The town engineer or designee is hereby appointed the floodplain administrator to administer and implement the provisions of this division and other appropriate sections of 44 CFR (Emergency Management and Assistance-National Flood Insurance Program regulations) pertaining to floodplain management.
(Ordinance 2009-4-7E adopted 4/7/09)
Duties and responsibilities of the floodplain administrator shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(1) 
Maintain and hold open for public inspection all records pertaining to the provisions of this division.
(2) 
Review permit application to determine whether to ensure that the proposed building site project, including the placement of manufactured homes, will be reasonably safe from flooding.
(3) 
Review, approve or deny all applications for development permits required by adoption of this division.
(4) 
Review permits for proposed development to assure that all necessary permits have been obtained from those federal, state or local governmental agencies (including section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, 33 U.S.C. 1334) from which prior approval is required.
(5) 
Where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of the boundaries of the areas of special flood hazards (for example, where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions) the floodplain administrator shall make the necessary interpretation.
(6) 
Notify, in riverine situations, adjacent communities and the state coordinating agency which is the state water development board (TWDB) and also the state commission on environmental quality (TCEQ), prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and submit evidence of such notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
(7) 
Assure that the flood carrying capacity within the altered or relocated portion of any watercourse is maintained.
(8) 
When base flood elevation data has not been provided in accordance with section 3.12.037, the floodplain administrator shall obtain, review and reasonably utilize any base flood elevation data and floodway data available from a federal, state or other source, in order to administer the provisions of part III.
(9) 
When a regulatory floodway has not been designated, the floodplain administrator must require that no new construction, substantial improvements, or other development (including fill) shall be permitted within zones A1-30 and AE on the community’s FIRM, unless it is demonstrated that the cumulative effect of the proposed development, when combined with all other existing and anticipated development, will not increase the water surface elevation of the base flood more than one foot at any point within the community.
(10) 
Under the provisions of 44 CFR chapter 1, section 65.12, of the National Flood Insurance Program regulations, a community may approve certain development in zones A1-30, AE, AH, on the community’s FIRM which increases the water surface elevation of the base flood by more than 1 foot, provided that the community first completes all of the provisions required by section 65.12.
(11) 
When a permit is sought for land which lies within an area of uncertain flood hazard or zone A, both as defined in section 3.12.035, require that the person seeking a permit supply sufficient appropriate information (as detailed in section 3.12.073) from which the floodplain administrator will be able to establish the base flood elevations and design flood elevation through the property. When such information has been provided, make a determination as to whether the land lies within or outside of an area of special flood hazard.
(12) 
Determine if the proposed development could result in a significant change to the watershed hydrology. If such a change appears possible, require that the person seeking a permit supply sufficient appropriate information to demonstrate the effect that the proposed development would have on watershed hydrology. Also require appropriate measures to mitigate such effects.
(13) 
On an annual basis, review creek and watershed computer models and floodplain mapping to determine whether the current watershed, creek and floodplain conditions are adequately reflected in the models and mapping.
(14) 
Order regular inspection of all floodplains through the town to determine whether nonpermitted or otherwise noncompliant developments or other alterations have occurred. When such developments or alterations are discovered, require that they be made compliant with the terms of this division or that the creek or floodplain be restored to its prior condition.
(Ordinance 2009-4-7E adopted 4/7/09)
(a) 
Application for a floodplain development permit (including fill) shall be presented to the floodplain administrator on forms furnished by him/her and may include, but not be limited to, plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing the location, dimensions, and elevation of proposed landscape alterations, existing and proposed structures, including the placement of manufactured homes, and the location of the foregoing in relation to areas of special flood hazard. Additionally, the following information is required:
(1) 
Elevation (in relation to mean sea level), of the lowest floor (including basement) of all new and substantially improved structures;
(2) 
Elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any nonresidential structure shall be floodproofed;
(3) 
A certificate from a registered professional engineer or architect that the nonresidential floodproofed structure shall meet the floodproofing criteria of section 3.12.102(2);
(4) 
Description of the extent to which any watercourse or natural drainage will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development;
(5) 
Maintain a record of all such information in accordance with section 3.12.072(1);
(b) 
Approval or denial of a floodplain development permit by the floodplain administrator shall be based on all of the provisions of this division and the following relevant factors:
(1) 
The danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage;
(2) 
The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner;
(3) 
The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others;
(4) 
The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development;
(5) 
The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles;
(6) 
The costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions including maintenance and repair of streets and bridges, and public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems;
(7) 
The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise and sediment transport of the floodwaters and the effects of wave action, if applicable, expected at the site;
(8) 
The necessity to the facility of a waterfront location, where applicable;
(9) 
The availability of alternative locations, not subject to flooding or erosion damage, for the proposed use.
(Ordinance 2009-4-7E adopted 4/7/09)
(a) 
If a fill permit is sought for land which lies within an area of uncertain flood hazard or zone A, both as defined in section 3.12.035, the person seeking a permit shall be required to provide sufficient information to the floodplain administrator from which base flood elevations and design flood elevations relative to the property may be established. Such information may include, but not be limited to, the items listed below, which are intended to set a standard for quality of work, but which will not relieve the applicant of the responsibility to comply with sound engineering and modeling procedures. Additionally, the person seeking a permit is responsible for all fees, data and information required by FEMA or other governing body having jurisdiction in the project area.
(1) 
A current topographic map of the subject land at a scale of 1" = 200' or larger and a minimum contour interval of two feet. Elevation contours shall be based on National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929.
(2) 
Hydraulic modeling (if required) shall include the following as applicable to the current effective model, the modified effective model and the proposed conditions model:
(A) 
A mathematical hydraulic model of the creek and floodplain with cross-section data based on data surveyed on the ground or the above-indicated topographic map. The interval between cross-sections shall generally not exceed 300 feet (smaller intervals are, of course, acceptable, and, in any case, sound engineering and modeling procedures shall be employed).
(B) 
Roughness coefficients shall be field determined and shall generally fall within the ranges specified in the town subdivision ordinance.
(C) 
The model shall be generated for use with the computer program HEC-2, as developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center (use of other programs must first be approved by the floodplain administrator).
(D) 
The flows to be used in the model shall be obtained from the floodplain administrator.
(E) 
The model shall connect to and be compatible with other existing hydraulic models within one-half mile upstream or one-half mile downstream of the proposed development, if such models have been approved by the floodplain administrator.
(F) 
Where no approved hydraulic models exist upstream or downstream of the proposed development, the model shall extend a minimum of one-half mile upstream and one-half mile downstream of the proposed development.
(G) 
Provide a detailed description of the method used for determining the standing water surface elevation.
(H) 
Provide a description of modeling techniques, and assumptions made, and special or unusual conditions encountered.
(I) 
Using the topographic map referred to in subsection (a)(1) of this section as a basis, delineate the base floodplain and design floodplain as determined through hydraulic modeling.
(J) 
Provide a profile of the creek showing the creek bed and water surface elevations for the base and design floods.
(K) 
Provide plotted sections for effective, modified effective, and proposed conditions hydraulic models.
(L) 
Provide a diskette containing the model (ASCII format) to the floodplain administrator.
(3) 
Hydrologic modeling (if required).
(A) 
Unless otherwise approved by the floodplain administrator, hydrologic modeling of the proposed development shall be generated for use with the computer program HEC-1, as developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center. The current effective hydrologic model of the watershed shall be obtained from the floodplain administrator.
(B) 
Demonstrate that the unmodified current effective model may be used on the applicant’s computer to duplicate the results on file with the town.
(C) 
Develop a model of the watershed with proposed development in place, using the town’s current effective model as a platform.
(D) 
Provide detailed calculations substantiating all modeling parameters which would be affected by the proposed development.
(E) 
Provide a description of modeling techniques, any assumptions made, and special or unusual conditions encountered.
(F) 
Provide a diskette containing the model (ASCII format) to the floodplain administrator.
(4) 
Certification by a registered professional engineer, attesting to the methods used, modeling results and floodplain delineation accuracy.
(b) 
A fill permit shall be required for all development within areas of special flood hazard within the town. Application for a fill permit shall be presented to the floodplain administrator on permit forms provided by the town or facsimiles thereof, which include drawings (to scale) and technical information sufficient to fully support the compliance of the proposed development with the provisions of this division. These data shall include, but are not necessarily limited to, information which demonstrates the effects of such development on the floodplain, including impacts on the floodplains, flood elevations, and velocities within the channel of the ten-year and 100-year mean recurrence interval floods and in the discharges of the effective FIS upstream of, downstream of, and along or through the proposed development, and further, the person making application shall:
(1) 
Show the lowest floor elevated to a minimum of three feet above the base flood elevation or to two feet above the design flood elevation, whichever is higher. In locations of assumed critical depth, the energy gradient shall be used to establish these respective minimum lowest floor elevations.
(2) 
Furnish delineations of existing and post-development floodplains.
(3) 
Demonstrate, with technical data, the impacts on the design flood storage capacity of the floodplain. The town has adopted the policy of restricting the loss of valley storage to 0% of the design floodplain.
(4) 
Demonstrate, with technical data, that the flood-carrying capacity within the altered or relocated portion of any watercourse is maintained.
(5) 
Demonstrate with technical data that, at any point within the town, the watershed or the creek, the effect of the proposed development:
(A) 
Will not increase the water surface elevations of the design flood (full urbanized watershed);
(B) 
Will not increase the base flood (existing condition watershed) elevations;
(C) 
Will not increase velocities to an erosive level;
(D) 
Otherwise meets the provisions of part III of this division.
(6) 
Prepare technical data for the floodplain administrator’s review and submittal to FEMA.
(7) 
Affirm that all necessary permits have been obtained from those federal (Corps of Engineers, section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (being 33 USC 1344), FEMA conditional and final approval, and EPA NPDES permits), state, and other local governmental agencies from which prior approval is required.
(c) 
Approval or denial of a fill permit by the floodplain administrator shall be based on all of the provisions of this division and the following relevant factors:
(1) 
Adequacy and completeness of information and data accompanying the permit application for the purpose of making an informed, qualified determination;
(2) 
The danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage;
(3) 
The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner;
(4) 
The danger that materials may float onto other lands to the injury of others;
(5) 
The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development;
(6) 
The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles;
(7) 
The costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions, including maintenance and repair of streets and bridges and public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems;
(8) 
The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise and sediment transport of the floodwaters and the effects of wave action, if applicable, expected at the site;
(9) 
The necessity to the facility of a waterfront location, where applicable;
(10) 
The availability of alternative locations, not subject to flooding or erosion damage, for the proposed use;
(11) 
The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan for that area.
(Ordinance 2009-4-7E adopted 4/7/09)
(a) 
The appeal board, as established by the community, shall hear and render judgment on requests for variances from the requirements of this division.
(b) 
The appeal board shall hear and render judgment on an appeal only when it is alleged there is an error in any requirement, decision, or determination made by the floodplain administrator in the enforcement or administration of this division.
(c) 
Any person or persons aggrieved by the decision of the appeal board may appeal such decision in the courts of competent jurisdiction.
(d) 
The floodplain administrator shall maintain a record of all actions involving an appeal and shall report variances to the Federal Emergency Management Agency upon request.
(e) 
Variances may be issued for the reconstruction, rehabilitation or restoration of structures listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the State Inventory of Historic Places, without regard to the procedures set forth in the remainder of this division.
(f) 
Variances may be issued for new construction and substantial improvements to be erected on a lot of 1/2 acre or less in size contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below the base flood level, providing the relevant factors in section 3.12.073(b) have been fully considered. As the lot size increases beyond the 1/2 acre, the technical justification required for issuing the variance increases.
(g) 
Upon consideration of the factors noted above and the intent of this division, the appeal board may attach such conditions to the granting of variances as it deems necessary to further the purpose and objectives of section 3.12.033.
(h) 
Variances shall not be issued within any designated floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result.
(i) 
Variances may be issued for the repair or rehabilitation of historic structures upon a determination that the proposed repair or rehabilitation will not preclude the structure’s continued designation as a historic structure and the variance is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character and design of the structure.
(j) 
Prerequisites for granting variances:
(1) 
Variances shall only be issued upon a determination that the variance is the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief.
(2) 
Variances shall only be issued upon:
(A) 
Showing a good and sufficient cause;
(B) 
A determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant; and
(C) 
A determination that the granting of a variance will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extraordinary public expense, create nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of the public, or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances.
(3) 
Any application to which a variance is granted shall be given written notice that the structure will be permitted to be built with the lowest floor elevation below the base flood elevation, and that the cost of flood insurance will be commensurate with the increased risk resulting from the reduced lowest floor elevation.
(k) 
Variances may be issued by a community for new construction and substantial improvements and for other development necessary for the conduct of a functionally dependent use provided that:
(1) 
The criteria outlined in subsections (a)-(i) above are met; and
(2) 
The structure or other development is protected by methods that minimize flood damages during the base flood and create no additional threats to public safety.
(Ordinance 2009-4-7E adopted 4/7/09)