The purpose of this Part is to list and describe the powers,
procedures, composition, and standards for the Zoning Hearing Board,
as required by the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Act
247, as amended.
The Board shall conduct hearings and make decisions in accordance
with the provisions of Section 908 of the MPC.
Decision of the Board shall include the following elements:
1. Findings of fact, including a brief summary of relevant testimony
and information entered during the proceedings of the Board.
2. Citation by quotation or by reference to the specific sections of
the local ordinances and/or the MPC relevant to the case in question.
3. Conclusions of the Board, enumerating the reasons why such conclusions
are deemed appropriate in light of the facts found.
4. Ruling of the Board, indicating in writing any stipulations or conditions
attached to the ruling.
In any instance where the Zoning Hearing Board is required to
consider a variance or special exception, the Board shall, among other
things, consider the following standards:
1. MPC Criteria for Variances.
A. The Board shall hear requests for variances where it is alleged that
the provisions of this chapter inflict unnecessary hardship on the
applicant.
B. A variance from the terms of this chapter shall not be granted by
the Board unless and until a written application for a variance is
submitted by the applicant, who shall have the burden of establishing
the presence of all of the following conditions where relevant in
a given case:
(1)
That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or
shape or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar
to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due
to such conditions and not to the circumstances or conditions generally
created by the provisions of this chapter in the neighborhood or district
in which the property is located.
(2)
That, because of such physical circumstances or conditions,
there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of this chapter and that the authorization
of the variance is, therefore, necessary to enable the reasonable
use of the property.
(3)
That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the applicant.
(4)
That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is
located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use
or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public
welfare.
(5)
That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification
possible of the property.
C. In granting any variance, the Board may attach such reasonable conditions
and safeguards as it may deem necessary to implement the purposes
of the MPC and this chapter.
2. Standards for Review of Special Exceptions.
A. In any instance where the Board is required to consider a request
for a special exception, the Board shall consider the following factors
where appropriate:
(1)
That the proposed use is appropriate for the site in question
in terms of size, topography, natural features, drainage, sewage disposal,
water supply, accessibility, and availability of public services and
that adequate provisions will be made to protect sensitive environmental
features such as streams, lakes, wetlands, slopes, and mature trees.
(2)
That the proposed use is compatible with the character of the
surrounding neighborhood and will not interfere with or detract from
legitimate uses and adjacent properties and that adequate measures
will be provided through building design, site layout, landscaping,
planting, and operational controls to minimize any adverse impacts
caused by noise, lights, glare, odors, smoke, fumes, traffic, parking,
loading, and signage.
(3)
That the proposed special exception will serve the best interest
of the Borough, convenience of the community, and the public health,
safety, and welfare.
(4)
That the proposed use is consistent with the most recently adopted
Lansdowne and East Lansdowne Joint Comprehensive Plan.
(5)
That the proposed use promotes orderly development, proper population
density, and the provision of adequate community facilities and services,
including police and fire protection.
(6)
That the proposed use is suitable in terms of its effect on
highway safety and traffic circulation and that access, on-site circulation,
and parking are adequate in view of anticipated traffic.
(7)
That the proposed use will provide for adequate off-street parking,
as required in Part 8.
B. In cases where uses permitted by special exception are not accompanied by specific standards for such uses, the regulations in §
27-502 shall apply.
C. Financial hardship shall not be construed as a basis for granting
special exceptions.
D. In granting any special exception, the Board may attach reasonable conditions and safeguards in addition to those expressed in this chapter as it may deem necessary to implement the purposes of the MPC and this chapter, which conditions and safeguards may relate to, but not be limited to, screening, lighting, noise, safety, aesthetics, and the minimization of noxious, offensive, or hazardous elements. Such special exceptions shall be clearly authorized by a provision in this chapter and shall, where applicable, comply with the more-specific standards relating to such special exceptions contained in appropriate sections of Part
5.
Unless otherwise specified by the Board, a variance or special
exception shall expire if the applicant fails to obtain a building
permit within six months from the date of authorization thereof.
See Sections 914.1 and 915.1 of the MPC.
See Article X-a of the MPC.