A.
Study required.
(1)
Abbreviated traffic impact study. Whenever a proposed project will generate 50 to 99 new vehicle trips in the peak direction (inbound or outbound) during the site peak traffic hour, the applicant shall perform an abbreviated traffic impact study. Based on this study, certain improvements may be identified as necessary to provide safe and efficient access to the development. The abbreviated traffic impact study shall include:
(2)
Comprehensive traffic impact study.
(a)
Whenever a proposed project will generate 100 or more new vehicle trips in the peak direction (inbound or outbound) during the site peak traffic hour, the applicant shall perform a comprehensive traffic impact study. Based on this study, certain improvements may be identified as necessary to provide safe and efficient access to the development.
(b)
Transportation demand management measures such as staggered start and end work times, telecommuting, utilization of transit, greenway or trail linkages, park-and-ride lots, etc. may be used to reduce trip generation for the proposed development. If such measures will reduce the new vehicle trips in the peak direction during the peak traffic hour to less than 100, then an abbreviated traffic impact study may be performed in lieu of a comprehensive study. When such trip reduction measures are used to justify performance of an abbreviated study as permitted by this section, a developer and successors shall be bound by a recorded agreement to implement such measures. The terms and form of agreement shall be as mutually agreed upon by the Borough and the developers.
(3)
In addition, a comprehensive traffic impact study shall be prepared at the discretion of the Borough whenever either of the following conditions exists within the impact study area:
(a)
Current traffic problems exist in the local area, such as a high crash location, confusing intersection, or a congested intersection that directly affects access to the development.
(b)
The ability of the existing roadway system to handle increased traffic or the feasibility of improving the roadway system to handle increased traffic is limited.
B.
Traffic impact study requirements.
(1)
Area of traffic impact study. The traffic impact study area shall be based on the characteristics of the surrounding area. The intersections to be included in the study shall be adjacent to the site or have direct impact upon the access to the site. The intersections shall be mutually agreed upon by the Borough and the transportation engineer preparing the study. The Lancaster County Planning Commission shall be called upon to resolve any disputes between the Borough and the transportation engineer.
(2)
Preparation by transportation engineer required. Traffic impact studies shall be prepared by or under the supervision of qualified and experienced transportation engineers with specific training in traffic and transportation engineering and at least two years of experience related to preparing traffic studies for existing or proposed developments.
(3)
Horizon year. The traffic forecasts shall be prepared for the anticipated opening year of the development, assuming full build-out and occupancy. This year shall be referred to as the "horizon year."
(4)
Non-site traffic estimates. Estimates of non-site traffic shall be made, and will consist of through motorized and nonmotorized traffic and motorized and nonmotorized traffic generated by all other developments within the study area for which preliminary or final plans have been approved. Non-site traffic may be estimated using any one of the following three methods: "build-up" technique, area transportation plan data or modeled volumes, and trends or growth rates.
(5)
Trip generation rates required. The traffic impact study shall include a table showing the land use categories and quantities, with the corresponding trip generation rates or equations (with justification for selection of one or the other), and resulting number of trips. The trip-generation rates used must be either from the latest edition of trip generation by ITE, or from a local study of corresponding land uses and quantities. All sources must be referenced in the study.
(6)
Consideration of pass-by trips. If pass-by trips or shared trips are a major consideration for the land use in question, studies should be referenced and interviews should be conducted and documented at similar land uses.
(7)
Rate sums. Any significant difference between the sums of single-use rates and proposed mixed-use estimates must be justified and explained in the study.
(8)
Explanations required. The reasoning and data used in developing a trip generation rate for special/unusual generators must be justified and explained in the report.
(9)
Definition of influence area.
(a)
Prior to trip distribution of site-generated trips, an influence area must be defined which contains 80% or more of the trip ends that will be attracted to the development. A market study can be used to establish the limits of an influence area, if available. If no market study is available, an influence area should be estimated based on a reasonable documented estimate. The influence area can also be based on a reasonable maximum convenient travel time to the site, or delineating area boundaries based on locations of competing developments.
(b)
Other methods, such as using trip data from an existing development with similar characteristics or using an existing origin-destination survey of trips within the area, can be used in place of the influence area to delineate the boundaries of the impact.
(10)
Estimates of trip distribution required.
(b)
Whichever method is used, trip distribution must be estimated and analyzed for the horizon year. A mixed-use development may require more than one distribution and coinciding assignment for each phase (for example, residential and retail phases on the same site). Consideration must also be given to whether inbound and outbound trips will have similar distributions.
(11)
Trip assignments.
(a)
Assignments must be made considering logical routings, available roadway capacities, left turns at critical intersections, and projected (and perceived) minimum travel times. In addition, multiple paths should often be assigned between origins and destinations to achieve realistic estimates rather than assigning all of the trips to the route with the shortest travel time. The assignments must be carried through the external site access points and in large projects (those producing 500 or more additional peak direction trips to or from the site during the development's peak hour) through the internal roadways. When the site has more than one access driveway, logical routing and possible multiple paths should be used to obtain realistic driveway volumes. The assignment should reflect conditions at the time of the analysis. Assignments can be accomplished either manually or with applicable computer models.
(b)
If a thorough analysis is required to account for pass-by trips, the following procedure should be used:
(c)
Upon completion of the initial site traffic assignment, the results should be reviewed to see if the volumes appear logical given characteristics of the road system and trip distribution. Adjustments should be made if the initial results do not appear to be logical or reasonable.
(12)
Total traffic impacts. Motorized and nonmotorized traffic estimates for any site with current traffic activity must reflect not only new traffic associated with the site's redevelopment, but also the trips subtracted from the traffic stream because of the removal of a land use. The traffic impact study should clearly depict the total traffic estimate and its components.
(13)
Capacity analysis.
(a)
Capacity analysis must be performed at each of the major street and project site access intersection locations (signalized and unsignalized) within the study area. In addition, analyses must be completed for roadway segments deemed sensitive to site traffic within the study area as determined by the Borough. These may include such segments as weaving sections, ramps, internal site roadways, parking facility access points, and reservoirs for vehicles queuing on- and off-site. Other locations may be deemed appropriate depending on the situation.
(b)
The recommended level-of-service analysis procedures detailed in the most recent edition of the Highway Capacity Manual must be followed. The operational analyses in the Highway Capacity Manual should be used for analyzing existing conditions, traffic impacts, access requirements, or other future conditions for which traffic, geometric, and control parameters can be established.
(14)
Required levels of service. The recommendations of the traffic impact study shall provide safe and efficient movement of traffic to and from and within and past the proposed development, while minimizing the impact to non-site trips. The current levels of service must be maintained if they are Levels C or D, not allowed to deteriorate to worse than Level C if they are currently Levels A or B, and improved to Level D if they are Levels E or F.
(15)
Documentation required. A traffic impact study report shall be prepared to document the purpose, procedures, findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the study.
(a)
The documentation for a traffic impact study shall include, at a minimum:
[1]
Study purpose and objectives.
[2]
Description of the site and study area.
[3]
Existing roadway conditions in the area of the development.
[4]
Recorded or approved development(s) within the traffic impact study area.
[5]
Trip generation, trip distribution, and modal split.
[6]
Projected future motorized and nonmotorized traffic volumes.
[7]
An assessment of the change in roadway operating conditions resulting from the development traffic.
[8]
Recommendations for site access and transportation improvements needed to maintain and/or improve motorized and non-motorized traffic flow to, from, within, and past the site at an acceptable and safe level of service.
[9]
Transit location, availability of bike routes, connection to a park and/or trail system.
(b)
The analysis shall be presented in a straightforward and logical sequence. It shall lead the reader step by step through the various stages of the process and resulting conclusions and recommendations.
(c)
The recommendations shall specify the time period within which the improvements should be made (particularly if the improvements are associated with various phases of the development construction), and any monitoring of operating conditions and improvements that may be required. The recommendations shall also identify who will be responsible for making the improvements.
(d)
Data shall be presented in tables, graphs, maps, and diagrams wherever possible for clarity and ease of review.
(e)
To facilitate examination by the Borough, an executive summary of one or two pages shall be provided, concisely summarizing the purpose, conclusions, and recommendations.
(f)
The study documentation outlined above provides a framework for site traffic access/impact study reports. Some studies will be easily documented using this outline. However, the specific issues to be addressed, local study requirements, and the study results may warrant additional sections.
C.
Improvements. The applicant shall be responsible for the improvements required to provide safe and convenient ingress and egress to the development site.