A.
The provisions of this Part 1 are the minimum standards for the protection of the public welfare, health and safety.
B.
If the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Board of Supervisors that any mandatory provision of this Part 1 is unreasonable and causes a unique and undue hardship as it applies to his proposed project, the Board of Supervisors, upon obtaining the comments and recommendations of the municipality's engineer may, but need not, grant a waiver so that substantial justice may be done and the public interest secured, provided that such waiver will not have a negative impact on the public welfare, health and safety and, further, not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this Part 1.
C.
The applicant shall make all requests for waivers in writing and include such requests as a part of the application for development. The applicant shall state in full the grounds and facts of unreasonableness or hardship on which the request is based, the provision or provisions of this Part 1 involved and the minimum waiver necessary. The applicant shall state how the requested waiver and applicant's proposal shall result in an equal or greater means of complying with the intent of this Part 1.
D.
The Board of Supervisors shall maintain a written record of all action on all waiver requests, and each request for a waiver shall be subject to the Board's sole discretion.
E.
In granting waivers, the Board of Supervisors may impose conditions that will, in its judgment, secure substantially the objectives of the standards or requirements so modified.
F.
The applicant shall address all issues deemed relevant by the municipality, including any issues identified by the Board of Supervisors, in its application for a waiver. Some, but not all, of the issues to be addressed by the applicant are set forth below:
(1)
Are there existing stormwater problems on downstream properties or streets? The applicant shall demonstrate that the requested waiver shall improve any such problems.
(2)
Will the increased peak flows and/or volume of runoff create a problem to downstream properties or streets?
(3)
Is runoff being diverted to a different watershed to accomplish the goal of no or minimal increase of peak flow from the site?