In order to approve a tentative map and adopt conditions of approval in compliance with Section
18.02.230, or to deny a tentative map, the findings required by this section shall first be made for subdivisions of four or fewer parcels by the planning commission, and for subdivisions of five or more parcels by the city council. In determining whether to approve a tentative map, the city shall apply only those titles, policies, and standards in effect at the date the department determined that the application was complete in compliance with Section
18.02.120 of this chapter, except where the city has initiated general plan, specific plan or zoning ordinance changes and provided public notice as required by Map Act Section 66474.2.
A. Required Findings for Approval. The following findings shall be required, at minimum, to enable approval of a tentative map by the planning commission or city council. The findings shall apply to each proposed parcel as well as the entire subdivision, including any parcel identified as a designated remainder in compliance with Map Act Section 66424.6.
1. The proposed subdivision, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the Buellton city general plan and any applicable specific plan.
2. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed.
3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not likely cause serious public health problems.
6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision; or that substantially equivalent alternate easements are provided.
7. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.
8. Proposed street names are consistent with the types of names used elsewhere in the community and, where applicable, are logical extensions of those existing in the area of the subdivision.
9. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of this title, and the Buellton zoning ordinance, including, but not limited to, minimum lot area requirements, any other applicable provisions of this code, and the Subdivision Map Act.
B. Supplemental Findings. In addition to the findings required for approval of a tentative map by subsection
A of this section, the following findings are also required when they are applicable to the specific subdivision proposal.
1. It is in the interest of the public health and safety, and it is necessary as a prerequisite to the orderly development of the surrounding area, to require the construction of road improvements within a specified time after recordation of the parcel map, where road improvements are required (see Section
18.10.400(A)).
2. Any findings required by Section
18.06.310 for condominium conversions.
3. If the proposed subdivision fronts upon the Santa Ynez River, in an area without available reasonable public access as defined by Chapter 4, Article 3.5 of the Map Act, the proposed subdivision will provide access in compliance with Chapter 4, Article 3.5 of the Map Act.
C. Findings for Waiver of Parcel Map. If waiver of a parcel map has been requested with the tentative map application, the approval body shall determine whether the findings required by Section
18.04.110 of this title can also be made.
D. Findings Requiring Denial. A tentative map shall be denied if the planning commission or city council (as applicable) makes any of the following findings:
1. The proposed subdivision including design and improvements is not consistent with the Buellton city general plan or any applicable specific plan.
2. The site is not physically suitable for the type or proposed density of development.
3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems.
5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. This finding may not be made if the review body finds that alternate easements for access or use will be provided, and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This finding shall apply only to easements of record, or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, and no authority is granted to the review body to determine that the public at large has acquired easements of access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community sewer system would result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.
7. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with all applicable provisions of this title, the Buellton zoning ordinance, any other applicable provisions of this code, and the Subdivision Map Act.
E. Findings That May Justify Denial. A tentative map may be denied if the planning commission or city council (as applicable) makes any of the following findings:
1. The tentative map is not in conformity with accepted planning or engineering standards.
2. The environmental, public services or facilities costs to city taxpayers outweigh the advantages created by the proposed subdivision.
3. The proposed development is not compatible with the character of the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is in an area not desirable for the intensive use proposed.
5. A preliminary soils report or geological hazard report indicates adverse soil or geological conditions and the subdivider has failed to provide sufficient information to the satisfaction of the city engineer, planning commission or city council that such conditions can be corrected in the plan for the development.
(Prior code § 18.02.220; Ord. 94-16, 1994)