A.
Whereas, the Village Board has the power, pursuant to Wis. Stats. § 61.34, to enact legislation promoting the health, safety, and welfare of the public.
B.
Whereas, the Village Board has reviewed the holdings and findings of the following court cases: McKune v. Lile, 122 S. Ct. 2017 (2002); Smith v. Doe, 123 S. Ct. 1140 (2003); Doe v. Miller, 405 F.3d 700 (8th Cir. 2005); Vill. of Menomonee Falls v. Ferguson, 334 Wis. 2d 131 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011); City of S. Milwaukee v. Kester, 347 Wis. 2d 334 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013); Hoffman v. Vill. of Pleasant Prairie, 249 F. Supp. 3d 951 (E.D. Wis. 2017); Evenstad v. City of West St. Paul, 306 F. Supp. 3d 1086 (D. Minn. 2018); Vasquez v. Foxx, 895 F.3d 515 (7th Cir. 2018); and Werner v. City of Green Bay, 743 Fed. Appx. 10 (7th Cir. 2018).
C.
Whereas, based upon a 2003 study by the United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, titled Recidivism of Sex Offenders Released from Prison in 1994, sex offenders released from prison were four times more likely to be rearrested for a sex crime as compared to non-sex offenders released from prison. Of those individuals included in the study, 40% of new sex crimes committed by those sex offenders released from prison had occurred within the first 12 months of release. Further, child molesters who were released from prison were at least six times more likely to be rearrested for another sex crime against a child as compared to a non-sex offender released from prison. Based upon a 2019 study by the United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, titled Recidivism of Sex Offenders Released from State Prison: A Nine-Year Follow-Up (2005-14), released sex offenders were more than three times as likely as other released prisoners to be arrested for rape or sexual assault, and released sex offenders accounted for 5% of releases in 2005 and 16% of arrests for rape or sexual assault during the nine-year follow-up period.
D.
Whereas, the Village Board has conducted a review of other reports and studies related to creating and implementing specific desistance factors to reduce recidivism of sex offenders. The studies and reports that have been reviewed include the following: Recidivism After Release from Prison, State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Tatar, J. & Jones, M. (August 2016); Examining the Effects of Residential Situations and Residential Mobility on Offender Recidivism, Crime and Delinquency 61(3), 375-401, Steiner, B., Makarios, M.D., & Travis, L. F. (2015); Examining Sexual Offenses through a Sociological Lens: A Socio-Cultural Exploration of Causal and Desistance Theories, European Journal of Probation, 8(3), 170-184, Kyle, D. (2016); Criminal Careers in the Short-Term: Intra-Individual Variability in Crime and Its Relation to Local Life Circumstances, American Sociological Review, 60(5), 655-673, Horney, J., Osgood, W., & Marshall I.H., (1995); and An Exploration of Protective Factors Supporting Desistance from Sexual Offending, Sexual Abuse: A journal of Research and Treatment, 27(1), 16-33, Mann, R.E., de Vries Robbe, M., Maruna, S., & Thornton, D. (2015).
E.
Whereas, the Village Board acknowledges that literature on sex offender recidivism, sex offender desistance, and sex offender residency restrictions contains studies which report varying effectiveness of certain strategies. The Village Board intends to use these strategies and studies to best create a regulatory framework which protects the children of the Village of Hales Corners (hereinafter "Village"), yet allows for a constructive and safe assimilation of designated sex offenders into the community.
F.
The Village Board finds that the risk of recidivism decreases over time from the date of the last conviction, especially in circumstances where offenders have community connections, goals, and employment. The Village Board is also aware that absent a domicile clause, the Village would have open doors for nonresident sex offender residency when other communities have closed doors, inviting a substantial increase in child sex offender placements, thereby increasing potential negative impacts on the health, safety, welfare, and additional cost to the Village and its residents. Studies show increased recidivism rates for offenders who frequently move or do not have established community networks. These studies support maintaining a domicile clause thereby limiting designated offenders with no ties to the community and increasing the likelihood that a designated offender implements appropriate and existing community support while allowing the community to remain intelligently attentive, aware, and provide adequate and appropriate intervention if needed.
G.
Accordingly, the Village Board has created this regulatory measure designed to protect the health and safety of the children in the Village against the threat posed by certain designated sex offenders. Sex offenders who prey on children represent a substantial danger to victims, target a particularly vulnerable group within the community who are less able to articulate or report abuse, and create a significant impact on law enforcement time and community resources to investigate abuses and mitigate risks. This article is also intended to demonstrate the Village's resolute goal of protecting children in areas of potential vulnerability and impart the community's necessary expectation that designated sex offenders released into the community must maintain the community's confidence by demonstrating safe, productive, and law-abiding behavior while residing within the Village. It is the intent of the Village Board that this regulatory scheme is civil and nonpunitive in order to serve the Village's compelling interest to promote, protect, and improve the health, safety and welfare of all citizens of the Village.