearings to complete their opposition to the application provided the applicant is granted an equal number of additional hearings for rebuttal.
[Amended 7-13-2020 by Ord. No. 2020-01]
D.
The Board of Supervisors shall render a written decision or, when no decision is called for, make written findings on the conditional use application within 45 days after the last hearing before the Board of Supervisors. Where the application is contested or denied, each decision shall be accompanied by findings of fact or conclusions based thereon, together with any reasons therefor. Conclusions based on any provisions of this chapter or of any ordinance, rule or regulation shall contain a reference to the provision relied on and the reasons why the conclusion is deemed appropriate in the light of the facts found.
[Amended 7-13-2020 by Ord. No. 2020-01]
E.
Conditional uses in C, AC, and R-1 Districts. The following shall apply to conditional uses as authorized in the aforementioned districts, excluding home occupations.
[Added 10-9-2012 by Ord. No. 2012-02]
(1)
Where the lot on which the use is proposed fronts on or bears legal access to a collector street, the Board may require the limitation of access to the collector street in order to minimize extraordinary impact to local streets.
(2)
Where a specific setback is not otherwise required by the respective use section within this article, the principal use shall be set back 100 feet from adjoining properties zoned as C, AC, or R-1. The setback shall include buffer yards as may be required by this article. The Board of Supervisors, in concert with the conditional use approval, may approve the reduction of the required buffer yards and reduction of the aforementioned setback by up to 50%, but not less than the applicable setback otherwise required in the respective zoning district, provided that the Board finds that such reduction will not be adverse to the public health, safety, and welfare in consideration of the following:
(3)
Noise. The Board may require the applicant to submit a noise study where ongoing operations of the proposed use, including but not limited to principal or accessory activities and events, compressors, or operation of machinery or equipment associated with the proposed use where noise associated with the preceding is not customarily associated with principal uses permitted as of right within the respective zoning district.
(a)
The study shall establish by generally accepted testing procedures the continuous seventy-two-hour ambient noise level at the nearest property line or 50 feet from the nearest dwelling, whichever point is closer to the affected dwelling. In lieu of the establishment of the ambient noise level established by the continuous seventy-two-hour test the applicant may assume and use, for the purpose of compliance with this chapter, a default ambient noise level of 55 dBA. The sound level meter used in conducting any evaluation shall meet the American National Standard Institute's standard for sound meters or an instrument and the associated recording and analyzing equipment, which will provide equivalent data.
(b)
The study shall evaluate the necessity of sound mitigation devices. Where such devices are necessary to address sound levels that would otherwise exceed the aforementioned noise level standards, the study shall propose and detail the installation of sound mitigation devices sufficient to ensure that sound does not exceed the average ambient noise level established by more than five decibels for more than 10 minutes within any one hour; or that such does not exceed the levels required by § 185-64 when applied to oil and gas operations.
(c)
The applicant shall execute an agreement with the Township in a form acceptable to the Township Solicitor in which a schedule of noise tests are performed at the expense of the applicant and in which the applicant agrees to modify installed sound mitigation devices in a manner necessary to ensure that the sound level does not exceed the authorized level.