A.
Plastic solid waste that is nondegradable or nonrecyclable poses an acute problem for any environmentally and financially responsible solid waste management program, according to a Plastics White Paper issued by the State of California Integrated Waste Management Board[1]. Such waste covers the City's streets, parks, public places and open spaces and results in environmental damage and disruption of the ecological balance.
[1]
State of California Integrated Waste Management Board. 2003. Plastics White Paper: Optimizing Plastics Use, Recycling, and Disposal in California.
B.
Products which are biodegradable/compostable or recyclable offer environmentally sound alternatives to nondegradable and nonrecyclable products currently in use. By decaying into their constituent substances, biodegradable and compostable products, compared to their nondegradable equivalents, are less of a danger to the natural environment and less of a permanent blight on the City's landscape.
C.
The release of chlorofluorocarbons ("CFCs") into the environment may endanger public health and welfare by causing or contributing to significant depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer, leading to increased penetration of ultraviolet radiation into the atmosphere. CFCs are manufactured chemicals that remain in the atmosphere for decades, slowly migrating upwards without reacting with any other chemicals.
D.
The widespread use of CFC-processed food packaging poses a threat by the introduction of toxic byproducts into the atmosphere and environment of the City. Restricting the sale of CFC-processed food packaging in retail food establishments in the City would contribute to slowing ozone loss and greenhouse gas buildup, thereby protecting the public health.
E.
In addition to emitting CFCs, plastic food service items take hundreds of years to decompose and cannot be recycled. However, these food packaging items can be and are made from other materials, such as recycled or virgin paper, and other biodegradable products which are not made using CFCs.
F.
Polystyrene is a petroleum processing by-product. Oil is a nonrenewable resource obtained by increasingly hazardous methods including offshore drilling, which poses significant dangers to the environment. Alternative products which are biodegradable or recyclable pose fewer overall hazards than continued and expanded reliance on oil-based products.
G.
Take-out food packaging constitutes the single greatest source of litter in the City and is a significant contributor to the total amount of waste entering the City's waste stream. Minimizing the amount of disposable straws given out to customers and providing recyclable or compostable food wares will help reduce the amount of harmful plastic litter that ends up on our streets, in our storm drains and on our beaches, thus furthering the health, safety and welfare of the City.
H.
Reduction of the amount of nondegradable and nonrecyclable waste that enters the waste stream and encouraging the use of recyclable and/or compostable containers further this goal.
I.
J.
Approximately 10 to 20 million tons of plastic end up in the oceans each year according to a WorldWatch Institute analysis. This plastic debris results in an estimated $13,000,000,000 a year in losses from damage to marine ecosystems, including financial losses to fisheries and tourism as well as time spent cleaning beaches[4].
[4]
Worldwatch Institute. 2015. Global Plastic Production Rises, Recycling Lags. http://www.worldwatch.org/global-plastic-production-rises-recycling-lags-0
K.
The City borders the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, a Federal preserve that supports one of the most diverse and delicate marine ecosystems in the world. Eliminating the use of chlorofluorocarbons, polystyrene and other harmful materials from all establishments within the City, and promoting the transition to recyclable and compostable materials, will help protect this sanctuary.
(Ord. 89-14, 1989; Ord. 2008-05, 2008; Ord. 2017-11, 2017)