"(Township official or Township Engineer) on this date (Signature
date), has reviewed and hereby certifies that the SWM Site Plan meets
all design standards and criteria of the Township Ordinance No. (number
assigned to ordinance), except where waivers have been granted as
noted on the Plan. The review is based on a survey and plan prepared
by others and assumes that all information is correct and valid as
submitted."
|
Return Period
(years)
|
24-Hour Storm
(inches)
|
---|---|
1
|
2.00
|
2
|
2.35
|
5
|
2.88
|
10
|
3.30
|
25
|
3.91
|
50
|
4.40
|
100
|
4.92
|
The precipitation values for each frequency storm listed above
were abstracted from the precipitation frequency estimates developed
by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration as set forth
in NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2 (NOAA June 2004). The NOAA data are available
from the Hydrometeorological Design Studies Center of the National
Weather Service.
| |
The NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2 report can be accessed from the
NOAA website at http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/.
|
Ground Cover
|
Hydrologic Soil Group Curve Numbers
| |||
---|---|---|---|---|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
| |
Woodland
|
30
|
55
|
70
|
77
|
Meadow
|
30
|
58
|
71
|
78
|
Grass
|
39
|
61
|
74
|
80
|
Table 23-1
| ||
---|---|---|
Acceptable Computation Methodologies for Stormwater Management
Plans
| ||
Method
|
Source
|
Applicability
|
TR-20 or commercial package based on TR-20
|
USDA — NRCS
|
When use of full model is desirable or necessary
|
TR-55 or commercial package based on TR-55
|
USDA — NRCS
|
Applicable for plans within the model's limitations
|
HEC - HMS
|
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
|
When full model is desirable or necessary
|
PSRM
|
Penn State University
|
When full model is desirable or necessary
|
VT/PSUHM
|
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Penn State University
|
When full model is desirable or necessary
|
Modified Rational Method or commercial package based on this
method
|
Emil Kuiching (1889)
|
For sites less than 20 acres
|
SWMM or commercial package based on SWMM
|
U.S. EPA
|
Most applicable in urban areas
|
Small Storm Hydrology Method (as included in SLAMM)
|
PV and Associates, or the website www.winslamm.com
|
Calculation of runoff volume from urban and suburban areas
|
Q
|
=
|
Peak flow rate, cubic feet per second (cfs)
|
C
|
=
|
Runoff coefficient, dependent on land use/cover
|
I
|
=
|
Design rainfall intensity, inches per hour
|
A
|
=
|
Drainage area, acres
|
The WQv is based on the following equation:
|
WQv = [(P)(Rv)(A)]/12 (acre-feet)
|
Where:
| ||
P
|
=
|
Rainfall depth in inches (set to one inch)
|
Rv
|
=
|
Volumetric runoff coefficient, 0.05 + 0.009(I) where I is percent
impervious cover
|
A
|
=
|
Site area (acres)
|
Recharge Volume (Rev), (acre-feet)
|
Fraction of WQv, depending on soil hydrologic group.
|
Rev = (S)(Ai)
|
Where:
| ||
S
|
=
|
Soil-specific recharge factor in inches
|
Ai
|
=
|
The measured impervious cover
|
Hydrologic Soil Group
|
Soil Specific Recharge Factor (S)
|
A
|
0.40 inch
|
B
|
0.25 inch of runoff
|
C
|
0.10 inch of runoff
|
D
|
0.05 inch of runoff
|
Volume Reduction Method # 1: Natural Area Conservation.
|
A water quality volume reduction can be taken when undisturbed
natural areas are conserved on a site, thereby retaining their pre-development
hydrologic and water quality characteristics. Under this method, a
designer would be able to subtract the conservation areas from the
total site area when computing the water quality protection volume.
An added benefit is that the post-development peak discharges will
be smaller, and hence, water quantity control volumes will be reduced
due to lower post-development curve numbers or rational formula "C"
values.
|
Rule: Subtract conservation areas from total site area when
computing water quality protection volume requirements.
|
Criteria:
|
• Conservation area cannot be disturbed during
project construction and must be protected from sediment deposition.
The conservation area shall be protected with a safety fence until
construction has been completed. After construction the area shall
be posted with signage indicating that it is a conservation area.
|
• Shall be protected by limits of disturbance
clearly shown on all construction drawings.
|
• Shall be located within an acceptable conservation
easement instrument that ensures perpetual protection of the proposed
area. The easement must clearly specify how the natural area vegetation
shall be managed, and boundaries will be marked. [Note: managed turf
(e.g., playgrounds, regularly maintained open areas) is not an acceptable
form of vegetation management.]
|
• Shall have a minimum contiguous area requirement
of 10,000 square feet.
|
• Rv is kept constant when calculating WQv.
|
• Must be forested or have a stable, natural
ground cover.
|
Volume Reduction Method #2: Stream Buffers.
|
This reduction can be taken when a stream buffer effectively
treats stormwater runoff. Effective treatment constitutes treating
runoff through overland flow in a naturally vegetated or forested
buffer. Under the proposed method, a designer would be able to subtract
areas draining via overland flow to the buffer from total site area
when computing water quality protection volume requirements. The design
of the stream buffer treatment system must use appropriate methods
for conveying flows above the annual recurrence (one-year storm) event.
|
Rule: Subtract areas draining via overland flow to the buffer
from total site area when computing water quality protection volume
requirements.
|
Criteria:
|
• The minimum undisturbed buffer width shall
be 50 feet from top of bank.
|
• The maximum contributing length shall be
150 feet for pervious surfaces and 75 feet for impervious surfaces.
|
• The average contributing slope shall be 3%
maximum unless a flow spreader is used. In no case shall the average
contributing slope be greater than 10%.
|
• Runoff shall enter the buffer as overland
sheet flow. A flow spreader can be installed to ensure this.
|
• Buffers shall remain as naturally vegetated
or forested areas and will require only routine debris removal or
erosion repairs.
|
• Rv is kept constant when calculating WQv.
|
• Not applicable if overland flow filtration/groundwater
recharge reduction is already being taken.
|
Volume Reduction Method #3: Enhanced Swales.
|
This reduction may be taken when enhanced swales are used for
water quality protection. Under the proposed method, a designer would
be able to subtract the areas draining to an enhanced swale from total
site area when computing water quality protection volume requirements.
An enhanced swale can fully meet the water quality protection volume
requirements for certain kinds of low-density residential development
(see Volume Reduction Method #5). An added benefit is the post-development
peak discharges will likely be lower due to a longer time of concentration
for the site.
|
Rule: Subtract the areas draining to an enhanced swale from
total site area when computing water quality protection volume requirements.
|
Criteria:
|
• This method is typically only applicable
to moderate- or low-density residential land uses (three dwelling
units per acre maximum).
|
• The maximum flow velocity for water quality
design storm shall be less than or equal to 1.0 foot per second.
|
• The minimum residence time for the water
quality storm shall be five minutes.
|
• The bottom width shall be a maximum of six
feet. If a larger channel is needed, use of a compound cross-section
is required.
|
• The side slopes shall be 3:1 (horizontal:
vertical) or flatter.
|
• The channel slope shall be 3% or less.
|
• Rv is kept constant when calculating WQv.
|
Volume Reduction Method # 4: Overland Flow Filtration/Groundwater
Recharge Zones.
|
This reduction can be taken when overland flow filtration/infiltration
zones are incorporated into the site design to receive runoff from
rooftops or other small impervious areas (e.g., driveways, small parking
lots, etc.). This can be achieved by grading the site to promote overland
vegetative filtering or by providing infiltration or rain garden areas.
If impervious areas are adequately disconnected, they can be deducted
from total site area when computing the water quality protection volume
requirements. An added benefit will be that the post-development peak
discharges will likely be lower due to a longer time of concentration
for the site.
|
Rule: If impervious areas are adequately disconnected, they
can be deducted from total site area when computing the water quality
protection volume requirements.
|
Criteria:
|
• Relatively permeable soils (hydrologic soil
groups A and B) should be present.
|
• Runoff shall not come from a designated hot
spot.
|
• The maximum contributing impervious flow
path length shall be 75 feet.
|
• Downspouts shall be at least 10 feet away
from the nearest impervious surface to discourage reconnections.
|
• The disconnection shall drain continuously
through a vegetated channel, swale, or filter strip to the property
line or structural stormwater control.
|
• The length of the disconnection shall be
equal to or greater than the contributing length.
|
• The entire vegetative disconnection shall
be on a slope less than or equal to 3%.
|
• The surface impervious area tributary to
any one discharge location shall not exceed 5,000 square feet.
|
• For those areas draining directly to a buffer,
reduction can be obtained from either overland flow filtration or
stream buffers (See Method #2).
|
• Rv is kept constant when calculating WQv.
|
Volume Reduction Method #5: Environmentally Sensitive Large
Lot Subdivisions.
|
This reduction can be taken when a group of environmental site
design techniques are applied to low- and very-low-density residential
development [e.g., one dwelling unit per two acres (du/ac) or lower].
The use of this method can eliminate the need for structural stormwater
controls to treat water quality protection volume requirements. This
method is targeted towards large lot subdivisions and will likely
have limited application.
|
Rule: Targeted towards large lot subdivisions (e.g., two-acre
lots and greater). The requirement for structural facilities to treat
the water quality protection volume may be waived.
|
Criteria:
|
For single lot development:
|
• Total site impervious cover is less than
15%.
|
• Lot size shall be at least two acres.
|
• Rooftop runoff is disconnected in accordance
with the criteria in Method #4.
|
• Grass channels are used to convey runoff
versus curb and gutter. For multiple lots:
|
• Total impervious cover footprint shall be
less than 15% of the area.
|
• Lot areas should be at least two acres, unless
clustering is implemented. Open space developments should have a minimum
of 25% of the site protected as natural conservation areas and shall
be at least a half-acre average individual lot size.
|
• Grass channels should be used to convey runoff
versus curb and gutter (see Method #3).
|
• Overland flow filtration/infiltration zones
should be established (see Method #4).
|
Soil evaluations shall be performed to determine the feasibility
and extent to which infiltration systems can be used. The evaluation
shall be performed by a qualified, licensed geologist, geotechnical/civil
engineer or soil scientist and, at a minimum, address soil types,
soil permeability, depth to bedrock, limitations of soils, presence/absence
of carbonate geology susceptibility to subsidence and/or sinkhole
formation and subgrade stability. The testing and evaluation should
be completed at the preliminary design stage.
|
Infiltration requirements shall be based on the portions of
the site that are permeable prior to disturbance and the degree to
which development will reduce the permeability of the site. Permeability
of the site shall be determined based on the detailed evaluations
described herein. Use of stormwater management facilities to retain
stormwater for infiltration should be applied to all areas where the
soils evaluation indicates favorable conditions. Areas generally not
favorable for infiltration shall still be provided with an appropriate
water quality practice.
|
Soil infiltration tests shall be performed to an equivalent
depth or elevation of the bottom of the proposed infiltration areas.
These tests shall follow the procedures of percolation test holes
as established by the Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) for
on-lot septic systems. The testing shall include a test pit and percolation
test holes. The test hole shall be excavated to a depth so that the
presence or absence of bedrock and/or seasonal high water table can
be determined. A soil log describing the soils present in each test
pit shall be performed. All test holes used for evaluating the percolation
rate shall be pre-soaked in accordance with the procedures established
by the ACHD. The location and number of test pits and percolation
holes shall be determined based on the type(s) of stormwater management
facilities being designed. Acceptability of infiltration rates shall
be based on sound engineering judgment and recommended design considerations
described in the design manuals listed in the references or other
source material acceptable to the Township Engineer.
|
"Under and subject, nevertheless, to the following conditions
and restrictions: Prior to any Earth Disturbance for which stormwater
management facilities are required by the Township, Grantee shall
construct the permanent stormwater management facilities as shown
on the stormwater management plan (the "Plan") prepared by <NAME>,
P.E., dated <DATE> and last revised <DATE> and approved by Township;
thereafter, the Grantee, his heirs, executors, administrators, successors
and assigns ("Owner"), at his sole cost and expense, shall operate,
maintain and repair said stormwater management facilities on the lot
in accordance with said plan, so that the facilities shall at all
times continue to operate and function in the same manner and capacity
as they were designed. In the event of the failure of the owner to
comply with these conditions and restrictions, Township shall have
said stormwater management facilities repaired or restored as required,
and the costs thereof plus a reasonable allowance for overhead shall
be assessed to the owner; said assessment shall be a charge and a
continuing lien upon the property herein. The Township, before it
may exercise this right, shall notify the owner by certified mail
of its intention to take the aforesaid action. The notice shall set
forth in what manner the owner has neglected the operation and maintenance
of or repair to the stormwater management facilities, and if the owner
fails, within a period of 90 calendar days, to correct or repair the
items listed in the notice from the Township, then and only then,
may the Township exercise this right."
|