The definitions of Section
5.50.010 shall apply to this chapter.
(Ord. 2458 § 2, 2009)
The chief of police shall have sole discretion to enforce the
provisions of this chapter.
(Ord. 2458 § 2, 2009)
A. Anyone who has been issued a fine pursuant to Chapter
5.50 or
5.51 may contest the fine under this chapter by submitting a written request to the chief of police for an appeal hearing, clearly stating the reasons for the appeal, within ten days from the date of service of the fine, together with an advanced deposit of the fines.
B. In lieu of depositing the fine, the appellant may timely submit an approved hardship waiver outlining the extenuating circumstance(s) that warrants waiver of this requirement. If the appellant has timely submitted a hardship waiver, then city approval of the hardship waiver shall be required prior to any appeal hearing made pursuant to this chapter. If the city, at its sole discretion, rejects the hardship waiver, then the appellant shall comply with subsection
A prior to the scheduling of any hearing.
C. Any
hearing before the hearing officer shall be set for a date that is
not less than fifteen, nor more than sixty days from the date the
request for hearing is filed. The person requesting the hearing (hereafter,
the "appellant") shall be notified of the time and place set for the
hearing at least ten days prior to the date of the hearing.
(Ord. 2458 § 2, 2009; Ord. 2496 § 2, 2012)
A. No hearing
to contest a fine before a hearing officer shall be held unless and
until a written request for a hearing has been timely submitted and
any applicable fines have been deposited pursuant to this chapter.
The requirement for a deposit of the fine prior to the holding of
a hearing under this chapter may be waived by the city if appellant
timely submits an approved hardship waiver outlining the extenuating
circumstances warranting waiver of the advanced deposit of the fine.
B. The
hearing officer shall only consider evidence that is relevant to whether
the violation(s) occurred and whether the appellant is the person
responsible for the alarm system.
C. The
appellant shall be given the opportunity to testify and present witnesses
and any relevant evidence concerning the circumstances that gave rise
to the fine.
D. The
formal rules of evidence shall not apply. All relevant evidence may
be considered, and the hearing officer has the discretion to exclude
evidence if he or she finds such evidence to be irrelevant or needlessly
repetitive. The hearing officer has the authority to cut off presentation
of evidence if he or she reasonably believes that the evidence being
presented is irrelevant or needlessly repetitive.
E.
1. The
failure of the appellant to appear at the appeal hearing shall constitute
a forfeiture of the fine, as applicable, and shall be considered a
concession that the fine was properly issued.
2. Notwithstanding
the above, upon a showing of good cause by the appellant, the hearing
officer may excuse the appellant's failure to appear at the hearing
and reschedule the hearing. Under no circumstances shall the hearing
be rescheduled more than one time.
F. The
fine and any additional documents submitted by the peace officer shall
constitute prima facie evidence of the respective facts contained
in those documents.
G. At least
ten days prior to the hearing, the appellant shall be provided with
copies of the fine(s) assessed, reports, and other documents submitted
or relied upon by the peace officer. No other discovery disclosure
is required.
H. The
hearing officer may continue the hearing and request additional information
from the peace officer or the appellant prior to issuing a written
decision.
(Ord. 2458 § 2, 2009; Ord. 2496 § 3, 2012)
A. After
considering all of the testimony and evidence submitted at the hearing,
the hearing officer shall issue a written decision to uphold, modify
or revoke the fine amount, and shall list in the decision the reasons
for that decision. The decision of the hearing officer shall be final.
B. If the
decision is to uphold the penalty, the city shall retain the fine
deposited, if applicable. Where a hardship waiver has been submitted
to and approved by the city and the decision is to uphold the citation,
then appellant shall pay the fine pursuant to this chapter. If the
decision is to revoke or modify the penalty, then the city shall refund
the partial or full fine deposit to the appellant within thirty days
of the service of the decision.
C. The
time for a challenge to the hearing officer's decision in a court
of law is governed by California
Code of Civil Procedure Sections
1094.5 and 1094.6. Notice of the hearing officer's decision shall
include citation to California
Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1094.5
and 1094.6.
D. The
hearing officer's written decision shall be served on the appellant
within twenty days from the date of the hearing by mailing to the
appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested, via the U.S.
mail. Service of the hearing officer's decision shall be deemed to
have been completed on the date of mailing.
(Ord. 2458 § 2, 2009; Ord. 2496 § 4, 2012)