[HISTORY: Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lewes 7-13-2020. Amendments
noted where applicable.]
A "beneficial use appeal" is a process by which the City of
Lewes evaluates an allegation that no beneficial use remains in property
and determines that some level of relief from the regulations imposed
by this Code, or a determination made by the City, either on their
face or as applied, is warranted.
A property owner who alleges that the application of the regulations imposed by this Code, including Chapters 70, 170, and 197, or any final determination by the City, denies all, or substantially all, economically viable use of property may apply for relief under this chapter after exhausting all other available avenues of appeal (including, but not limited to, variance requests to the Board of Adjustment, also serving as the Board of Building Code Appeals under Chapter 70).
A.Â
Filing. Applications shall be filed with the City Manager. The City
Manager may provide forms to facilitate application processing.
B.Â
Fee. The City Council shall establish a fee schedule in an amount
large enough to cover all publication and administrative costs.
C.Â
Content. Applications shall be made in writing and shall provide
the following information:
(1)Â
Information about the owner and applicant;
(2)Â
If applicable, documentation of the purchase date and price of the
property;
(3)Â
If involving real property, a description of the physical features
of the property, total acreage, and present use, the use of the property
at the time of the adoption of the land use regulation, amendment
thereto, or determination that is in question, and any known prior
uses;
(4)Â
A description of the specific portions of this Code or any determination
that allegedly eliminates all or substantially all economically viable
use of the property, whether on its face or as applied by the City,
together with all appraisals, studies, any other supporting evidence,
and any actions taken by the City related to the property;
(5)Â
A description of the use that the property owner believes represents
the minimum beneficial use of the property and all documentation,
studies, and other evidence supporting that position;
(6)Â
If the property has been listed for sale since the adoption of the
regulation, amendment thereto, or determination in question, originals
or copies of all bids, offers to purchase, and other correspondence
regarding the sale of such property;
(7)Â
If applicable, plans or drawings that support or clarify the relief
or permission requested; and
(8)Â
Other information requested by the Board of Adjustment and, in a
case involving real property, the Building Official, including, but
not limited to, survey information.
Every applicant shall have the burden of presenting the information
needed by the Board of Adjustment to make a beneficial determination
of use. The applicant shall have the burden of proof to demonstrate
that relief from the regulation or determination is warranted.
A.Â
Scheduling. The Board of Adjustment shall schedule a public hearing.
B.Â
Public notice.
(1)Â
Newspaper notice. The City shall advertise the public hearing in
a newspaper of general circulation. The notice shall appear at least
15 calendar days prior to the public hearing date and shall contain
the following information:
(a)Â
The type of application;
(b)Â
A short description of the proposed action;
(c)Â
If involving real property, a description of the parcel and
the approximate street location or address;
(d)Â
The location, date, and time of the public hearing; and
(e)Â
Information on where full details of the application may be
obtained, including the hours of availability and phone number.
(2)Â
Notice to owner/applicant. The City shall notify the owner and/or
applicant by mail or other means reasonably calculated to give actual
notice of the time and place of the hearing.
C.Â
Public hearing. The hearing shall take place no fewer than 15 days
following publication of the legal notice.
In determining if a property owner has been deprived of the
beneficial use of property, the Board of Adjustment shall take into
account the following factors:
A.Â
Diminution in value. The property value, prior to the adoption of
the regulation, amendment thereto, or determination in question, shall
be compared to the property value with the regulation or determination
as applied. A mere decrease in value does not deprive the property
owner of all or substantially all beneficial use of property. The
diminution in value must be such that it effectively deprives the
property owner of all or substantially all viable use or enjoyment
of the property;
B.Â
Common land uses for real property. A use common to the City and/or
the area of the subject site, although it may not involve further
development of the land, may be considered a beneficial use. Attention
shall also be given to land uses considered to be the lowest intensity
in the City or adjoining areas, but which uses still provide for occupation,
use, or living by the property owner;
C.Â
Subsidy. A minimum beneficial use of the property may be a use where
a governmental subsidy is provided. If such a subsidy exists, its
value should be reflected in the considered minimum beneficial use.
The cumulative public costs of a subsidy should be considered payment
to the property owner for the restriction of the property if the subsidy
enhances the economic return of the existing use to the property owner.
The value of the proposed use shall be adjusted to reflect the degree
to which a subsidy enhances the property value;
D.Â
Adverse impacts. The extent to which the regulation or determination
protects users, future users, or neighbors from threats to health,
safety, or general welfare shall be considered. A use that seriously
threatens the health, safety, or general welfare of current or future
residents or neighbors shall not be considered a use the property
owner is entitled to enjoy and shall not, when restricted by the regulation
or determination, constitute a denial of all or substantially all
economic viable use of the property;
E.Â
Expectations. Expectations shall, in general, not be considered.
Only expectations backed by reasonable investments made prior to the
introduction date of the regulation or determination in question may
be considered;
F.Â
Nuisances. In no case shall a use that is a nuisance per se, or a
use that in that particular location constitutes a nuisance, constitute
grounds for relief; and
G.Â
Other. The Board of Adjustment may also take into account any factors
that have been considered by a federal court or a Delaware court in
determining whether all, or substantially all, economic use of property
has been denied a property owner who has made a takings claim pursuant
to the Federal or State Constitution.
A.Â
If the finding is that a property owner has been denied all or substantially
all economic viable use of the property, the Board of Adjustment shall
grant relief. In the alternative, the Board of Adjustment may find
that some beneficial use of the property remains. The Board of Adjustment
shall grant only that level of relief necessary to provide for a beneficial
use of the property.
B.Â
Minimum increase. In granting relief, the property owner shall be
given the minimum increase in use intensity or other possible concessions
from the regulation or determination to permit a beneficial use of
the land. The following guidelines shall be used to determine the
minimum beneficial use of the property:
(1)Â
For real property, the reality of limited development potential,
given the natural condition of the property, shall not be attributed
to the regulation or determination applied to the property.
(2)Â
The potential for damages to either future residents or property
shall be assessed in determining a beneficial use. Conditions shall
be placed on property where damage from hazardous conditions is likely.
The conditions may include location restrictions, size limitations,
increased standards, and other pertinent factors.