A.
The city council of the city of Waterford shall hear and decide appeals and requests for variances from the requirements of this chapter.
B.
The city council shall hear and decide appeals when it is alleged there is an error in any requirement, decision or determination made by the floodplain administrator in the enforcement or administration of this chapter.
C.
In passing upon such applications, the city council shall consider all technical evaluations, all relevant factors, standards specified in other sections of this chapter, and:
1.
The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others;
2.
The danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage;
3.
The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner;
4.
The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community;
5.
The availability of alternative locations for the proposed use, which are not subject to flooding or erosion damage;
6.
The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development;
7.
The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and floodplain management program for that area;
8.
The safety of access to the property in time of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles;
9.
The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the floodwaters expected at the site; and
10.
The costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions, including maintenance and repair of public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems, and streets and bridges.
D.
Nature of Variances. The variance criteria set forth in this section of the ordinance are based on the general principle of zoning law that variances pertain to a piece of property and are not personal in nature. A variance may be granted for a parcel of property with physical characteristics so unusual that complying with the requirements of this chapter would create an exceptional hardship to the applicant or the surrounding property owners. The characteristics must be unique to the property and not be shared by adjacent parcels. The unique characteristic must pertain to the land itself, not the structure, its inhabitants, or the property owners.
It is the duty of the city council to help protect its citizens from flooding. This need is so compelling and the implications of the cost of insuring a structure built below flood level is so serious that variances from the flood elevation or from other requirements in the flood ordinance are quite rare. The long term goal of preventing and reducing flood loss and damage can only be met if variances are strictly limited. Therefore, the variance guidelines provided in this chapter are more detailed and contain multiple provisions that must be met before a variance can be properly granted. The criteria are designed to screen out those situations in which alternatives other than a variance are more appropriate.
E.
Generally, variances may be issued for new construction and substantial improvements to be erected on a lot of one-half acre or less in size contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below the base flood level, providing items 15.32.200(C)(1) through (10) have been fully considered. As the lot size increases beyond one-half acre, the technical justification required for issuing the variance increases.
F.
Upon consideration of the factors of subsection C of this section and the purposes of this chapter, the city council may attach such conditions to the granting of variances as it deems necessary to further the purposes of this chapter.
G.
The floodplain administrator shall maintain the records of all appeal actions and report any variances to the Federal Insurance Administration upon request.
(Ord. 88-3, 1988; Ord. 02-01, 2002)