The Planned Redevelopment District (PRD) is a floating zone. That means that while regulations are adopted to govern any development within a PRD, no such district is pre-mapped on the City's Official Zoning Map. The PRD is intended to permit master planned developments that the City Council determines are consistent with the Pocomoke City Comprehensive Plan, meet the requirements for PRDs in the Pocomoke City Zoning Ordinance and that are consistent with the following purposes:
A.
Accommodate growth in older sections of Pocomoke City by encouraging and facilitating new development on vacant, bypassed and underutilized land.
B.
Encourage efficient use of land and public services.
C.
Stimulate development investment in areas suffering from economic and/or structural decline.
D.
Encourage investment in infill and redevelopment projects by providing flexible development standards that permit innovative design solutions.
E.
Create high-quality neighborhoods.
F.
Implement the goals, objectives, and policies of the Pocomoke City Comprehensive Plan.
G.
Encourage compact mixed-use development that is pedestrian-scaled.
The PRD does not give any entitlements to develop, but permits development and land use pursuant to an approved Master Development Plan that meets the requirements of the Pocomoke City Zoning Ordinance and that is approved by the City Council at the time the PRD is applied to specific parcels of land. It is further the intent of the PRD to permit flexible development standards for projects. Subject to the specific standards applicable to PRDs, flexible development standards to increase density, reduce lot areas, widths and yards, increase minimum building dimension and allow limited nonresidential uses may be permitted at the discretion of the Mayor and Council subject to proof of good cause and benefit to the development and the community, and upon recommendation by the Planning Commission. Building height and coverage may vary so long as the project average is consistent with the neighborhood scale, fits with best examples of local architecture patterns, and does not constitute a disruptive condition to the identity of the area. |