A.
The Board of Trustees hereby finds that:
(1)
Roslyn Estates was created as a planned community by Dean Alvord, a master designer of the early twentieth century. Two of the three other communities designed by Alvord are on the National Register of Historic Places: Prospect South, Brooklyn, New York and Harbor Oaks, Clearwater, Florida. Roslyn Estates was planned with a parklike atmosphere created by winding roads, walking paths, numerous mature trees, considerable architectural diversity, and lots that conform to a complex hilly site.
(2)
One of the major distinctions between the Village of Roslyn Estates and most other planned communities is the stress on diversity of the size, shapes, and topographies of the lots, as well as the diversity of architectural design of the homes upon them.
(3)
In order to provide that protection, formal requirements have to be adopted with regard to the procedure and review by the Architectural Review Board to assure that its members can make knowledgeable decisions to assure, to the extent practicable, the continued unique character of the Village, in accordance with the plan laid out by Dean Alvord and the manner in which the Village has subsequently developed.
(4)
Sufficient power has to be given to the Architectural Review Board, with regard to its review of buildings, development, demolition, and landscaping, to assure that its members are authorized to impose the necessary restrictions on development, architectural design, the size and location of buildings, the topography of sites, the preservation of trees and shrubbery, and the planting and maintenance of new trees and shrubbery, to the extent practicable, to assure the continued unique character of the Village, in accordance with the plan laid out by Dean Alvord and the manner in which the Village has subsequently developed.
(5)
The failure to protect the existing unique plan of the Village would discourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the Village and impair the property values of all of the Village residents.
(6)
The removal of landscaping, including trees, shrubbery, and ground cover, in conjunction with new construction, without adequate replanting, screening, and provision for surface water drainage, would adversely affect the desirability of the immediate area and neighboring areas for residential and commercial purposes.
(7)
The failure to protect the existing unique plan of the Village with adequate replanting, screening, and provision for surface water drainage would impair the benefits of occupancy of existing residential and commercial property, impair the stability and value of both improved and unimproved real property, produce degeneration of residential and commercial property, with attendant deterioration of conditions affecting the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the Village and destroy a proper relationship between the taxable value of real property and the costs of municipal services provided therefor.
B.
It is the purpose of this chapter to prevent the aforesaid and other harmful effects and thus to promote and protect the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the Village.