[Adopted 2-24-2015 by L.L. No. 3-2015]
As used in this article, unless the context requires, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated:
EMPLOYEE
Any person holding a position by election, appointment or employment in the service of the City, whether or not compensated, or volunteer expressly authorized to participate in a City-sponsored volunteer program, but shall not include independent contractor. The term "employee" shall include members of all Boards and Commissions of the City. The term "employee" shall also include a former employee, his estate or judicially appointed personal representative.
Upon compliance by the employee with the provisions of § 1-20 of this chapter, the City shall provide for the defense of the employee in any civil action or proceeding in any state or federal court arising out of any alleged act or omission which occurred or is alleged in the complaint to have occurred while the employee was exercising or performing, or, in good faith purporting to exercise or perform his powers and duties within the scope of his public employment, including but not limited to any action which is brought to enforce a provision of Section 1981 or 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code. This duty to provide for defense shall not arise where such civil action or proceeding is brought by or on behalf of the City.
Subject to the conditions set forth in § 1-18 of this article, the employee shall be entitled to be represented by the City Attorney; provided, however, that the employee shall be entitled to representation by private counsel of his choice in any civil judicial proceeding whenever the City Council determines, based upon the recommendation of the City Attorney pursuant to his investigation and review of the facts and circumstances of the case that representation by the City Attorney would be inappropriate, or whenever a court of competent jurisdiction, upon appropriate motion or by a special proceeding, determines that a conflict of interest exists and that the employee is entitled to be represented by private counsel of his choice. The City Attorney shall notify the employee, in writing, of such determination that the employee is entitled to be represented by private counsel. The City Council, upon recommendation of the City Attorney, may require as a condition to payment of the fees and expenses of such representation, that appropriate groups of such employees be represented by the same counsel. If the City Council determines that the employee or group of employees is entitled to representation by private counsel under provisions of this article, the City Clerk shall so certify to the Comptroller. Reasonable attorneys' fees and litigation expenses shall be paid by the City to such private counsel from time to time during the pendency of the civil action or proceeding, subject to certification that the employee is entitled to representation under the terms and conditions of this article by the head of the department, commission, division, office or agency in which such employee is employed, upon approval of the City Attorney upon audit of the Comptroller. Any dispute with respect to representation of multiple employees by a single counsel or the amount of litigation expenses or the reasonableness of attorney's fees shall be resolved by the court upon motion or by way of a special proceeding.
Where the employee delivers process and a request for a defense to the City Attorney, as required by § 1-24 of this article, the City Attorney shall take the necessary steps, including, if appropriate, the temporary retention of private counsel on behalf of the employee, to avoid entry of a default judgment pending resolution by the City Council of any question pertaining to the obligation of the City to provide for a defense of the employee. The City Attorney shall then undertake an inquiry and review of the facts and circumstances of the case and forward his findings and recommendations to the City Council. The City Attorney shall forward therewith estimates as to what the costs would be if defense of the case were undertaken by the retention of private counsel. The City Council shall then determine whether the employee is entitled to defense by the City pursuant to § 1-18 of this article. If the City Council determines that the employee is so entitled to a defense, then the City Council shall make a determination regarding any questions as to the retention of private council pursuant to § 1-19 of this article. If the City Council determines that defense of the case by retention of private counsel is appropriate, then said determination shall include, but not be limited to, an estimate of the costs of such retention and defense. The City Council may, from time to time, upon recommendation of the City Attorney, review and reassess determinations made under this section based on additional evidence or later developments in the case.
The City shall indemnify and save harmless its employees in the amount of any judgment obtained against such employees in any state or federal court, or in the amount of any settlement of a claim, provided that the act or omission from which such judgment or settlement arose, occurred while the employee was exercising or performing, or in good faith purporting to exercise or perform his powers and duties within the scope of his public employment; the duty to indemnify and save harmless prescribed by this section shall not arise where the injury or damage resulted from ultra vires acts or recklessness on the part of the employee.
An employee represented by private counsel shall cause to be submitted to the head of the department, commission, division, office or agency in which he is employed any proposed settlement which may be subject to indemnification by the City, and, if not inconsistent with provisions of this article, such head of the department, commission, division, office or agency in which he is employed shall certify such proposed settlement and submit such proposed settlement and certification to the City Attorney. The City Attorney shall review such proposed settlement as to form and amount, and shall give his recommendation of approval to the City Council, if in his judgment the settlement is in the best interest of the City. The City Council shall review such proposed settlement, together with the certification aforesaid and the recommendation of the City Attorney and shall approve such proposed settlement if it determines it to be in the best interest of the City. Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the City to indemnify or save harmless any employee with respect to a settlement not so reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and approved by the City Council.
Upon entry of a final judgment against the employee or upon the settlement of the claim, the employee shall cause to be served a copy of such judgment or settlement, personally or by certified or registered mail, within 30 days of the date of entry or settlement, upon the head of the department, commission, division, office or agency in which he is employed, and if not inconsistent with the provisions of this article, such judgment or settlement shall be certified for payment by such head of the department, commission, division, office or agency. If the City Attorney concurs in such certification, the judgment or settlement shall be paid upon the audit by the Comptroller.
The duty to defend or indemnify and save harmless prescribed by this article shall be conditioned upon delivery to the City Attorney by the employee of the original or a copy of any summons, complaint, process, notice, demand or pleading within 10 days after he is served with such document and the full cooperation of the employee in the defense of such action or proceeding and in defense of any action or proceeding against the City, based upon the same act or omission, and in the prosecution of any appeal. Such delivery shall be deemed a request by the employee that the City provide for his defense pursuant to this article.
A. 
The benefits of this article shall inure only to employees as defined herein and shall not enlarge or diminish the rights of any other party, nor shall any provision of this article be construed to affect, alter or repeal any provision of the Workers' Compensation Law.
B. 
This article shall not in any way affect the obligation of any claimant to give notice to the City under § 50-e of the General Municipal Law or any other provision of law.
C. 
The provisions of this article shall not be construed to impair, alter, limit or modify the rights and obligations of any insurer under any policy of insurance.
D. 
The provisions of this article shall apply to all actions and proceedings pending upon the effective date thereof or thereafter instituted.
E. 
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this article, the provisions of this article shall not be construed in any way to impair, alter, limit, modify, abrogate or restrict any immunity available to or conferred upon any unit, entity, officer or employee of the City or any other level of government or any right to defense and/or indemnification provided for any governmental officer or employee by, in accordance with, or by reason of any other provisions of City, state, county or federal statutory or common law.
If any provisions of this article or the application thereof to any person or circumstance be held unconstitutional or invalid, in whole or in part, in any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding of unconstitutionality or invalidity shall in no way affect or impair any other provision of this article or the application of any such provision to any other person or circumstance.