As used in this article, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated:
ACTUAL MALICE
Ill will or improper motivation, and has the same meaning as in the Maryland Local Government Tort Claims Act (Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland, § 5-301 et seq.).
EMPLOYEE
Any person who was employed by the Town at the time of the act or omission giving rise to potential liability against that person. Only to the extent required by the Local Government Tort Claims Act or other relevant state law, "employee" includes a volunteer who was providing services or performing duties at the request of a Town official, and under the control and direction of the official.
[Ord. No. 3-88, eff. 4-17-1988; amended by Res. No. 5-19, 10-7-2019, eff. 12-12-2019 (formerly Ch. 2, § 2-201, of the 1989 Code)]
A. 
Duty to defend. Subject to the provisions of Subsection C of this section, the Town Attorney, when requested in writing by any public official or employee, shall appear and defend any civil action or special proceeding instituted in the courts of any state or of the United States against any public official or employee by reason of any act arising within the scope of his employment or authority, or by reason of any act taken in the reasonable belief that such action was within the scope of his employment or authority. The defense may be rendered by the Town Attorney or by special counsel retained by the Town Attorney. The defense of the case shall include the right to assert counterclaims and to engage in third-party practice on behalf of the official or employee.
B. 
Exceptions. Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection A hereof, the Town Attorney may decline to represent a public official or employee who retains private counsel, and shall not provide a defense for any official or employee for negligence or any other tort arising from the operation of a motor vehicle as to any claim for damages which is within the limits of any applicable policy of motor vehicle liability insurance.
C. 
Right to counsel of choice. Nothing in this section shall be construed to deprive any public official or employee of the right to select counsel of his own choice at his own expense, nor does this section prevent the Town Attorney from entering his appearance in a case to protect the interests of the Town of Somerset even though no request for such appearance has been forthcoming from the public official or employee named as a defendant.
D. 
Waiver. Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsections A and B hereof, the Town Attorney may temporarily waive the requirement that a written request be made for representation in those instances where a timely response to the action cannot be made before a written request for representation can be made.
[Ord. No. 3-88, eff. 4-17-1988 (formerly Ch. 2, § 2-202, of the 1989 Code)]
The Town Attorney, before undertaking any defense, shall conduct an investigation of the facts on which the civil action or special proceeding is based, and report his findings and recommendations to the Town Council. If the Council determines that the public official or employee was not acting within the scope of his employment, or did not reasonably believe he was acting within the scope of his employment, the Town Attorney shall provide no defense for the public official or employee. The investigation herein required may be accomplished by the Town Attorney or by any other attorney or person when directed to do so by the Town Attorney. If it appears that the public official or employee is covered by a policy of insurance under the terms of which the carrier is required to provide counsel in such actions or special proceedings, the Council may direct the Town Attorney to terminate further investigation and provide no representation for the public official or employee.
[Ord. No. 3-88, eff. 4-17-1988; amended by Res. No. 5-19, 10-7-2019, eff. 12-12-2019 (formerly Ch. 2, § 2-203, of the 1989 Code)]
If the Town Council determines, pursuant to § 5-8, not to assume the defense of a public official or employee, and it is judicially determined that the injuries arose out of an act or omission of the public official within the scope of his employment, or that the defense of sovereign immunity is available to the public official or employee, the Town of Somerset shall be liable to the public official or employee for reasonable expenses in prosecuting his own defense, including court costs and reasonable attorney's fees.
[Ord. No. 3-88, eff. 4-17-1988 (formerly Ch. 2, § 2-204, of the 1989 Code)]
If the Town Attorney advises the Council that it is impractical or uneconomical for him to render such legal services, the Town Council may employ special counsel, whose compensation shall be recommended by the Town Attorney and approved by the Town Council. The compensation for special counsel shall be paid by the Town of Somerset.
[Ord. No. 3-88, eff. 4-17-1988 (formerly Ch. 2, § 2-205, of the 1989 Code)]
Prior to the defense of any public official or employee, such public official or employee shall enter into an agreement which provides:
A. 
Reimbursement. That the Town Council, if it determines it appropriate, may require the public official or employee to reimburse the Town for all expenses, including court costs and reasonable attorney's fees, if it is judicially determined that (1) the employee acted with actual malice in committing the act or omission complained of, or (2) the injuries complained of did not arise out of an act or omission of the public official or employee occurring within the scope of his employment or authority, or by reason of an act taken in the reasonable belief that such act was within the scope of his employment or authority, and the defense of sovereign immunity as to the public official or employee is not available; but such reimbursement shall not be required if the information provided to the Town Attorney by the public official or employee was complete and was neither false nor misleading. These costs constitute a debt due the Town of Somerset and may be collected by appropriate judicial proceedings.
B. 
Town not liable for judgment. If a judgment shall be rendered against the public official or employee, the Town shall not be responsible to pay the judgment, and the legal representation of the Town Attorney or special counsel of a public official or employee in no manner constitutes an obligation on the part of the Town of Somerset to pay the judgment or a settlement of a claim, except as provided for in § 5-13 of this article.
C. 
No settlement without consent. That the Town Attorney shall not compromise or settle any claim without written consent of the public official or employee. If the public official or employee does not consent to the compromise or settlement, the Town Attorney may withdraw from the representation subject to the appropriate rules of court. In that event, the Town of Somerset is not responsible for any further costs whatsoever.
[Ord. No. 3-88, eff. 4-17-1988; amended by Ord. No. 12-20-88, eff. 12-22-1988 (formerly Ch. 2, § 2-206, of the 1989 Code)]
The consent of the Town Attorney to defend actions or proceedings against public officials and employees may not be construed to deprive the Town of Somerset or any of its agencies, boards, commissions, departments, officers or employees of sovereign immunity.
[Ord. No. 3-88, eff. 4-17-1988 (formerly Ch. 2, § 2-207, of the 1989 Code)]
In the event that a court or jury returns a special verdict in the form of a written finding determining that the public official or employee was acting within the scope of his employment, then the Town shall be required to pay (1) any judgment rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction against a public official or employee, including court costs and reasonable attorney's fees, or (2) the amount of any settlement on any claim for which the Town Attorney has undertaken a defense. The payment of any settlement or judgment shall not be construed to abrogate the sovereign immunity of the Town or deprive any agency, board, commission, department, officer, or employee thereof of its sovereign immunity. Nothing in this section is intended to waive the rights of the Town under state law to assert sovereign immunity for judgments or settlements exceeding the maximum amounts for which a municipality may be held liable or be required to pay under state law, or the right of the Town to seek indemnification from a public official or employee who has acted with actual malice in committing the act or omission complained of.
[Ord. No. 3-88, eff. 4-17-1988 (formerly Ch. 2, § 2-208, of the 1989 Code)]
A. 
When representation permitted.
(1) 
Town employees. Neither the Town Attorney nor any other counsel retained by the Town may represent a Town employee in any investigation of him by a criminal law enforcement agency, or in any criminal action against him in a court of any state or of the United States.
(2) 
Public officials. The Town Attorney or special counsel retained by the Town Council may represent a public official in an investigation of him by a criminal law enforcement agency, or in a criminal action against him in a court of any state or of the United States, only if:
(a) 
The Town Attorney or another person acting at his direction has investigated the facts on which the action is based, and reported his findings and recommendations to the Town Council;
(b) 
The Town Council determines that the public official was acting within the scope of his official duties; and
(c) 
The Town Council, in its discretion, determines that it is in the best interests of the Town to provide legal representation for the official, giving due consideration to the reasons for the official's actions, whether or not it appears that he acted in good faith, the need to encourage individuals to hold public office, and other relevant factors.
B. 
When reimbursement of expenses allowed. Subject to the limitations in Subsection C below, the Town Council may reimburse a public official or employee for reasonable counsel fees incurred by him:
(1) 
In connection with a criminal investigation into conduct as an official or employee if the investigation has concluded and criminal charges have not been filed against him; or
(2) 
In defending against criminal charges related to conduct as an officer or employee if final disposition of all the charges does not result in a plea of nolo contendere, a guilty plea, or a finding of guilt.
C. 
Reimbursement; determination by Council. The Town Council may not reimburse a public official or employee for expenses incurred in connection with a criminal investigation or defense unless:
(1) 
The official or employee submits a written application for reimbursement; and
(2) 
The Council determines:
(a) 
In connection with a matter under criminal investigation, the official or employee discharged his public responsibilities in good faith, did not engage in unlawful conduct, and was reasonable in retaining counsel and in incurring the counsel fees for which he requests reimbursement; or
(b) 
In connection with a matter which was the subject of criminal charges, the official or employee discharged his public responsibilities in good faith and incurred reasonable counsel fees.
[Ord. No. 3-88, eff. 4-17-1988 (formerly Ch. 2, § 2-209, of the 1989 Code)]