[Ord. No. 2045, Enacted, 8-10-1993; Ord. No. 2137, Amended, 9-17-1996]
LOC §§
32.14.031 to
32.14.042 hereby establishes the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program of the City of Lake Oswego (the "NTMP"). The purpose of the NTMP is to give citizens and neighborhoods greater participation in decisions regarding traffic management on neighborhood collectors and local streets in order to promote the safety and livability of residential neighborhoods through the use of education, traffic management devices and enforcement recommendations where appropriate.
[Ord. No. 2045, Enacted, 8-10-1993; Ord. No. 2109, Amended, 12-20-1994; Ord. No. 2137, Amended, 9-17-1996; Ord. No. 2163, Amended, 12-16-1997]
The following policies shall guide the NTMP:
1. Application
of the NTMP shall be limited to local streets and neighborhood collectors,
as designated in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
This limitation shall not restrict consideration of the impact of
an NTMP project on streets with other functional classifications as
designated in the Comprehensive Plan or from recommending improvements
to such other streets as deemed necessary in order to accomplish the
Goals of the Comprehensive Plan relating to neighborhood traffic,
neighborhood collectors and local streets.
2. Through
traffic shall be discouraged on local streets by routing to major
collectors and arterials as designated pursuant to the Transportation
Element of the Lake Oswego Comprehensive Plan.
3. The
City shall employ traffic management devices to achieve the NTMP’s
objectives. Traffic management devices include traffic circles, speed
humps, diverters, medians, curb extensions, and street closures. "Traffic
management device" does not include "traffic control devices" regulated
by the MUTCD. All traffic management devices shall be planned and
designed in keeping with sound engineering and planning practices
and pursuant to adopted City standards and specifications. The City
Manager shall direct the installation of traffic control devices as
needed to accomplish the project, in compliance with the City Code.
The City Manager may decide not to install a traffic management device
if a traffic control device is justified and will alleviate the problem.
4. Reasonable
automobile and emergency vehicle access shall be maintained. The Fire
Chief and Police Chief of the City of Lake Oswego shall determine
whether a particular NTMP project will maintain adequate emergency
vehicle access.
5. NTMP
projects should encourage and enhance pedestrian, bicycle, and transit
access to public destinations.
6. NTMP
projects shall not significantly increase vehicle miles traveled (VMT)
per capita as defined by the Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 12 Administrative
Rule (OAR Chapter 660 Division 12).
7. Traffic
shall not be diverted from one local street to another as a result
of an NTMP project if:
a. A
traffic management/control device which does not directly divert traffic
will alleviate the traffic problem;
b. Volume
on a street with an average daily weekday traffic (ADWT) of less than
400 vehicles increases by 100 vehicles or 50%, whichever is less,
as a result of diversion;
c. Volume
on a street with an ADWT of greater than 400 vehicles increases by
25% as a result of diversion; or
d. The
diversion would cause the ADWT on receiving streets to exceed 1200
vehicles per day on a local street or 3000 vehicles per day on a neighborhood
collector.
8. Street
closure may only be utilized as a traffic management device in cases
where no other traffic management device will alleviate the traffic
management problem.
9. The
City Public Works Department shall implement the NTMP in accordance
with applicable codes, standards and related polices.
[Ord. No. 2045, Enacted, 8-10-1993; Ord. No. 2109, Amended, 12-20-1994; Ord. No. 2137, Amended, 9-17-1996]
1. Any
ten citizens and/or business license holders or an Association by
vote of its board may file an application for an NTMP project. An
NTMP project application may include a request to install one or more
traffic management devices in order to alleviate a particular traffic
management problem. An NTMP project application may also include a
request to remove or modify an existing traffic management device
or devices. The application shall be filed with the Public Works Department
on such form as is prescribed by the City Manager.
2. Reapplication. An NTMP project that is rejected because it did not qualify for consideration pursuant to LOC §
32.14.034 or is not implemented because it failed the advisory ballot for permanent installation pursuant to LOC §
32.14.039 shall not be reconsidered or resubmitted for a period of three years from the date of the original application. An application for a particular traffic management device that was rejected because the requested device did not comply with engineering standards on the particular street shall not be reconsidered or resubmitted for the same device on the same street. Exception: A reapplication may be filed and considered prior to the expiration of the three year period or otherwise if the applicants submit evidence that demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City Manager that a substantial change in circumstances has occurred since the previous consideration of the project that has had a material negative effect on the traffic volume, speed or safety on the street or segment of street for which the project was previously proposed, or that change the engineering analysis of a particular device. Examples of such evidence include, but are not limited to:
a. The
siting or expansion of a high traffic use;
b. The
construction or modification of a road improvement that has substantially
rerouted traffic onto the street;
c. The
construction of a school or other pedestrian oriented facility abutting
the subject street or segment of street;
d. An
increase of two or more correctable traffic accidents on the subject
street or segment of street since the original application; or
e. A
change in the street configuration or engineering standards that would
change the engineering analysis regarding an application for a particular
device.
[Ord. No. 2045, Enacted, 8-10-1993; Ord. No. 2109, Amended, 12-20-1994; Ord. No. 2137, Amended, 9-17-1996; Ord. No. 2163, Amended, 12-16-1997; Ord. No. 2207, Amended, 7-20-1999]
1. The
City Manager shall gather preliminary data about each NTMP application,
including volume of traffic, physical characteristics of the subject
street, speed and accident information, etc. The City Manager shall
review this information and assign points to each and every application
as follows:
a. Traffic
Volume: Average Daily Weekday Traffic (ADWT) on the segment of the
project street having the highest volume. ADWT shall be determined
by conducting an uninterrupted 48 hour traffic count, which shall
be divided by 200 to determine the point total. The maximum point
score pursuant to this section is 30 points.
b. Speed: Percent of vehicles traveling at least 3 miles per hour over the speed limit on the same segment of the project street used to determine traffic volume pursuant to subsection
(a) of this section, divided by 3. The maximum point score pursuant to this section is 30 points.
c. Accidents:
Five points shall be assigned to project streets for each correctable
accident reported in the last three consecutive years from the date
of the application. Non-correctable accidents shall not be counted.
The maximum point score pursuant to this section is 15 points.
d. Schools:
Five points shall be assigned for each public or private school bordering
on the subject street. Five points shall be assigned to project streets
which are located within a walking area surrounding a school as designated
by a school district if the walking area does not have sidewalks or
pathways.
e. Other
Pedestrian Areas: Five points shall be assigned for each pedestrian
oriented facility or group of facilities, if adjacent to one another.
"Pedestrian oriented facilities" include but are not limited to elderly
housing, parks, the Library, Adult Community Center, neighborhood
pool, and swim parks. The maximum point score pursuant to this section
is ten points.
f. Street
Without Sidewalks or Pathways. A maximum of five points shall be assigned
if the project street is not bordered by a sidewalk or a pathway.
2. Applications
receiving less than 30 points will not be considered for further action.
3. The
City Manager shall review applications receiving 30 or more points
against the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The
City Manager may deny an application if a capital improvement scheduled
for construction in the CIP will or is likely to alleviate the traffic
problem identified in the application.
4. The
City Manager may decide that no traffic management device be installed
if it will create an unsafe situation.
5. Applications receiving 30 or more points that have not been removed pursuant to subsections
(3) or
(4) of this section, shall be deemed eligible for a traffic management device. Once a project has been approved, it shall be placed on the NTMP Project List in rank order based on the number of points the application received in accordance with LOC §
32.14.034(1). Provided that the application’s rank is high enough and budgeted funds are available as provided in LOC §
32.14.037, the City Manager may proceed with installation of a test device as provided in 32.14.038. In the alternative, the City Manager may refer the application to the TAB for public hearing as provided in LOC §
32.14.036.
6. The City Manager shall notify the applicants in writing of the decision on the application, including the reasons for the decision. A decision to deny an application pursuant to subsections
(2),
(3) or
(4) of this section may be appealed to the TAB if a written notice of intent to appeal is received by the City Recorder within fifteen days of mailing of the written notice of the City Manager. An appeal hearing shall be held as provided in LOC §
32.14.036.
[Ord. No. 2045, Enacted, 8-10-1993; Ord. No. 2109, Repealed, 12-20-1994]
[Ord. No. 2045, Enacted, 8-10-1993; Ord. No. 2109, Amended, 12-20-1994; Ord. No. 2137, Amended, 9-17-1996; Ord. No. 2163, Amended, 12-16-1997; Ord. No. 2207, Amended, 7-20-1999]
1. If the City Manager refers an application to hearing pursuant to LOC §
32.14.034(5) or if the City Manager’s decision on an application is appealed pursuant to LOC §
32.14.034(6), the application shall be scheduled for a hearing before TAB. If more than one application is referred or appealed, they shall be heard in order of date of filing. In addition, the City Manager or TAB chair may defer appeals or referrals to additional meetings if the volume would be too burdensome on staff.
2. Determination
of Impact Area. The City Manager shall establish an "impact area"
based upon information obtained during preliminary review. The impact
area shall include all households and businesses fronting on streets
or segments of streets which are projected by the City Manager to
receive more than a minor decrease or increase in traffic volume or
speed as a result of the proposed traffic management device(s).
3. Project
Report. The City Manager shall prepare a staff report describing the
problem, an explanation of the point ranking, the procedures to be
undertaken and recommended solutions and the projected cost of the
recommended solution.
4. Notice.
The City Manager shall mail notice of the hearing at least twenty
days prior to the hearing to all households and businesses within
the impact area and to recognized neighborhood associations, county
planning organizations and other interested associations within the
impact area. The Notice shall explain the proposed project, describe
the impact area, and state that a staff report is available by contacting
the Public Works Department. The written notice shall state that any
person may appear and testify before the TAB concerning the need for
the device, the device itself, the preliminary point total or the
boundaries of the impact area. In addition, Notice of the hearing
shall be posted on a sign large enough for drivers to read in the
impact area. at a point as close to the proposed management device
or devices as practicable.
5. Conduct of the Hearing. The Chair shall open the public hearing and call for general testimony regarding the need for the project, the point total, the proposed traffic management device, or the boundaries of the impact area. The Chair, with TAB consent, may place time limits on testimony. Any member of the public may testify orally or in writing. Written testimony shall either be submitted at the hearing or filed with the Public Works Department by 5:00 p.m. the day of the hearing. Written testimony submitted later than 5 days before the hearing cannot be included in the Board’s packet for the hearing. Following the close of testimony, the TAB shall deliberate on the evidence and testimony in the record, based upon the policies contained in LOC §
32.14.032. Based upon the evidence and testimony, the TAB may:
a. Approve,
modify or terminate the project;
b. Continue
the proceedings for additional information;
c. Modify
the point total; or
d. Modify
the boundaries of the impact area or, if the Board determines that
it needs additional evidence of potential impacts to set the impact
area, defer final determination of the boundaries of the impact area
until after the temporary testing period described in 32.14.038. If
the TAB decides to increase the boundaries of the impact area, it
shall schedule a second hearing on the project and direct that all
households and business that did not receive notice be given notice
and the opportunity to comment prior to further action. If the Board
decides to defer determination of the impact area, it shall consider
the boundaries of the impact area at a public hearing after the conclusion
of the temporary testing period based on evidence obtained during
the testing period. The City Manager shall recommend an impact area
based on this evidence in a staff report. Notice of the hearing shall
be sent to all persons who testified on the application at the first
TAB hearing and, if the City Manager recommends expansion of the impact
area, to all households and businesses in the impact area that did
not receive notice of the original hearing.
6. The
TAB shall adopt an order setting forth its findings and containing
a brief explanation of its decision.
7. Appeal to City Council. A decision of the TAB shall be final unless appealed to City Council by filing a written notice of intent to appeal within 15 calendar days following the date of adoption of the TAB order. Only persons who appeared before TAB orally or in writing regarding an application may appeal a TAB decision on that application. An appeal fee may be established by resolution of the City Council. Notice of the appeal hearing shall be sent twenty days prior to the hearing to all persons who testified either orally or in writing before the TAB regarding the application on appeal. The Council shall hear the appeal on the record before the TAB. No person may testify before the Council that did not testify before TAB. New or additional evidence may only be submitted upon a showing that consideration of such evidence is required by the public interest or that such evidence could not have been offered at the initial hearing by the exercise of due diligence. This new evidence exception shall be strictly construed to encourage submittal of all relevant testimony to the TAB. With these exceptions, the Council shall hear and make a decision regarding the project pursuant to subsection
4 of this section.
8. Once a project has been approved and becomes final, it shall be placed on the NTMP Project List in rank order based on the number of points the application received in accordance with LOC §
32.14.034(1). The NTMP project list, along with copies of the final order on the project, shall be forwarded to the City Manager by November 15 if the cost of the project exceeds the threshold for the CIP and March 15 if the cost of the project is less than the threshold for the CIP for consideration for funding pursuant to the local budget process pursuant to LOC §
32.14.033.
[Ord. No. 2045, Enacted, 8-10-1993; Ord. No. 2109, Amended, 12-20-1994]
1. The
City shall undertake NTMP projects based upon rank and budgeted funds,
beginning with the top ranked project and continuing down the list
until budgeted funds are expended or are no longer sufficient to complete
the project in the fiscal year. The level of funding for the NTMP
shall be determined annually by the City of Lake Oswego Budget Committee
and City Council pursuant to the Local Budget Law (ORS 294.305 to
294.565).
2. Ranked projects that are not initiated in the year ranked because of funding shall be considered and re-ranked in the annual ranking of projects pursuant to LOC §
32.14.034 for three years. If, after three years, a project has not received a high enough priority to proceed, it shall be removed from the ranking list. The project applicant shall be notified when the three year limit expires. At that time a new request may be submitted by the applicant or the City Manager.
[Ord. No. 2045, Enacted, 8-10-1993; Ord. No. 2109, Amended, 12-20-1994; Ord. No. 2207, Amended, 7-20-1999]
1. Once
an NTMP project is approved, funded through the budget process, and
comes up for implementation pursuant to its rank order, the City Manager
shall install a "temporary test device." A "temporary test device"
is a temporary installation of a traffic management device which simulates
the effect of a permanent device. A "temporary test device" can be
the same as a permanent traffic management device where an installation
of a temporary device is impractical or would not result in cost savings
over installation of a permanent device. The temporary test device
shall be installed for a testing period determined by the City Manager,
but in no event shall the testing period be shorter than three months
or longer than six months.
2. The
City Manager shall post a notice adjacent to each temporary test device.
The notice shall:
a. Explain
that the device is temporary;
b. State
the duration of the test;
c. State
that the area will be polled at the end of the test to determine whether
a permanent traffic management device should be installed and shall
include the approximate date that ballots will be mailed;
d. Contain
the name and number of a staff person to contact for additional information.
3. If
the City Manager finds that the temporary test device creates an unforeseen
hazard, the City Manager may revise or remove the device. In this
case, the City Manager shall notify the TAB and the City Council.
[Ord. No. 2045, Enacted, 8-10-1993; Ord. No. 2109, Amended, 12-20-1994]
1. At least 30 days prior to the completion of a test period, or within 30 days of final determination of the impact area where the final determination was deferred pursuant to LOC §
32.14.036(5)(d), the City Manager shall mail a ballot by regular mail to each citizen who resides within the impact area and to each business operator holding a City business license whose business is located within the impact area. If a person is both a citizen and a business license holder, he or she shall only be entitled to one vote and shall be mailed only one ballot. The ballot shall:
a. Present
the question of whether the traffic management device should be permanently
installed in the form of a "yes" or "no" question (if more than one
traffic management device has been installed pursuant to the particular
NTMP project, the ballot shall contain separate questions regarding
each device); and
b. Contain
a statement that ballots must be mailed to the City by a date certain
determined by the City Manager. The deadline date shall be set no
sooner than ten days nor later than 30 days after the date of mailing
of the ballots.
c. Set
forth the number of eligible voters in the impact area and the vote
necessary to implement the project pursuant to subsection (2) and
(3) of this section.
2. Ballots shall be counted no sooner than ten days after the deadline for submittal. Ballots postmarked after the deadline for mailing shall not be counted. Except as provided in subsection
(3) of this section, the project shall be forwarded to the City Council for action if a majority of citizens voting in the impact area vote "yes", if a project does not obtain more "yes" votes than "no" votes it shall be terminated and the temporary test device removed.
3. If fewer than fifty percent (50%) of eligible voters return mail by the deadline in subsection
(1)(b) of this section, sixty (60%) of those must vote "yes" in order to forward the project to City Council for action. If a project does not receive sixty (60%) or more "yes" votes in this circumstance, the project shall be terminated.
[Ord. No. 2045, Enacted, 8-10-1993; Ord. No. 2109, Amended, 12-20-1994]
1. Upon
receipt of a favorable vote, the City Manager shall prepare a report
and submit it the City Council. The City Council shall implement the
approved project based upon available funding pursuant to this ordinance.
2. The
City Council shall direct the City Manager to implement the design,
engineering and installation of the traffic management device, which
shall be based upon sound engineering practice and generally accepted
standards.
[Ord. No. 2045, Enacted, 8-10-1993; Ord. No. 2109, Amended, 12-20-1994; Ord. No. 2207, Amended, 7-20-1999]
Nothing in LOC §§
32.14.031 to
32.14.032 shall be deemed to limit or restrict the authority of the City Manager to install or remove a traffic management or traffic control device when the City Manager determines that it is necessary or advisable to do so in the interests of public safety. The City Manager shall apprise the TAB of all such installations or removals.