[Amended 10-22-2018 STM by Art. 6; 10-28-2019 STM by Art. 4; 10-27-2025 STM by Art. 4]
10.1.1
Purpose.
A.
The primary purpose of this § 320-10.1 is to preserve the open space resources of the Town of Ayer. This is necessary for the protection of the Town's water resources and other unique environmental assets. This § 320-10.1 is also intended to foster compact development patterns using flexible regulations for density and lot dimensions and to promote and encourage creativity in neighborhood design.
B.
The Town encourages the use of open space residential development (OSRD) because it results in the preservation of contiguous open space and important environmental resources, while allowing design flexibility. OSRD reduces development impacts on farmland, forests, wildlife habitats, large tracts of contiguous open space, environmentally sensitive areas, steep slopes, hilltops, and historically significant areas.
C.
To encourage this type of development, OSRD is allowed by right, subject only to this section, applicable provisions of the Ayer Zoning Bylaw, and the requirements of the Planning Board's Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land. An OSRD that does not require approval as a subdivision is allowed by right subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board. In order to encourage small subdivisions to follow OSRD principles, there is no minimum parcel size or number of lots required for an OSRD.
10.1.2
Applicability.
A.
An OSRD may be proposed in any residential district. All subdivisions shall comply with the OSRD provisions of this section unless the Planning Board allows a development that deviates from the requirements of said section by special permit. Such deviations may be approved if the applicant demonstrates that the proposed alternative development configuration provides adequate protection of the site's environmental resources and fulfills the purposes of this § 320-10.1 as well as or better than an OSRD.
B.
Subsection A above applies only to subdivisions of land as defined in MGL c. 41, § 81L, and not to construction of homes or businesses on individual lots that existed prior to September 5, 2017, or to lots created through the "Approval Not Required" process with frontage on public ways existing as such as of September 5, 2017, described in the Regulations for the Subdivision of Land (the "Subdivision Regulations").[1] However, if subdivision approval is not required because a new roadway is not proposed, an applicant may nevertheless apply for OSRD approval under this section. In such case, the application shall be subject to site plan review as described in § 320-3.5. If the proposed OSRD also involves one or more common driveways, density bonuses, transfer of development rights, or any other use that requires a special permit, the proceedings for all such special permits and the site plan review for the lot configuration shall occur in one consolidated special permit proceeding before the Planning Board.
10.1.3
Development impact statement and conservation analysis.
A.
In order to enable the Planning Board to determine whether or not a proposed OSRD (or development by special permit that deviates from the requirements for OSRD) satisfies the purposes and standards of this § 320-10.1, an applicant must present sufficient information on the environmental and open space resources for the Board to make such determination. The required information shall be provided in the form of a development impact statement as described in the Subdivision Regulations, including a conservation analysis. In the case of an OSRD that is not a subdivision, and that is presented as a site plan review application, the applicant shall not be required to submit a full development impact statement. However, the Planning Board may require the submission of all or part of a conservation analysis as described in the Board's rules and regulations.
B.
Conservation analysis and findings.
(1)
Prior to filing an application, the applicant is encouraged to meet with the Planning Board to discuss the conservation resources on the site. At such meeting, the Planning Board shall indicate to the applicant which land is likely to have the most conservation value and be most important to preserve and where development may be most appropriately located.
(2)
In the case of a proposed plan that deviates from the requirements of this § 320-10.1, if the Planning Board determines that the land with the greatest conservation value cannot be protected except by the use of an OSRD plan, the Planning Board shall deny the special permit for the deviation and require that the applicant submit a plan that complies with the requirements for an OSRD.
(3)
The Planning Board, in consultation with the Conservation Commission, shall study the conservation analysis, may conduct field visits, and shall formally determine which land should be preserved and where development may be located. The Planning Board shall make written findings supporting this determination (the "conservation findings"). The Planning Board shall deny any application that does not include sufficient information to make conservation findings or that does not preserve land that the Planning Board determines should be preserved from development as a result of the conservation analysis and findings.
(4)
The Planning Board's conservation findings shall be incorporated into its decision to approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application. The conservation findings shall show land to be permanently preserved by a conservation restriction, as well as recommended conservation uses, ownership, and management guidelines for such land. The conservation findings shall also indicate preferred locations for development if the plan is denied based upon such findings.
C.
Minimum preserved open space. The plan shall show that at least 50% of the tract will be preserved by a conservation restriction for a tract of land served by public sewer or 40% if the tract of land is not served by sewer. The proportion of jurisdictional wetlands and steep slopes, as defined below, which can be included in the minimum required preserved area of open space shall be directly proportional (1:1) to the percentage of such areas found in the parent parcel. For example, if jurisdictional wetlands and steep slopes comprise 25% of the parent parcel, then up to 25% of the required protected open space can contain such jurisdictional wetlands and steep slopes.
10.1.4
Maximum number of dwelling units.
A.
The maximum number of residential units in an OSRD is determined through submission of a "yield plan," which is essentially a plan meeting most of the standards of a preliminary subdivision plan according to Ayer's Rules and Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land, with some additional information as described below. The yield plan shall show the maximum number of lots and/or dwelling units ("base lot/unit yield") that could be placed upon the site in a conventional subdivision, in full conformance with all applicable provisions of the Ayer Zoning Bylaw, Subdivision Regulations, state and local health laws and regulations, the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, local Wetlands Protection Bylaw and other applicable requirements.
B.
The yield plan and preliminary subdivision plan may be submitted at the time of preliminary plan application, or, in cases when a preliminary subdivision plan is not submitted, the yield plan shall be submitted with the definitive subdivision plan application. In cases where a proposed development does not involve subdivision of the original tract of land in an OSRD application, a yield plan shall still be required.
C.
No land that is unusable for building due to being subject to an easement, or otherwise legally restricted, shall be included as land available for development. The applicant shall have the burden of proof to demonstrate that the maximum number of lots and dwelling units resulting from the design and preliminary engineering specifications shown on the yield plan is feasible.
D.
Yield plan requirements:
(1)
Title and name of subdivision.
(2)
A locus plan at a scale of one inch equals 1,000 feet (1" = 1,000').
(3)
The zoning classification of the parcel being subdivided, including any zoning district boundaries.
(4)
The boundaries of the parcel being subdivided, reference point north, date, datum (NAD 83 and NAVD 88), scale and legend.
(5)
The names, addresses and telephone numbers of the record owner(s), the applicant, and the names, addresses, telephone numbers, stamps and signatures of the engineer and surveyor and/or landscape architect responsible for the preparation of the plan.
(6)
Prominent landscape elements that might be contributory to the site's preserved open space network, including topographic features, open landscapes, woodlands, water and wetlands, as well as man-made cultural and historic resources. Publicly available sources such as the MA Natural Heritage series, MA GIS Wetlands Resources mapping, MA Historical Commission, and other sources, may be employed in this assessment. In cases where a professional wetland delineation has been prepared, such formal wetland delineation is preferable to general wetland locational information from publicly available sources.
(7)
Locations of all existing and proposed features and amenities, including trails, recreation areas, pedestrian and bicycle paths, community buildings, and off-street parking areas.
(8)
All proposed lot lines with lot dimensions and land area, as well as proposed common areas. In cases where the proposed OSRD development involves any type of attached dwellings, the units shall be depicted with their approximate layout, location and applicable lot lines to the extent known at this preliminary stage. For the purpose of this item, "land area" is "lot area" as defined in the Ayer Zoning Bylaw. To facilitate this calculation on properties containing bodies of water or other areas excluded by the bylaw from lot area calculations, applicants shall show gross parcel area and the area of any bodies of water, in addition to lot areas.
(9)
Topography of the land at two-foot contour intervals, based upon field survey. At the discretion of the Town Planner, and with the concurrence of the Planning Board, applicant may request submission of wider contour intervals, based upon US Geological Survey data, Natural Resources Conservation Service soils maps, MA Geographic Information System layers, or other publicly available sources, as well as any existing topographic survey.
(10)
Existing and proposed lines and widths of streets, rights-of-way, sidewalks, access and utility easements, and other known encumbrances on the property.
(11)
Proposed roadway grades, which may be approximate if general topographic data per requirement nine above is being used.
(12)
The approximate location and type of stormwater management facilities, drawn at the conceptual engineering level without design detail and data. All proposed major elements of the site system shall be indicated in their approximate future locations, whether closed collection and discharge, open retention/detention, natural stormwater flow, or bioretention components. A narrative shall be provided summarizing the general approach to stormwater management on the site.
(13)
The proposed sanitary sewer system and water distribution system, drawn to a conceptual engineering level, accompanied by any available soils and hydrological information.
E.
The Planning Board shall review the yield plan and make a finding as to the base lot yield and/or dwelling units upon accepting a preliminary plan for consideration, or at the first meeting of the public hearing in cases where a preliminary plan is not submitted. The Planning Board shall provide its findings on lot and/or unit yield in writing to the applicant.
F.
To be counted towards the base lot yield, a proposed building lot must meet applicable lot area, frontage and other dimensional requirements, and have enough non-wetland area, based on the information required by Subsection 10.1.4D, to accommodate a dwelling while meeting all dimensional requirements.
10.1.5
Density bonus.
A.
The unit count determined in Subsection 10.1.4 may be increased through density bonuses in order to advance important goals of the Ayer Master Plan, Ayer Open Space and Recreation Plan, or other planning document approved by the Planning Board and on file in the Planning Department. Density bonuses are given by special permit at the discretion of the Planning Board based upon the expected public benefit. They are calculated by first determining the allowable unit count under Subsection 10.1.4 without rounding fractional units up or down, and then multiplying that number by the percentages associated with each of the following density bonuses and adding them all up for a total. Resulting fractional units, if any, shall be rounded up or down as in Subsection 10.1.4.
(1)
If the applicant allows deeded public access to the open space portion of the property and the Planning Board finds that such public access provides a recreational benefit to the public (such as access to an important natural area, a trail system, other geological interests, etc.): a maximum of 10%.
(2)
Please refer to Subsection 10.3.9 for the inclusionary housing density bonus calculation.
(3)
If the applicant preserves as permanent open space more than the minimum required percentage: a maximum 10% density bonus per additional 5% of the parcel preserved as open space.
10.1.6
Permitted housing types. The allowable residential units may be developed as single-family, two-family, or multifamily dwellings, provided that applicable special permit or site plan review requirements for the land use district are satisfied and that the number of dwelling units does not exceed the allowable unit count in Subsection 10.1.4 above. The subdivision approval and special permit/site plan requirements shall be fulfilled concurrently in one proceeding to the extent practical. Any OSRD application involving two-family or multifamily dwellings shall include a site plan that shows the location, layout, height, and setbacks of such dwellings.
10.1.7
Dimensional and design requirements.
A.
Minimum lot sizes in OSRDs. The limiting factor on lot size in OSRDs is the need for adequate water supply and sewage disposal. Therefore, there is no required minimum lot size for zoning purposes. This does not affect the powers of the Board of Health to require areas on a lot for the disposal of sewage and the protection of water supply.
B.
Setbacks, road frontage, and road requirements. The minimum setback shall be 10 feet from any property line. There shall be no numerical requirements for road frontage in an OSRD, provided that each lot has legally and practically adequate vehicular access to a street across its own frontage or via a shared driveway approved by the Planning Board. All dwellings must comply with applicable Board of Health requirements. The Planning Board may modify the applicable road construction requirements for new roads within an OSRD as provided in the Regulations Governing the Subdivision of Land,[2] if it finds that such modifications will be consistent with the purposes of this § 320-10.1.
C.
Arrangement of lots.
(1)
Lots shall be located and arranged in a manner that protects: views from roads and other publicly accessible points; farmland; wildlife habitat; large intact forest areas; hilltops; ponds; steep slopes; and other sensitive environmental resources, while facilitating pedestrian circulation. Generally, residential lots shall be located the minimum feasible distance from existing public roadways. The Planning Board shall take into consideration the conservation analysis and findings in approving the arrangement of lots.
(2)
Lot, roadway, and driveway layouts, land alterations, and placement of structures shall follow any design guidelines for OSRD which may be adopted by the Planning Board.
10.1.8
Permanent open space.
A.
Open space set aside in an OSRD or as a condition of any special permit or site plan approval shall be permanently preserved from development as required by this § 320-10.1. The Planning Board may not require such open space land to be accessible to the public, unless a density bonus is allowed under Subsection 10.1.5. Any development permitted in connection with the setting aside of open space land shall not compromise the conservation value of such open space land, based upon the conservation findings of the Planning Board.
B.
Permanent preservation of open space land. All land required to be set aside as open space in connection with any OSRD shall be so noted on any approved plans and shall be protected by a permanent conservation restriction to be held by the Town of Ayer, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or a nonprofit conservation organization qualified to hold conservation restrictions under MGL c. 184, § 31. All references to conservation restrictions in these bylaws shall mean a conservation restriction meeting the requirements of MGL c. 184, § 31. The restriction shall specify the permitted uses of the restricted land which may otherwise constitute development. The restriction may permit, but the Planning Board may not require, public access or access by residents of the development to the protected open space land.
C.
Ownership of open space land.
(1)
Protected open space land may be held in private ownership, owned in common by a homeowner's association (HOA), dedicated to the Town or state governments with their consent, transferred to a nonprofit organization acceptable to the Planning Board, or held in such other form of ownership as the Planning Board finds appropriate to manage the open space land and protect its conservation value.
(2)
If the land is owned in common by an HOA, such HOA shall be established in accordance with the following:
(a)
The HOA must be created before final approval of the development, and must comply with all applicable provisions of state law.
(b)
Membership must be mandatory for each lot owner, who must be required by recorded covenants and restrictions to pay fees to the HOA for taxes, insurance, and maintenance of common open space, private roads, and other common facilities.
(c)
The HOA must be responsible for liability insurance, property taxes, the maintenance of recreational and other facilities, private roads, and any shared driveways.
(d)
Property owners must pay their pro rata share of the costs in Subsection C(2)(c) above, and the assessment levied by the HOA must be able to become a lien on the property.
(e)
The HOA must be able to adjust the assessment to meet changed needs.
(f)
The applicant may make a conditional offer of dedication to the Town, binding upon the HOA, for all open space to be conveyed to the HOA. Such offer may be accepted by the Town, at the discretion of the Select Board, upon the failure of the HOA to take title to the open space from the applicant or other current owner, upon dissolution of the association at any future time, or upon failure of the HOA to fulfill its maintenance obligations hereunder or to pay its real property taxes.
(g)
Ownership shall be structured in such a manner that real property taxing authorities may satisfy property tax claims against the open space lands by proceeding against individual owners in the HOA and the dwelling units they each own.
(h)
The HOA documents shall be reviewed by Town Counsel, at the applicant's expense, to assure that they satisfy the conditions in Subsection C(2)(a) through (g) above, and such other conditions as the Planning Board shall deem necessary.
D.
Maintenance standards.
(1)
Ongoing maintenance standards shall be established as a condition of development approval to ensure that the open space land is not used for storage or dumping of refuse, junk, or other offensive or hazardous materials. Such standards shall be enforceable by the Town against any owner of open space land, including an HOA.
(2)
If the Select Board finds that the provisions of Subsection D(1) above are being violated to the extent that the condition of the land constitutes a public nuisance, it may, upon 30 days' written notice to the owner, seek a court order allowing the Town to enter the premises for necessary maintenance, and to assess the cost of such maintenance by the Town ratably against the landowner or, in the case of an HOA, the owners of properties within the development, and if such costs are not paid, to impose a property tax lien on such property or properties.










































































