(a)
The term "nonconforming use" is defined in Chapter 23.08 PGMC to mean a use which was legal when it was created, but because of subsequent changes in regulations no longer conforms to the regulations for the district in which it is situated. "Nonconforming use" describes four types of circumstances in which a property does not conform to the regulations of the district in which it is situated:
(1)
A nonconforming building, i.e., a building or structure that does not conform because of its size, type or construction, location on the land, proximity to other buildings on the site, or its lot coverage;
(2)
A nonconforming use of conforming buildings, i.e., a situation where the building conforms but the use of the building is not permitted. An example is a duplex located on a lot currently zoned for a single-family dwelling;
(3)
A nonconforming use of nonconforming buildings, i.e., a situation where neither the building nor the use conforms. An example is a triplex which is over coverage, does not meet current parking standards and which is situated on a lot currently zoned for fewer than three units;
(4)
A nonconforming use of land, i.e., a situation wherein there are generally no buildings or structures involved and the use of land is nonconforming. An example is the storage of materials on a lot currently zoned for open space.
Combinations of the four mentioned nonconforming situations also exist, particularly in the older neighborhoods of the city. This chapter is intended to implement the policies contained in the general plan pertaining to nonconforming uses so as to encourage compliance with the city's housing code, the preservation of historical resources, and the abatement of undesirable land uses.
(Ord. 1659 N.S. § 2, 1989; Ord. 13-003 § 19, 2013)