This article shall be known as the city code of ethics and conduct for city officials.
(Ordinance 18-O-108, sec. 1.02.070, adopted 10/22/2018)
(a) 
The citizens and the businesses of the city are entitled to have fair, ethical and accountable local government which earns the public’s trust and full confidence for integrity. The strong desire of the city to fulfill this expectation therefore requires that the city officials, both elected and appointed, shall:
(1) 
Comply with both the letter and spirit of the laws and policies affecting the operations of government;
(2) 
Be independent, impartial and fair in their judgment and actions;
(3) 
Use their respective office or position for the public good, not for personal gain;
(4) 
All board, commission, committee or advisory committee members will serve at the pleasure of the city council and may be removed at any time by an affirmative vote by the majority of the council unless otherwise provided by state law;
(5) 
Each board, commission or committee member will acquaint themselves with the city council’s comprehensive plan and vision for the city;
(6) 
If elected or appointed, each council, board, commission or committee member, by accepting such appointment, will agree to support the comprehensive plan comprehensive plan [sic] and the council’s vision, goals and objectives for the city in their appointed role; and
(7) 
All board, commission, committee or advisory committee members and future members must read and review the ethics code, and sign the statement in attachment B to Ordinance 18-O-108. An applicant for a board, commission, committee, or advisory committee shall sign the statement that the applicant has read and reviewed the ethics code and attach the statement to an application for the board, commission, committee or advisory committee.
(b) 
To this end, the city council has adopted this code of ethics and rules of conduct for city officials, in order to assure public confidence in the integrity of local government and its effective and fair operations.
(Ordinance 18-O-108, sec. 1.02.071, adopted 10/22/2018)
The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the following meanings subscribed to them:
Business.
A corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship, firm, holding company, joint stock company, receivership, trust or any other for-profit or not-for-profit entity.
City council.
The legislative and governing body of the city council members.
City official.
Any members of the city council, city officers and any appointed member of a city board, commission, committee, or advisory committee set up by ordinance, resolution, charter, state law or otherwise, on a temporary or permanent basis.
Legislative process.
The processes and rules of order established by the city council that include the provisions of the code of ethics and rules of conduct in section 2.05.004(1) through (17).
Nepotism.
Showing favoritism to a relative. No person related within the first degree of affinity (relationship by marriage or ties other than those of blood) or the second degree by consanguinity (relationship by a common ancestor; kinship) to any member of the city council or the city manager shall serve on the board, commission, committee or advisory committee appointed by the city council, including an ad hoc or special purpose committee.
(Ordinance 18-O-108, sec. 1.02.072, adopted 10/22/2018; Ordinance adopting 2023 Code)
City officials shall comply with the following provisions:
(1) 
Act in public interest.
Recognizing that stewardship of the public interest must be their primary concern, city officials shall work for the common good of the people of the city and not for any private or personal interest, and shall assure fair and equal treatment of all persons, claims, and transactions coming before the city council, boards, commissions, committees and advisory committees.
(2) 
Comply with the law.
City officials shall comply with the laws of the nation, the State of Texas, and the city in the performance of their public duties. These laws include, but are not limited to: the United States and Texas Constitutions; laws pertaining to conflicts of interest, election campaigns, financial disclosures, employer responsibilities, and open processes of government; and city ordinances, resolutions, and policies.
(3) 
Conduct of city officials.
The professional and personal conduct of city officials must be above reproach and avoid even the appearance of impropriety. City officials shall refrain from abusive conduct, personal charges, or verbal attack upon the character or other motives of other city officials or employees, [and members of] boards, commissions, committees, and citizen advisory committees.
(4) 
Respect for process.
City officials shall perform their duties in accordance with the processes and rules of order established by the city council and boards, commissions and committees and advisory committees governing the public deliberation of the public policy issues, meaningful involvement of the public, and implementation of policy decisions of the city council. City officials shall not interfere with the legislative process.
(5) 
Conduct of public meetings.
City officials have an obligation to attend meetings and be prepared for public issues, to listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions before the body, and to focus on the business at hand. They shall refrain from interrupting other speakers, making personal comments not germane to the business of the body or otherwise interfering with the orderly conduct of the meeting.
(6) 
Decision based on merit.
It is expected and required that city officials review material, participate in discussion and base their decision on the merits and substance of the matter at hand.
(7) 
Communication.
Prior to permitting final action on a matter under consideration, city officials shall publicly share information which they may have received from sources outside of the public decision-making process, that is relevant to such action by the council, boards, commissions, committees or advisory committees.
(8) 
Conflicts of interest and disclosure.
City officials shall familiarize themselves with and abide by the following conflicts of interest and disclosure statutes and principles:
(A) 
Chapter 171 of the Local Government Code requires a city official to file an affidavit disclosing substantial interest in a business or property that would be beneficially affected by a decision of the governing body or of any other board or commission upon which the member serves and thereafter to abstain from participation in discussion and voting on the matter. Once the disclosure is made the city official is to remove himself from the meeting area to ensure his presence does not hinder the discussion of the item or influence of the vote.
(B) 
Section 212.017 of the Local Government Code which requires city officials to file an affidavit disclosing a substantial interest in a subdivided tract.
(C) 
Chapter 176 of the Local Government Code requires the city council and the city manager to file a conflicts disclosure statement disclosing any business relationship with a person or business doing business with the city being considered by the city for a business relationship.
(D) 
Section 176.003(a)(2)(B) of the Local Government Code requires the disclosure of gifts of aggregate value of more than $250.00 in the 12-month period preceding the date that the local government officer becomes aware of a transaction described in chapter 176, other than gifts, food, lodging, transportation, or entertainment accepted as a guest.
(E) 
Sections 553.001 through 553.003 of the Government Code require the filing of an affidavit before the date the city will acquire a property in which the city official has a legal or equitable interest.
(F) 
In order to ensure independence and impartiality on behalf of the public good, city officials are prohibited from using their positions to influence government decisions in which they have a personal interest.
(9) 
Corruption.
City officials shall familiarize themselves with and abide by the Texas Penal Code mandates concerning corruption, including, without limitation, chapter 36, Bribery and Corrupt Influence, section 36.02, Bribery, prohibiting receipt of prohibited gifts, section 36.03, Coercion of Public Servant, section 36.04, Improper Influence, section 36.05, Tampering with a Witness, section 36.06, Obstruction or Retaliation, section 36.07, Acceptance of Honorarium, section 36.08, Gift to Public Servant, and section 36.09, Offering Gift to Public Servant, and chapter 39, Abuse of Office, section 39.02, Abuse of Official Capacity, section 39.03, Official Oppression, and section 39.06, Misuse of Official Information, and all other applicable state laws regulating or related to public services.
(10) 
Political advocacy.
City officials shall not utilize the city’s name or logo for purposes of endorsing any political candidate, business, proposition or measure.
(11) 
Confidential information.
City officials shall respect the confidentiality of information concerning city property, personnel, or proceedings of the city. City officials shall neither disclose confidential information without proper legal authorization, nor use such information to advance their personal interest.
(12) 
Use of public resources.
City officials shall not use public resources generally unavailable to the public, such as city staff time, equipment, supplies or facilities, for private gain or personal purposes unless authorized by council action.
(13) 
Representation of private interests.
In keeping with their role as stewards of the public interest, city officials shall not appear on behalf of private interests of third parties before the council or any board, commission, committee, or proceeding of the city.
(14) 
Advocacy.
City officials shall represent the official policies or positions of the city council, board, commission, committee, or advisory group to the best of their ability when designated as a delegate for this purpose. When presenting their individual opinions and positions, city officials shall explicitly state that they do not represent the city council, board, commission or committee of the city, nor will they allow the interference [inference] that the city official is the representative.
(15) 
Policy role of city officials.
City officials shall respect and adhere to the city governmental structure as outlined in the city’s policies and procedures and this code of ethics and rules of conduct. In this structure, the city council determines the policies of the city with the advice, information and analysis provided by the public boards, commissions, committees, advisory committees, city staff, city attorney and city consultants. Except as provided by city ordinance or resolution, city officials, therefore, shall not interfere with the administrative functions of the city or the professional duties of the city staff, nor shall they impair the ability of staff to implement council action. The mayor shall directly supervise the following municipal officers: the city manager, city secretary, municipal court administrator, finance director, chief of police and code enforcement officer, as provided for in the city employee handbook.
(16) 
Independence of boards, commissions, committees and advisory committees.
Because of the value of the independent advice of boards, commissions, committees, or advisory committees to the public decision-making process, city officials shall refrain from using their position to influence unduly the deliberations or outcomes of boards, commissions, committees, or advisory committees.
(17) 
Positive, safe and harassment-free workplace environment.
City officials shall support the maintenance of a positive and constructive workplace environment for the city employees and for citizens and businesses dealing with the city. City officials shall recognize their special role in dealing with the city employees and refrain from creating the perception of inappropriate direction to the staff.
(18) 
Implementation.
An expression of the standards of conduct for the city officials expected by the city, the city code of ethics and rules of conduct is intended to be self-enforcing. It therefore becomes effective when city officials are thoroughly familiar with it and embrace its provisions. Ethical standards shall be included in the regular orientations for candidates for city council, applicants to boards, commissions, committees, or advisory committees, and newly elected and appointed officials. City officials entering office, including those appointed to [to office,] shall sign the statement in attachment B to Ordinance 18-O-108 affirming they have read and understood the city code of ethics and rules of conduct [and] to agree to be bound by its terms. In addition, the code of ethics and rules of conduct shall be reviewed periodically by the city council, boards, commissions, committees, advisory groups, employees and citizens for revision as necessary.
(Ordinance 18-O-108, sec. 1.02.073, adopted 10/22/2018; Ordinance 19-O-36 adopted 6/10/2019; Ordinance adopting 2023 Code)
The city code of ethics and rules of conduct expresses standards of ethical conduct expected for the city officials, the city council, and boards, commissions, committees, or advisory committees. City officials themselves have the primary responsibility to assure that ethical standards are understood and met, and then the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government. The chairs of boards, commissions, and committees and the mayor have the additional responsibility to intervene when city officials’ actions appear to be in violation of the code of ethics and rules of conduct and are brought to their attention.
(Ordinance 18-O-108, sec. 1.02.074, adopted 10/22/2018)
(a) 
The city council may impose sanctions, such as a reprimand, formal censure or loss of appointment, on city officials whose conduct does not comply with the code of ethics and rules of conduct.
(b) 
The city council may also remove members of boards, commissions, committees, and advisory committees from the board, commission, committee, or advisory committee in accordance with city council procedures and subject to the limitations set forth in state law.
(Ordinance 18-O-108, sec. 1.02.075, adopted 10/22/2018)
(a) 
Upon good faith belief that a city official has violated any term or provision of the code of ethics and rules of conduct, a party having such good belief that a violation has occurred and wishing to initiate a formal review of the alleged violation shall file a written complaint with the city secretary. The written complaint shall contain:
(1) 
The name of the complaining party (hereinafter complainant);
(2) 
The name of the party [against] whom against the complaint is being filed (hereinafter the respondent);
(3) 
The specific sections of this code allegedly violated;
(4) 
Specific dates, approximate times of day, locations and other facts evidencing the alleged violations; and
(5) 
Any documentation evidencing that a violation of the handbook had occurred.
(b) 
Upon receipt of a written complaint meeting all of the requirements set forth in the preceding subsection, the city secretary shall put the complaint on the next city council meeting agenda for which posting requirements may legally and procedurally be met. Alternatively, if the complaint does not meet all the requirements set forth in the preceding subsection, the city secretary shall notify the complainant in writing of the nature of the deficiency and no further action by the city secretary or the council shall be necessary, until such time the city secretary can determine if the complaint meets the requirements of this section.
(c) 
Once placed upon the city council agenda, the scope of the city council review shall be limited to a determination of whether the complaint on its face presents of violation of this code of ethics and conduct for which sanctions, such as reprimand, formal censure, or loss of appointment, would be appropriate in order to serve the legitimate goal of orderly governance, integrity, and public confidence in government. Upon a majority vote of the city council that the complaint warrants further review and investigation, an item shall be placed on the next available regular city council meeting agenda for which posting requirements may be legally and formally met. Additionally upon majority vote the city council may specify any and all individual items of grievance from the complaint that merit such review and investigation that will be considered by the city council at subsequent hearing on the matter.
(d) 
At least seven (7) days prior to the hearing date, the city secretary shall notify the respondent in writing of the date, time, and place at which the council will conduct a hearing on the merits of the alleged complaint, and if the city council by majority vote has specified individual items for review and investigation at the hearing such notice shall advise the respondent of the scope of the hearing. Alternatively, if upon its review upon the face of the complaint on its face [sic] a majority vote of city council determines that further review and investigation is not warranted, then the complainant shall be notified in writing of such vote, the written complaint shall be returned to the complainant, and no further action shall be required. At the subsequent council hearing, the complainant and respondent may present testimonial and/or documentary evidence regarding the allegations contained in the complaint. If council determines that substantial evidence has been presented to support the allegation of [violation of the] handbook has occurred and is detrimental to the orderly governance, integrity, and public confidence in the city government, then the city council by a majority vote may impose sanctions, such as reprimand, formal censures, or loss of appointment, as determined appropriate to serve legitimate goals of this policy.
(e) 
All procedural rules of the council shall apply to proceedings conducted pursuant to this section. The complaint procedure specified in this section shall only be applicable to those city officials who are appointed and for the conduct of such official that occurs during the official’s term of office on the city board, commission, committee, or advisory committee.
(Ordinance 18-O-108, sec. 1.02.076, adopted 10/22/2018)
The mayor or any city council member may be removed from office in accordance with section 21.026 of the Texas Local Government Code for violations of the city code of ethics and rules of conduct.
(Ordinance 18-O-108, sec. 1.02.077, adopted 10/22/2018)
It is an offense to violate any section of this code. A complaint may be filed in the city municipal court for violations of the city code of ethics and rules of conduct.
(Ordinance 18-O-108, sec. 1.02.078, adopted 10/22/2018)