In order to implement the goals and objectives of the city general plan, and consistent with the exercise of its police power, and to mitigate impacts caused by new development within the city, capital facility fees are necessary. The fees are needed to finance public facilities and to assure that new development pays its fair share for these necessary improvements.
A.
The city's general police power, Article 11, Section 7, of the California Constitution, and the "Mitigation Fee Act" set forth in Government Code Section 66000 et seq., provide that public facilities fees may be enacted and imposed on development projects. The city council finds and determines that:
1.
New development projects cause the need for construction, expansion or improvements of public facilities within the city of Waterford;
2.
Funds for construction, expansion or improvement of public facilities are not currently available, nor are likely to be available, to accommodate needs caused by development projects and this has, and will, result in inadequate facilities within the city of Waterford.
B.
The city council finds that the public health, safety, peace, morals, convenience, comfort, prosperity and general welfare will be promoted by the adoption of public facilities fees for construction, expansion or improvement of public facilities.
C.
The city council finds that the failure to enact public facilities fees will subject city residents to conditions perilous to their health and/or safety and their general welfare.
D.
The city retained professional consulting firms to study the fiscal impacts of growth in the city of Waterford and to study the capital facilities needed to serve the projected growth ("the studies").
E.
The studies determined facilities needs of the city that include needs generated and needed by, residents of the existing city limits and the prospective new annexation area of the city.
F.
The city council finds that this chapter properly limits the use of all fees collected to public facilities and improvements attributable to new development, and further limits use of fees to specific categories of facilities and improvements until and unless subsequent evidence justifies reallocation.
G.
The city council finds that pursuant to the express policies set forth in the Waterford city general plan, new development is to pay its fair share for new public facilities generated as a result of the new development, otherwise the cost of these facilities or the failure to provide such facilities will be disproportionate, and unfairly borne, by other city taxpayers, or will unfairly reduce the level of service provided to present city residents.
H.
Even though development projects for the purpose of affordable housing and projects that are for secondary dwelling units on existing single-family lots may also contribute to the need for certain public facilities, the city council will not impose fees for these development projects and finds that affordable housing units and secondary dwell-ing units provide a cost-effective means of provid-ing housing necessary for low and moderate income households without public subsidy.
I.
The city council finds that the provisions of this chapter are consistent with the requirements set forth in Government Code Section 66007(b), and the California Constitution, Article 11, Section 7.
(Ord. 07-04 §1, 2007; Ord. 2015-08 §1)