Editor's Note: This chapter shall be considered to
be an amendment to the Land Development Regulations.
[Ord. No. 801 § 1; Ord. No. 2013-02 § 28-1]
This chapter shall be known, and may be cited as the "Environmental
Assessment Regulations of the Borough of Haworth."
[Ord. No. 801 § 2; Ord. No. 2013-02 § 28-2]
[Ord. No. 801 § 3; Ord. No. 28-2 § 3; Ord. No. 2013-02 § 28-3]
The purpose of this chapter is to (a) minimize adverse impacts
on the environment; (b) permit the Construction Official and/or the
Approving Agency to assess the effect of proposed development and/or
site disturbances upon the environment, and (c) explore reasonable
mitigation measures and/or development alternatives that might have
the effect of lessening adverse impacts. Particular emphasis is made
upon assessing the effect of the proposed development upon surface
waters, groundwater, air resources, pollution of all kinds, drainage,
water disposal, wetlands, flood plains, and critical environmental
areas.
[Ord. No. 801 § 4; Ord. No. 2013-02 § 28-4]
a.
Non-Applicability. Applications for a building permit to do interior
work only, not necessitating a variance or site plan approval, shall
not require the completion of an Environmental Checklist or an Initial
Environmental Assessment Report.
b.
Environmental Checklist. The Environmental Checklist Schedule II shall be completed by the Construction Official as part of his review of every application to construct or enlarge any structure, or to cause any site disturbance, for which neither subdivision approval, site plan approval, nor variance approval is required under Chapter 26, Land Use Regulations. The Environmental Checklist shall be designed to determine whether or not the following environmental features are affected by the proposed development: wetlands, flood plains, stream encroachment areas, steep slopes, surface waters, hydric soils, and NJDEP designated C-1 anti-degradation areas.
c.
Initial Environmental Assessment Report (Schedule I).[1]All development applications to the Haworth Planning Board
or Haworth Zoning Board of Adjustment shall include a completed Initial
Environmental Assessment Report, designed to determine the effect
upon the environment of the proposed development.
[1]
Editor's Note: The Initial Environmental Assessment Report (Schedule I) is included as an attachment to this chapter.
[Ord. No. 801 § 5; Ord. No. 2013-02 § 28-5]
a.
With respect to applications to construct or enlarge any structure,
or to cause any site disturbance, for which neither subdivision approval,
site plan approval, nor variance approval is required under the Haworth
Land Use Ordinance, no building permit shall be issued until the Haworth
Construction Official shall have completed an Environmental Checklist.
b.
In the event the Haworth Construction Official shall determine that
none of the environmental conditions identified on the Environmental
Checklist are affected or potentially affected by the proposed development
or disturbance, the building permit shall be issued provided all other
conditions for issuance of a building permit have been satisfied.
c.
In the event that the Haworth Construction Official shall determine
that one or more of the environmental conditions identified in the
Environmental Checklist is affected or potentially affected by the
proposed development, the Haworth Construction Official shall deny
the application for a building permit, advising the applicant in writing
of the need to secure any required approval or waiver for the proposed
development. No building permit shall thereafter be issued with respect
to the proposed development until the applicant shall provide such
approval or waiver.
d.
In making the determination as to whether or not the environmental
conditions identified on the Environmental Checklist are affected
or potentially affected by the proposed development, the Construction
Official shall refer to the maps included in the Haworth Master Plan
of 1991, and as may hereafter be amended from time to time, the Periodic
Reexaminations of 1997, 2003, 2009 and beyond, the Environmental Resource
Inventory of 1991 and 1992 and any subsequent amendments, and the
Land Use and Conservation Plan Elements of 2006. If the Construction
Official deems it necessary, he shall conduct a site inspection.
[Ord. No. 801 § 6; Ord. No. 2013-02 § 28-6]
a.
The purposes of the Initial Environmental Assessment Report are to
require that applicants provide full disclosure of potential adverse
impacts that might be generated by their proposed developments, and
that they identify reasonable alternatives that might serve to lessen
any of those anticipated adverse impacts.
b.
The Approving Agency may, at the request of the applicant, waive, in whole or in part, the requirement of submission of an Initial Environmental Assessment Report provided the Board determines that the waiver will not impair the public health, safety or general welfare, and is not inconsistent with the purposes of zoning set forth in Section 26-201 of Chapter 26 Land Use Regulations, and/or in the Haworth Master Plan.
c.
In the event that a professional consultant is deemed necessary by
the Approving Agency to review the Initial Environmental Assessment
Report, the Approving Agency may, in its discretion, hire a consultant,
the cost of which shall be paid by the applicant in advance.
d.
In the event the Approving Agency finds that the information provided
by the applicant in the Initial Environmental Assessment Report is
insufficient for the Approving Agency to evaluate the potential environmental
impacts of a project, the Approving Agency may require the applicant
to have a qualified professional (i.e. engineer, planner, landscape
architect, and/or environmental consultant) complete a new signed
Initial Environmental Assessment Report.
e.
In the event the Approving Agency finds that the information provided
by the applicant in the professionally completed Initial Environmental
Assessment Report is insufficient for the Approving Agency to evaluate
the potential environmental impacts of a project, the Approving Agency
may require the applicant to prepare and submit a professionally signed
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) by a qualified professional (i.e.
engineer, planner, landscape architect, and/or environmental consultant).
[Ord. No. 801 § 7; Ord. No. 2013-02 § 28-7]
This chapter will amend Chapter 26, the Haworth Land Use Regulations, Ord. No. 779, and will require that the Initial Environmental Assessment Report be included in the checklist of items that must be submitted with each application to the Approving Agency, except as herein provided.
[Ord. No. 801 § 8; Ord. No. 2013-02 § 28-8]
All ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with or in
conflict with this chapter are hereby repealed as to the inconsistencies
or conflict.
[Ord. No. 801; Ord. No. 2013-02 § 28-9]
If any section, part of any section, or clause or phrase of
this chapter is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid,
such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this chapter.
[Ord. No. 2013-02]
a.
An EIS must assemble relevant and material facts upon which an Approving
Agency's decision is to be made. It must analyze the significant
adverse impacts and evaluate all reasonable alternatives. EISs must
be analytical and not encyclopedic. The applicant may review applicable
municipal files and request copies of information that the applicant
deems relevant to the EIS. The Approving Agency and other municipal
employees must cooperate with applicants preparing EISs by making
these copies available to them at fees conforming to municipal ordinances.
When requested, municipal consultants must also cooperate with applicants
but need not make their files available for inspection.
b.
EISs must be clearly and concisely written in plain language that
can be read and understood by the public. EISs should address only
those potential significant adverse environmental impacts that can
be reasonably anticipated and/or have been identified in the scoping
process (see paragraph c below). EISs should not contain more detail
than is appropriate considering the nature and magnitude of the proposed
action and the significance of its potential impacts. Highly technical
material should be summarized and, if it must be included in its entirety,
should be referenced in the statement and included in an appendix.
c.
The Approving Agency should conduct a scoping session with the applicants
once the Approving Agency has determined that the adverse impacts
projected could reasonably be significant (see paragraph g below).
The term "scoping session" refers to a discussion between the applicant
and the Approving Agency during which they jointly decide which of
the subject matters in paragraph g below should be included in the
EIS. In the event of a disagreement, the Approving Agency's decision
shall be final. Scoping sessions shall be conducted at public meetings,
and public input should be considered by the Approving Agency.
d.
All EISs must be preceded by a cover sheet stating the name or descriptive
title of the action, its location, the names of individuals or organizations
that prepared any portion of the EIS, the preparation date, and the
date by which comments must be submitted.
e.
An EIS must have a table of contents following the cover sheet and
a precise summary that adequately and accurately summarizes the statement.
f.
The format of the EIS may be flexible; however, all EISs must include
the following elements:
1.
A concise description of the proposed action, its purpose, public
need and benefits;
2.
A concise description of the environmental setting of the areas to
be affected, sufficient to understand the impacts of the proposed
action and alternatives;
3.
A statement and evaluation of the potential significant adverse environmental
impacts at a level of detail that reflects the severity of the impacts
and the reasonable likelihood of their occurrence. The EIS should
identify and discuss the following only where applicable and significant:
(a)
Reasonably related short-term and long-term impacts, cumulative
impacts and other associated environmental impacts;
(b)
Those adverse environmental impacts that cannot be avoided or
adequately mitigated if the proposed action is implemented;
(c)
Any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of environmental
resources that would be associated with the proposed action should
it be implemented;
(d)
Any growth-inducing aspects of the proposed action;
(e)
Impacts of the proposed action on the use and conservation of
energy; and
(f)
Impacts of the proposed action on solid waste management and
its consistency with the State or locally adopted solid waste management
plan.
4.
A description of the mitigation measures;
5.
A description and evaluation of the range of reasonable alternatives
to the action that are feasible, considering the objectives and capabilities
of the applicants. The description and evaluation of each alternative
should be at a level of detail sufficient to permit a comparative
assessment of the alternatives discussed. The range of alternatives
must include the no action alternative. The no action alternative
discussion should evaluate the adverse or beneficial site changes
that are likely to occur in the reasonably foreseeable future, in
the absence of the proposed action. The range of alternatives may
also include, as appropriate, alternative:
6.
A list of any underlying studies, reports, EISs and other information
obtained and considered in preparing the statement including the final
written scope.
g.
The range of subject matters that should be considered during the
scoping session should include but not be limited to the following,
however only those subjects that the Approving Agency could reasonably
expect to experience adverse impacts should be included in the EIS:
1.
Design and layout;
2.
Construction and operation;
3.
List of required approvals;
4.
Geology;
5.
Soils;
6.
Topography;
7.
Groundwater;
8.
Surface waters;
9.
Air quality;
10.
Vegetation;
11.
Fauna;
12.
Wetlands;
13.
Roadways and traffic;
14.
Public transportation;
15.
Pedestrian environment;
16.
Existing and surrounding land uses;
17.
Existing and surrounding zoning;
18.
Land use plans (local, regional, County, State);
19.
Community services (schools, police, fire, ambulance, social services,
recreation, utilities, public water supply, solid waste disposal,
sewage treatment);
20.
Demography;
21.
Visual resources;
22.
Historic and archaeological resources; and
23.
Noise.