The city council finds and declares the following:
A.
The Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (the "AUMA"), was approved by the voters of the state of California on November 8, 2016. The AUMA adds Section 11362.1 to the Health and Safety Code, which makes it "lawful under state and local law" for persons twenty-one years of age or older to "possess, process, transport, purchase, obtain, or give away to persons twenty-one years of age or older without any compensation whatsoever" up to twenty-eight and one-half grams of marijuana not in the form of concentrated cannabis or up to eight grams of marijuana in the form of concentrated cannabis. The provisions of the AUMA related to the possession, use, and cultivation of marijuana became effective on November 9, 2016.
B.
To regulate the commercial use of non-medical marijuana, the AUMA adds Division 10 (Marijuana) to the Business and Professions Code, Sections 26000 et seq., which grants state agencies the authority to create, issue, renew, discipline, suspend, or revoke licenses for marijuana businesses. The AUMA provides that the state shall begin issuing licenses to marijuana businesses under Division 10 of the Business and Professions Code by January 1, 2018.
C.
Business and Professions Code Section 26055(e) provides that a state licensing authority shall not approve an application for a state license for commercial non-medical marijuana activity, if approval of the state license will violate the provisions of any local ordinance.
D.
The AUMA permits cities to: (1) adopt and enforce local ordinances to regulate non-medical marijuana businesses, including, but not limited to, local zoning and land use requirements, business license requirements, and requirements related to reducing exposure to secondhand smoke; or (2) completely prohibit the establishment or operation of marijuana businesses within its jurisdiction.
E.
The AUMA allows for the planting, cultivation, harvesting, drying and processing ("cultivation activities") of up to six marijuana plants in, or upon the grounds of, a private residence, as well as the possession of any marijuana produced by the plants. The AUMA authorizes a city to enact and enforce an ordinance that reasonably regulates cultivation activities, and to completely prohibit cultivation activities outdoors upon the grounds of a private residence unless the California Attorney General determines that non-medical use of marijuana is lawful in the state under federal law.
F.
On October 9, 2015, Governor Brown signed Assembly Bill No. 243, Assembly Bill No. 266, and Senate Bill 643 into law, which are now collectively known as the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (hereinafter "MCRSA"). The MCRSA establishes a state licensing scheme for commercial medical marijuana uses, while protecting local control by requiring that all such businesses must have a local license or permit to operate in addition to a state license. The MCRSA allows a city to completely prohibit commercial medical marijuana activities, including the cultivation of medical marijuana.
G.
In 1996, the voters of the state of California approved Proposition 215 (codified as California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5, and entitled "The Compassionate Use Act of 1996" or "CUA"). The intent of Proposition 215 was to enable persons who are in need of marijuana for medical purposes to use it without fear of criminal prosecution under limited, specified circumstances. The proposition further provides that "nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede legislation prohibiting persons from engaging in conduct that endangers others, or to condone the diversion of marijuana for non-medical purposes." The ballot arguments supporting Proposition 215 expressly acknowledged that "Proposition 215 does not allow unlimited quantities of marijuana to be grown anywhere."
H.
In 2004, the Legislature enacted Senate Bill 420 (codified as California Health and Safety Code sections 11362.7, et seq., and referred to as the "Medical Marijuana Program" or "MMP") to clarify the scope of Proposition 215, and to provide qualified patients and primary caregivers who collectively or cooperatively cultivate marijuana for medical purposes with a limited defense to certain specified state criminal statutes. Assembly Bill 2650 (2010) and Assembly Bill 1300 (2011) amended the Medical Marijuana Program to expressly recognize the authority of counties and cities to "[a]dopt local ordinances that regulate the location, operation, or establishment of a medical marijuana cooperative or collective" and to civilly and criminally enforce such ordinances.
I.
In City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health and Wellness Center, Inc. (2013) 56 Cal. 4th 729, the California Supreme Court held that "[n]othing in the CUA or the MMP expressly or impliedly limits the inherent authority of a local jurisdiction, by its own ordinances, to regulate the use of its land..." Additionally, in Maral v. City of Live Oak (2013) 221 Cal. App.4th 975, the Court of Appeal held that "there is no right—and certainly no constitutional right—to cultivate medical marijuana…" The Court in Maral affirmed the ability of a local governmental entity to prohibit the cultivation of marijuana under its land use authority.
J.
The Federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. Section 801, et seq., classifies marijuana as a Schedule I Drug, which is defined as a drug or other substance that has a high potential for abuse, that has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and that has not been accepted as safe for use under medical supervision. The Federal Controlled Substances Act makes it unlawful, under federal law, for any person to cultivate, manufacture, distribute or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute or dispense, marijuana. The Federal Controlled Substances Act contains no exemption for the cultivation, manufacture, distribution, dispensation, or possession of marijuana for any purposes.
K.
Cities in California have reported negative effects of marijuana cultivation, processing and distribution activities, including offensive odors, illegal sales and distribution of marijuana, trespassing, theft, violent robberies and robbery attempts, fire hazards, and problems associated with mold, fungus, and pests. Furthermore, as marijuana plants begin to flower, and for a period of two months or more, the plants produce a strong, unique odor, offensive to many people, and detectable far beyond property boundaries if grown outdoors. This odor can have the effect of encouraging theft by alerting persons to the location of the valuable plants, and creating a risk of burglary, robbery or armed robbery of the plants and creating the potential for violent acts related to such criminal activity.
L.
Marijuana cultivation in the city can adversely affect the health, safety, and well-being of city residents, visitors and workers. Regulating marijuana cultivation in the city is proper and necessary to avoid the risks of criminal activity, degradation of the natural environment, and malodorous smells that may result from unregulated marijuana cultivation, and that are especially significant if the amount of marijuana cultivated on a single premises is not regulated and substantial amounts of marijuana are thereby allowed to be concentrated in one place.
M.
The justification for regulating or banning commercial marijuana cultivation pursuant to the city's police power includes, but is not limited to: (1) The increased risk to public health and safety, based on the value of marijuana plants and flowers and the accompanying threat of break-ins, robbery and theft, and attendant violence and injury; (2) the strong "skunk like" malodorous fumes emitted from mature plants which can interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring properties by their occupants; and (3) the potential for theft and use by school age children where marijuana is cultivated in a visible location, particularly where such location is close to schools.
N.
As recognized by the Attorney General's August 2008 Guidelines for the security and non-diversion of marijuana grown for medical use, marijuana cultivation or other concentration of marijuana in any location or premises without adequate security increases the risk that surrounding homes or businesses may be negatively impacted by nuisance activity such as loitering or crime.
(Ord. 16-01 § 1; Ord. 17-02 § 1)