[Ord. 441, 7/2/2012]
1. 
For all regulated activities, unless preparation of an SWM site plan is specifically exempted in § 23-302:
A. 
Preparation and implementation of an approved SWM site plan is required.
B. 
No regulated activities shall commence until the Borough issues written approval of an SWM site plan which demonstrates compliance with the requirements of this chapter.
2. 
All SWM site plans for regulated activities shall include such measures as necessary to:
A. 
Protect health, safety, and property.
B. 
Meet the water quality goals of this chapter, as stated in § 23-103, by including measures that:
(1) 
Minimize disturbance to floodplains, wetlands, wooded areas, and existing vegetation.
(2) 
Maintain or extend riparian buffers.
(3) 
Avoid erosive flow conditions in natural flow pathways.
(4) 
Minimize thermal impacts to waters of the commonwealth.
(5) 
Disconnect impervious surfaces by directing runoff to pervious areas.
(6) 
Minimize soil disturbance and compaction.
C. 
Incorporate the techniques for low-impact development practices described in the Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual (BMP Manual).
3. 
Stormwater flows onto adjacent property shall not be created, increased, relocated, or otherwise altered without the written notification of the adjacent property owner(s) by the developer. Copies of all such notifications shall be included in the SWM site plan submission.
4. 
For all regulated activities where erosion and sediment control is required in accordance with Title 25 of the Pennsylvania Code and the Clean Streams Law, the SWM site plan shall include the required erosion and sedimentation control measures. Necessary E&S BMPs shall be designed in accordance with the Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual (E&S Manual) 2, No. 363-2134-008 (April 15, 2000), as amended and updated. Approval of the SWM site plan by the Borough shall be conditioned on the applicant obtaining erosion and sedimentation control approval from the appropriate agency(ies), when applicable.
5. 
For all regulated activities where NPDES permitting is required in accordance with the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. [1972], as amended), the SWM site plan shall include the information required in the applicant's NPDES permit application. Approval of the SWM site plan by the Borough shall be conditioned on the applicant obtaining NPDES permit approval from the appropriate agency(ies), when applicable.
6. 
For all regulated activities, implementation of the volume controls in § 23-304 is required.
7. 
Special Management Areas. SWM site plans involving regulated activities within special management areas shall be prepared in a manner consistent with the guidance provided in Chapter 7 of the BMP Manual. The SWM site plan submission shall include design details for SWM BMPs within said special management area.
8. 
A SWM site plan may propose that stormwater related to the proposed regulated activities be accommodated by existing stormwater management facilities on adjoining or nearby properties, provided that the SWM site plan documents the following:
A. 
The use of the stormwater management facilities located on said adjoining or nearby property is approved in writing by the owner of the property.
B. 
The stormwater management facilities located on said adjoining or nearby property are designed in a manner that can accommodate the stormwater management needs of the regulated activity in a manner consistent with all requirements of this chapter. The SWM site plan shall include all documentation necessary for the Borough to confirm such compliance.
9. 
The design storm volumes to be used in the analysis of peak rates of discharge shall be obtained from the Precipitation-Frequency Atlas of the United States, Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3.0, as amended and updated, United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service, Hydrometeorological Design Studies Center, Silver Spring, Maryland. NOAA's Atlas 14 can be accessed at http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/.
10. 
SWM site plans, once approved by the Borough, shall remain on site throughout the duration of the regulated activity and be available for review as may be necessary by representatives of the Borough.
11. 
The design of all facilities over karst shall include an evaluation of measures to minimize adverse effects.
12. 
The Borough may, after consultation with DEP, approve measures for meeting the state water quality requirements other than those in this chapter, provided that they meet the minimum requirements of, and do not conflict with, state law, including, but not limited to, the Clean Streams Law. The Borough shall maintain a record of consultations with DEP pursuant to this subsection.
[Ord. 441, 7/2/2012]
1. 
A property owner or developer of any regulated activity that meets the following exemption criteria is, upon approval from the Borough, exempt from the formal SWM plan submission requirements of this chapter as specified herein. However, the property owner or developer shall be subject to all other requirements of this chapter other than the formal SWM plan submission requirements for which an exemption or exemptions have been authorized. The criteria for exemption in this section apply to the total development proposed, including instances in which the development is proposed to take place in phases. The date of enactment of this chapter shall be the starting point from which future development and the respective exemption criteria shall be cumulatively considered and regulated.
A. 
Regulated activities that involve equal to or less than 1,000 square feet of impervious surface shall be exempted from the peak rate control, volume control and the SWM site plan preparation and submission requirements of this chapter. The applicant shall complete page 1 of the Municipal Stormwater Management Worksheet from the Stormwater Management Design Assistance Manual (see Plan Appendix C) and file said worksheet with the Borough.
B. 
Regulated activities that involve greater than 1,000 square feet and equal to or less than 5,000 square feet of impervious area, and where all the proposed impervious area can be entirely disconnected, may be exempted from the peak rate control requirements of this chapter. A SWM site plan shall be submitted to the Borough in accordance with Part 4 of this chapter. In addition, the applicant shall complete the Stormwater Management Worksheets from the Stormwater Management Design Assistance Manual (see Plan Appendix C) and file said worksheets with the Borough.
C. 
Agricultural activities shall be exempt from the rate control, volume control and SWM site plan preparation and submission requirements of this chapter, provided that the agricultural activities are performed in accordance with the requirements of 25 Pa. Code Chapter 102. Further, such activities shall not be subject to the exemption approval process of § 23-302, Subsection 2, of this chapter.
D. 
Forest management and timber operations are exempted from the rate control, volume control and SWM site plan preparation and submission requirements of this chapter, provided that the forest management and timber operations are performed in accordance with the requirements of 25 Pa. Code Chapter 102.
E. 
Regulated activities involving domestic gardening for single-family consumption shall be exempted from volume control, rate control, and SWM site plan preparation and submission requirements of this chapter, and shall not be subject to the exemption approval process of § 23-302, Subsection 2, of this chapter.
F. 
In-kind repair. In-kind replacement, and maintenance of existing surfaces, and structures shall be exempted from volume control, rate control, and SWM site plan preparation and submission requirements of this chapter and shall not be subject to the exemption approval process of § 23-302, Subsection 2, of this chapter.
2. 
Authorization of exemptions. The Borough shall determine, in accordance with the following requirements and process, whether a proposed regulated activity may be exempted from any of the requirements of this chapter:
A. 
The property owner or developer proposing the regulated activity shall submit, in writing on a form supplied by the Borough, a request for said proposed regulated activity to be exempted from allowable requirements of this chapter pursuant to Subsection 1. The written request shall identify the project and shall indicate the specific exemption criteria, as listed in § 23-302, Subsection 1, that apply to the project.
B. 
Upon receipt of the exemption request form, the Borough Council or its designee shall either approve or deny the exemption request. If the exemption request is denied, the Borough Council or its designee shall direct the property owner or developer to submit the information required to demonstrate that the proposed regulated activity complies with the requirements of this chapter or meets the exemption criteria.
C. 
Exemption request approval shall be at the discretion of the Borough and shall be subject to the following:
(1) 
The Borough may deny any exemption request or suspend or revoke any approved exemption request at any time for any project where the Borough believes that the proposed regulated activity poses a threat to public health, safety, property, or the environment.
(2) 
Approval of an exemption request does not relieve the property owner or developer from other applicable requirements of this chapter or of other Borough ordinances or regulations.
(3) 
The Borough reserves the right to deny an exemption request if a drainage problem is known or identified by the Borough to exist or is expected to exist downstream from the proposed regulated activity.
3. 
Under no circumstance shall the applicant be exempt from implementing such measures as necessary to:
A. 
Meet state water quality standards and requirements.
B. 
Protect health, safety, and property.
C. 
Meet special requirements for high quality (HQ) and exceptional value (EV) watersheds.
4. 
The applicant must demonstrate that the following BMPs are being utilized to the maximum extent practicable to receive consideration for the exemptions:
A. 
Design around and limit disturbance of floodplains, wetlands, natural slopes over 15%, existing native vegetation, and other sensitive and special value features.
B. 
Maintain riparian and forested buffers.
C. 
Limit grading and maintain nonerosive flow conditions in natural flow paths.
D. 
Maintain existing tree canopies near impervious areas.
E. 
Minimize soil disturbance and reclaim disturbed areas with topsoil and vegetation.
F. 
Direct runoff to pervious areas.
5. 
The applicant must demonstrate that the proposed development/additional impervious area will not adversely impact the following:
A. 
Capacities of existing drainageways and storm sewer systems.
B. 
Velocities and erosion.
C. 
Quality of runoff if direct discharge is proposed.
D. 
Existing known problem areas.
E. 
Safe conveyance of the additional runoff.
F. 
Downstream property owners.
[Ord. 441, 7/2/2012]
1. 
Impervious Area.
A. 
The measurement of impervious areas shall include all of the impervious areas in the total proposed development, even if development is to take place in phases.
B. 
For development taking place in phases, the total proposed impervious area within the SWM site plan must be used in determining conformance with this chapter.
C. 
For projects that add impervious area to a parcel, the total impervious area on the parcel is subject to the requirements of this chapter, except that the volume controls in § 23-304 and the peak rate controls of § 23-305 do not need to be retrofitted to existing impervious areas that are not being altered by the proposed regulated activity.
2. 
Normally dry, open-top storage facilities, designed as such, shall completely drain both the volume control and rate control capacities over a period of time not less than 24 hours and not more than 72 hours from the end of the design storm. However, any designed infiltration volume at such facilities is exempt from the minimum twenty-four-hour standard, i.e., may infiltrate in a shorter period of time, so long as none of the stormwater intended for infiltration is discharged into the surface waters of the commonwealth.
3. 
Infiltration BMPs shall be spread out, made as shallow as practicable, and located to maximize use of natural on-site infiltration features while still meeting the other requirements of this chapter.
4. 
If diffused flow is proposed to be concentrated and discharged onto adjacent property, the applicant must document that adequate downstream conveyance facilities exist to safely transport the concentrated discharge or otherwise prove that no erosion, sedimentation, flooding, or other harm will result from the concentrated discharge. The applicant must provide an executed easement for newly concentrated flow across adjacent properties.
5. 
Stormwater drainage systems shall be provided in order to permit unimpeded flow along natural watercourses, except as modified by stormwater management facilities or open channels consistent with this chapter.
6. 
Where watercourses traverse a development site, drainage easements (with a minimum width of 20 feet) shall be provided conforming to the line of such watercourses. The terms of the easement shall prohibit excavation, the placing of fill or structures, and any alterations that may adversely affect the flow of stormwater within any portion of the easement. Also, maintenance, including the mowing of vegetation within the easement, may be required, except as approved by the appropriate governing authority.
7. 
Any stormwater management facilities or any facilities that constitute water obstructions (e.g., culverts, bridges, outfalls, or stream enclosures, etc.) that are regulated by this chapter, that will be located in or adjacent to waters of the commonwealth (including wetlands), shall be subject to approval by PADEP under regulations at 25 Pa. Code Chapter 105 through the joint permit application process or, where deemed appropriate by PADEP, the general permit process.
8. 
Any stormwater management facilities regulated by this chapter that will be located on or discharged onto state highway rights-of-ways shall be subject to approval by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT).
9. 
Stormwater shall not be transferred from one watershed to another, unless:
A. 
The watersheds are subwatersheds of a common watershed which join together within the perimeter of the property;
B. 
The effect of the transfer does not alter the peak rate discharge onto adjacent lands; or
C. 
Easements from the affected landowner(s) are provided.
10. 
Consideration shall be given to the relationship of the subject property to the drainage pattern of the watershed. A concentrated discharge of stormwater to an adjacent property shall be within an existing watercourse or confined in an easement or returned to a pre-development flow type condition.
11. 
No outlet structure from a stormwater management facility, or swale, shall discharge directly onto a Borough or state roadway, unless otherwise approved by the Borough.
12. 
Minimization of impervious surfaces and infiltration of runoff through seepage beds, infiltration trenches, etc., are encouraged, where soil conditions and geology permit, to reduce the size or eliminate the need for detention facilities.
13. 
Easements shall be established for all on-site stormwater management or drainage facilities, including but not limited to detention facilities (above or below the ground), infiltration facilities, all stormwater BMPs, drainage swales, and drainage facilities (inlets, manholes, pipes, etc.).
14. 
Design guidance from the most current version of the Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual, or equivalent resource as precoordinated with the Borough, shall be consulted when choosing design criteria for infiltration/water quality BMPs.
[Ord. 441, 7/2/2012]
1. 
The low-impact development practices provided in the BMP Manual shall be utilized for all regulated activities. Water volume controls shall be implemented using the Design Storm Method in § 23-304, Subsection 1A, or the Simplified Method in § 23-304, Subsection 1B. For regulated activity involving less than one acre of impervious coverage that does not require hydrologic routing to design the stormwater facilities, the applicant may select either methodology on the basis of economic considerations, the intrinsic limitations on applicability of the analytical procedures associated with each methodology, and/or other factors. The Design Storm Method in § 23-304, Subsection 1A, shall be used for all regulated activity involving greater than one acre of impervious coverage.
A. 
The Design Storm Method (CG-1 in the BMP Manual) may be used for any size of regulated activity. This method requires detailed modeling to achieve the following standards:
(1) 
The post-development total runoff volume shall not increase for all storms equal to or less than the two-year, twenty-four-hour-duration precipitation.
(2) 
For modeling purposes:
(a) 
Existing (pre-development), nonforested, pervious areas must be considered meadow.
(b) 
Twenty percent of existing impervious area, when present, shall be considered meadow in the model for existing conditions.
B. 
The Simplified Method (CG-2 in the BMP Manual) is independent of site conditions and may be used for projects involving regulated activities proposing equal to or less than one acre of impervious coverage and that do not require design of stormwater storage facilities. When the Simplified Method is used to address stormwater management needs of new impervious surfaces, the following design standards shall be achieved:
(1) 
Stormwater facilities shall capture at least the first two inches of runoff from all new impervious surfaces.
(2) 
At least the first one inch of runoff from new impervious surfaces shall be permanently removed from the runoff flow and shall not be released into the surface waters of the commonwealth. Removal options for the first one inch of runoff include, but are not necessarily limited to, reuse and infiltration.
(3) 
Infiltration facilities shall be designed to accommodate infiltration of as much of the permanently removed runoff as site conditions will allow. If the soils within the project area do not allow for infiltration of the entire first one inch of runoff from new impervious surfaces, other forms of runoff volume control shall be used to achieve the required removal volume. Such measures may include, but are not limited to, vegetated roofs, biorention, and capture-and-reuse systems. In addition, the Infiltration Alternative authorized in § 23-304, Subsection 1C, may be employed.
(4) 
This method is exempt from the requirements of § 23-305, Rate Controls.
C. 
Infiltration Alternative. Where infiltration is not possible due to soil characteristics or is not desirable given other characteristics, water quality control may be proposed as an alternative to strict adherence to the volume control standards of § 23-304 of this chapter. Where water quality control is proposed, the following standards shall be achieved:
(1) 
At a minimum, the following documentation shall be provided to justify the proposal to reduce the infiltration requirements:
(a) 
Description of and justification for field infiltration/permeability testing with respect to the type of test and test locations.
(b) 
An interpretive narrative describing existing soils of the site and their structure as these relate to the interaction between soils and water characteristics of the site. In addition to providing soil and soil profile descriptions, this narrative shall identify depth to seasonal water tables and depth to bedrock and provide a description of all subsurface elements (restrictive layers, geology, etc.) that influence the direction and rate of subsurface water movement.
(c) 
A qualitative assessment of the site's contribution to annual aquifer recharge shall be made, along with the identification of any restrictions or limitations associated with the use of designed infiltration facilities.
(d) 
The provided documentation must be signed and sealed by a professional engineer or geologist.
(2) 
Water quality BMPs shall be implemented on all permanent stormwater discharges from the proposed project site to achieve pollutant removal efficiencies in accordance with the Table 304.1.
Table 304.1 Required Pollutant Removal Efficiencies for Infiltration Alternatives
Pollutant Load
Units
Required Removal Efficiency
(%)
Total suspended solids (TSS)
Pounds
85%
Total phosphorus (TP)
Pounds
85%
Total nitrate (NO3)
Pounds
50%
(3) 
Design guidance from the most current version of the Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual, or equivalent resource as pre-coordinated with the Borough, shall be consulted when choosing design criteria for water quality BMPs.
[Ord. 441, 7/2/2012]
1. 
Post-development discharge rates shall not exceed the pre-development discharge rates for the one-, two-, five-, ten-, twenty-five-, fifty-, and one-hundred-year, twenty-four-hour storms. If it is shown that the peak rates of discharge indicated by the post-development analysis are less than or equal to the peak rates of discharge indicated by the pre-development analysis for one-, two-, five-, ten-, twenty-five-, fifty-, and one-hundred-year, twenty-four-hour storms, then the requirements of this section have been met. Otherwise, the applicant shall provide additional controls as necessary to satisfy the peak rate of discharge requirement.
2. 
For computation of pre-development peak discharge rates, 20% of existing impervious areas, when present, shall be considered meadow.
[Ord. 441, 7/2/2012]
Where an applicant proposes to utilize riparian buffers as the means to meet the requirements of this chapter, said riparian buffers shall be established and/or maintained in accordance with the BMP Manual or the publication Riparian Forest Buffer Guidance, published November 2010, by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, and as may be amended or updated.
[Ord. 441, 7/2/2012]
1. 
Any drain or conveyance, whether on the surface or subsurface, that allows any nonstormwater discharge including sewage, process wastewater, and wash water to enter the waters of the commonwealth is prohibited.
2. 
No person shall allow, or cause to allow, discharges into surface waters of the commonwealth which are not composed entirely of stormwater, except:
A. 
As provided in Subsection 3 below; and
B. 
Discharges allowed under a state or federal permit.
3. 
The following discharges are authorized unless they are determined to be significant contributors to pollution to the waters of the commonwealth:
A. 
Discharges from firefighting activities.
B. 
Potable water sources, including waterline flushing.
C. 
Irrigation drainage.
D. 
Air-conditioning condensate.
E. 
Springs.
F. 
Water from crawl space pumps.
G. 
Pavement wash waters where spills or leaks of toxic or hazardous materials have not occurred (unless all spill materials have been removed) and where detergents are not used.
H. 
Diverted stream flows.
I. 
Flows from riparian habitats and wetlands.
J. 
Uncontaminated water from foundations or from footing drains.
K. 
Lawn watering.
L. 
Dechlorinated swimming pool discharges.
M. 
Uncontaminated groundwater.
N. 
Water from individual residential car washing.
O. 
Routine external building wash-down (which does not use detergents or other compounds).
P. 
Water discharged in well testing for potable water supplies.
4. 
In the event that the Borough or DEP determines that any of the discharges identified in Subsection 3 significantly contribute to pollution of the waters of the commonwealth, the Borough or DEP will notify the responsible person(s) to cease the discharge.
[Ord. 441, 7/2/2012]
Roof drains, sump pumps, and footer drains should discharge to infiltration or vegetative BMPs unless otherwise approved by the Borough and, to the maximum extent practicable, satisfy the criteria for DIAs. Discharges of each should be conveyed in such a manner as to not cause water problems for adjoining property owners.
[Ord. 441, 7/2/2012]
No person shall modify, remove, fill, landscape, or alter any SWM BMPs, facilities, areas, or structures in any manner, without the written approval of the Borough, with the exception of necessary maintenance activities such as mowing.
[Ord. 441, 7/2/2012]
1. 
Stormwater runoff from all development sites shall be calculated using either the Rational Method or a soil cover complex methodology. Methods shall be selected by the qualified professional based on the individual limitations and suitability of each method for a particular site.
2. 
Peak Flow Rates:
A. 
Rational Method: May be used for drainage areas up to 20 acres. Extreme caution should be used by the qualified professional if the watershed has more than one main drainage channel, if the watershed is divided so that hydrologic properties are significantly different in one versus the other, if the time of concentration exceeds 60 minutes, or if stormwater runoff volume is an important factor.
B. 
Soil Cover Complex Method: May be used for drainage areas greater than 20 acres. This method is recommended for design of stormwater management facilities and where stormwater runoff volume must be taken into consideration.
3. 
Rainfall Values:
A. 
Rational Method: The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Drainage Manual, Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves, Publication 584, Chapter 7A, latest edition, shall be used in conjunction with the appropriate time of concentration and return period.
B. 
Soil Cover Complex Method: The Soil Conservation Service Type II, twenty-four-hour rainfall distribution shall be used in conjunction with rainfall depths from NOAA Atlas 14.
4. 
Time of concentration shall be computed using the NRCS Segmental Method as described in TR-55 (SCS 1986 or most current update). The length of sheet flow shall be limited to 100 feet. The Manning's "n" Roughness Coefficient from TR-55 shall be used for sheet flow. Time of concentration for channel and pipe flow shall be computed using Manning's Equation.
5. 
Runoff Coefficients:[1]
A. 
Rational Method: Use Table C-1.
B. 
Soil Cover Complex Method: Use Table C-2.
[1]
Editor's Note: Tables C-1 and C-2 are on file in the Borough offices.
[Ord. 441, 7/2/2012]
1. 
Any stormwater management facility designed to store runoff and requiring a berm or earthen embankment shall be designed to provide an emergency spillway to handle peak rate of stormwater runoff up to and including the one-hundred-year post-development flow, with a blocked primary outlet structure. The height of embankment must be set as to provide a minimum one foot of freeboard through the spillway, above the maximum water surface elevation, computed when the spillway functions for the one-hundred-year post-development inflow, with a blocked outlet structure. The primary outflow structure must be designed to pass all design storms (up to and including the one-hundred-year event) without discharging through the emergency spillway. The maximum water depth within any stormwater management facility shall be no greater than eight feet when functioning through the primary outlet structure.
2. 
A stormwater management facility berm cross sections must be at least five feet wide at the top and eight feet wide through the emergency spillway. For fill embankments, the side slopes shall be no steeper than 3:1.
3. 
A cutoff and key trench of impervious material shall be provided under all embankments four feet or greater in height.
4. 
Trash racks must be provided to prevent clogging of primary outflow structure stages for all orifices equivalent to 12 inches or smaller in diameter.
5. 
Any stormwater management facility may be required to be fenced with a minimum four-foot-high fence of material acceptable to the Borough. Gates with a minimum opening of 10 feet shall be provided for access.
6. 
Exceptions to these requirements may be made at the discretion of the Borough for BMPs that retain or detain water but are of a much smaller scale than traditional stormwater management facilities.
[Ord. 441, 7/2/2012]
1. 
Storm sewers must be able to convey post-development runoff from a ten-year design storm without surcharging inlets where appropriate. When connecting to an existing storm sewer system, the applicant must demonstrate that the proposed system will not exacerbate any existing stormwater problems and that adequate downstream capacity exists.
2. 
A minimum pipe size of 15 inches in diameter shall be used in all roadway systems (public or private) proposed for construction. Pipes shall be designed to provide a minimum velocity of 2 1/2 feet per second when flowing full, but in all cases, the slope shall be no less than 1/2%. Arch pipe of equivalent cross-sectional area may be substituted in lieu of circular pipe where cover or utility conflict conditions exist.
3. 
Inlets, manholes, pipes, and culverts shall be constructed in accordance with the specifications set forth in PennDOT's Publication 408, latest edition, and as detailed in the PennDOT Publication 72M, Standards for Roadway Construction (RC), latest edition, or as approved by the Borough Engineer. All material and construction details (inlets, manholes, pipe trenches, etc.) must be shown on the SWM site plan, and a note added that all construction must be in accordance with PennDOT's Publication 408 and PennDOT's Publication 72M, latest editions.
4. 
Accessible drainage structures shall be located on continuous storm sewer system at all vertical dislocations, at all locations where a transition in storm sewer pipe sizing is required, at all vertical and horizontal angle points exceeding five degrees and at all points of convergence of two or more storm sewer pipes.
5. 
All storm drainage piping discharging to the ground surface shall be provided with either reinforced concrete headwalls and end sections or plastic and metal end sections compatible with the pipe size involved in accordance with PennDOT Publication 408 and Publication 72M.
6. 
Outlet protection shall be provided at all surface discharge points with storm drainage piping.
7. 
Swales must be able to convey post-development runoff from a ten-year design storm with six inches of freeboard to top of the swale.
8. 
Swales shall have side slopes no steeper than 3:1.