This chapter provides standards and procedures for variances,
which are modifications to land use or development standards that
are not otherwise permitted elsewhere in this title as exceptions
to Code standards. This title cannot provide standards to fit every
potential development situation. The City's varied geography, and
complexities of land development, require flexibility. This chapter
provides that flexibility, while maintaining the purposes and intent
of the title. The variance procedures provide relief from specific
Code provisions when they have the unintended effect of preventing
reasonable development in conformance with all other codes. The variance
procedures are intended to provide flexibility while ensuring that
the purpose of each development standard is met.
(Ord. 389 § 1(Exh. A),
2009)
A. Exceptions and Modifications versus Variances. A Code standard or approval criterion ("Code section") may be modified without approval of a variance if the applicable Code section expressly allows exceptions or modifications. If the Code section does not expressly provide for exceptions or modifications, then a variance is required to modify that Code section and the provisions of Chapter
16.71 apply. Except that a variance shall not be approved that would vary the "permitted uses" or "prohibited uses" of a land use district.
B. Combining
Variances With Other Approvals—Permit Approvals by Other Agencies.
Variance requests may be combined with and reviewed concurrently by
the City approval body with other land use and development applications
(e.g., development review, site design review, subdivision, conditional
use, etc.), however, some variances may be subject to approval by
other permitting agencies, such as ODOT in the case of State Highway
access.
C. Types of Variances. There are two types of variances (Class B, or
C). The type of variance required depends on the extent of the variance
request and the discretion involved in the decision-making process.
Regulations described in the following sections of this chapter pertaining
to applicability of the type of variance should be considered a guide
only. Ultimately, it is at the discretion of the Planning Official
to determine whether a variance proposal is processed as a Class B,
or C.
D. Application. The variance application shall conform to the requirements for Type II, or II applications (Chapter
16.61), as applicable. In addition, the applicant shall provide a narrative or letter explaining the reason for his or her request, alternatives considered, how the stated variance criteria are satisfied, and why the subject standard cannot be met without the variance.
(Ord. 389 § 1(Exh. A),
2009; Ord. 406 § 1, 2010; Ord. 501 § 1, 2016; Ord. 582, 3/19/2024)
A. Applicability
Class B variances may be granted in the following areas:
1. Sections
within Article 16.2, Land Use Districts, including setbacks; dimensional
standards including lot width, depth and coverage; street frontage
requirements; structure height;
2. Sections
within Article 16.3, Specific Area Plan Districts and Overlay Zones;
3. Sections
within Article 16.4, Community Design Standards, including access
and circulation, landscaping, street trees, fencing and screening,
parking and loading, signs and the Happy Valley Style design standards;
4. Sections
within Article 16.5, Public Facilities;
5. Other
development standards as specified by the Land Development Code.
B. Procedures. Class B variances are reviewed using a Type II procedure, as governed by Chapter
16.61, using the approval criteria in subsections
C through
G below. Staff may impose such conditions as are deemed necessary to mitigate any adverse impacts which may result from granting relief.
C. Variance
to Development Standards. The Planning Official or designee may grant
a Class B variance of up to 20% from any dimensional or development
review standard except for lot area which shall be limited to 10%
for a Class B variance if the applicant demonstrates compliance with
all of the following criteria:
1. The
variance requested is required due to the lot configuration, or other
conditions of the site;
2. That
the condition requiring the variance has not been intentionally created
to circumvent the Land Development Code;
3. That
the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of
the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor
substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development
of adjacent property;
4. That
the variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that will afford
relief and is the least modification possible of the development provisions
which are in question;
5. The
variance will not result in violation(s) of any other adopted ordinance
or Code standard; each Code standard to be modified shall require
a separate variance request;
6. In
granting the variance, the Planning Official or designee may attach
such reasonable conditions and safeguards as it may deem necessary
to implement the purposes of this title.
D. Variance
to Vehicular Access and Circulation Standards. Where vehicular access
and circulation cannot be reasonably designed to conform to the standards
of this title within a particular parcel, shared access with an adjoining
property shall be considered. If shared access in conjunction with
another parcel is not feasible, the City may grant a variance to the
access requirements after finding all of the following:
1. There
is not adequate physical space for shared access, or the owners of
abutting properties do not agree to execute a joint access easement;
2. There
are no other alternative access points on the street in question or
from another street;
3. The
access separation requirements cannot be met;
4. The
request is the minimum variance required to provide adequate access;
5. The
approved access or access approved with conditions will result in
a safe access;
6. The vision clearance requirements of Chapter
16.50 will be met; and
7. Variances
for street access deviations shall be subject to review and approval
by the roadway authority.
E. Variance to Street Tree Requirements. The City may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for a variance to the street tree requirements in Chapter
16.42, after finding the following:
1. Installation
of the tree would interfere with existing utility lines, and no substitute
tree with a lower canopy is appropriate for the site;
2. The
tree would cause visual clearance problems; or
3. There
is not adequate space in which to plant a street tree; and
4. The
City may require the installation of additional or replacement landscaping
elsewhere on the site (e.g., parking lot area trees) to compensate
for the street tree variance;
5. Street
tree approval or modification of standards within an ODOT or Clackamas
County right-of-way may require approval, respectively, by ODOT or
Clackamas County.
F. Variance
to Parking and Loading Standards.
1. The City may approve variances to the minimum or maximum standards for off-street parking (quantities and dimensions of parking spaces) in Chapter
16.43 upon finding all of the following:
a. The individual characteristics of the use at that location require
more or less parking than is generally required for a use of this
type and intensity, or modified parking dimensions, as demonstrated
by a parking analysis or other facts provided by the applicant;
b. The need for additional parking cannot reasonably be met through
provision of on-street parking or shared parking with adjacent or
nearby uses; and
c. All other Code standards are met.
2. The City may reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces pursuant to Chapter
16.71, if the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed use by its nature would be reasonably anticipated to generate a lesser need for bicycle parking.
3. The
City may allow a reduction in the amount of vehicle stacking area
required in for drive-through facilities if such a reduction is deemed
appropriate after analysis of the size and location of the development,
limited services available and other pertinent factors.
4. The
City may modify the loading area standards if such a reduction is
deemed appropriate after analysis of the use, anticipated shipping
or delivery traffic generated by the use and alternatives for loading/unloading,
such as use of on-or off-street parking areas during non-business
hours, provided that traffic is not impeded.
G. Variance
to Maximum or Minimum Yard Setbacks to Avoid or Reduce Impacts to
Floodplains, Significant Trees, Wetlands, or Other Natural Features.
The City may grant a variance to the applicable setback requirements
of greater than 20% for the purpose of avoiding or reducing impact
to floodplains, significant trees, wetlands, or other natural features.
Modification of the standard shall not be more than is necessary for
the preservation of the nature feature to be protected.
(Ord. 389 § 1(Exh. A),
2009; Ord. 406 § 1, 2010; Ord. 539 § 1, 2018)
A. Applicability. Class C variance requests are those that do not conform to the provisions of Section
16.71.040 (Class B), and that meet the criteria in subsections (B)(1) through (5) below. Class C variances shall be reviewed using a Type III procedure, in accordance with Chapter
16.61.
B. Approval
Criteria. The City shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny
an application for a variance based on all of the following criteria:
1. The
variance requested is required due to the lot configuration, or other
conditions of the site;
2. That
the condition requiring the variance has not been intentionally created
to circumvent the Land Development Code;
3. That
the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of
the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, or
substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development
of adjacent property;
4. That
the variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that will afford
relief and is the least modification possible of the development provisions
which are in question;
5. The
variance will not result in violation(s) of any other adopted ordinance
or Code standard; each Code standard to be modified shall require
a separate variance request;
6. In
granting the variance, the City Administrator or appropriate and designated
body or agent may attach such reasonable conditions and safeguards
as it may deem necessary to implement the purposes of this title.
(Ord. 389 § 1(Exh. A),
2009; Ord. 406 § 1, 2010; Ord. 582, 3/19/2024)
Appeals to variance decisions shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter
16.61.
(Ord. 389 § 1(Exh. A),
2009)
A nonconformity is created when regulations and standards, generally
more recent than certain developmental circumstances to which they
are applied, cause a pre-existing development to fail to meet those
regulations and standards. The purpose of this chapter is to define,
explain and delineate the nonconforming situation and to create a
workable relationship between this title, the nonconforming situation
and the development patterns and trends in the City.
(Ord. 389 § 1(Exh. A),
2009)
A. Purpose.
A nonconforming use is a use of the land, regardless of the conforming
situation of the building or lot, which would not be permitted by
the regulations imposed by this title, but which was lawful at the
time it was established.
B. Continuation
of Use. A nonconforming use may be continued even though not in conformity
with the regulations for the district in which the use is located
as long as it remains otherwise lawful.
C. Enlarging
or Extension of Use.
1. Pursuant
to the provisions and procedures of this chapter, a nonconforming
use may be enlarged or extended within a building or on the same lot
provided that the more restrictive requirements of either the district
involved or the proper district for the use involved applies to such
enlargement or extension; and provided further that all current development
regulations are complied with, and that additional adverse effects
are not created for abutting properties or the neighborhood, e.g.,
objectionable conditions, visual and noise pollution, vehicular traffic,
dust, or street parking, and provided further that the provisions
of this chapter are adhered to.
2. In
cases of practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship, a nonconforming
use in a residential district may be enlarged within its containing
structure or may be permitted to enlarge within the existing floor
area of its containing structure or of its land use.
D. Change
of Use. A nonconforming use may not be changed or altered unless the
change or alteration is to the same use classification as prescribed
in the Development Code or to the classification that more nearly
conforms with the regulations for the district in which the use is
located.
E. Discontinuation
of Use. If a nonconforming use is discontinued for a period of at
least 12 consecutive months, the use shall not be reestablished. For
purposes of calculating the 12 month period, a use is discontinued
or abandoned upon the occurrence of the first of any of the following
events:
1. On
the date when the use of land is physically vacated;
2. On
the date the use ceases to be actively involved in the sale of merchandise
or the provision of services;
3. On
the date of termination of any lease or contract under which the nonconforming
use has occupied the land; or
4. On
the date a request for final reading of water and power meters is
made to the applicable utility districts.
F. Damage
and Destruction. When a building which contains a nonconforming use
is damaged to an extent exceeding 75% of its valuation, the nonconforming
use shall not be reestablished. Buildings and uses that conform to
the Land Development Code requirements may be reestablished. Valuation
shall be determined by an independent fee appraiser who shall be acceptable
to both the City and the applicant. The cost of the appraisal shall
be the sole responsibility of the applicant.
(Ord. 389 § 1(Exh. A),
2009)
A. Purpose.
A nonconforming building is an existing building or tower lawfully
constructed prior to the effective date of this Land Development Code
but which, under the development standards of the currently adopted
codes or regulations, fails to meet the stated minimum standards or
exceeds any stated maximum standards.
B. Continuation
of the Building.
1. A
nonconforming building may continue to exist and be used although
the building may not be in conformity with the regulations for the
district in which the structure is located as long as it remains otherwise
lawful.
2. Normal
maintenance of a nonconforming structure is permitted.
C. Enlarging
or Alteration of a Building. No such nonconforming development may
be enlarged or altered in a way that increases its nonconformity,
but any development or portion thereof may be enlarged or altered
in a way that satisfies the current requirements of this Code or will
decrease its nonconformity.
D. Completion
of a Building. Nothing contained in this title shall require any change
in the plans, construction, alteration or designated use of a building
for which a building permit has been issued and construction work
has commenced prior to the adoption of this Land Development Code,
except that if the designated use will be nonconforming, it shall,
for the purpose of this chapter, be discontinued if not in operation
within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit.
E. Change in Use in a Nonconforming Building (see Section
16.72.020(D)).
F. Damage
and Destruction. When a nonconforming building is damaged to an extent
exceeding 75% of its valuation, such nonconforming building shall
not be reestablished unless the building will comply with the development
standards of all currently adopted ordinances, codes and regulations.
Valuation shall be determined by an independent fee appraiser who
shall be acceptable to both the City and the applicant. The cost of
the appraisal shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant.
G. Relocation
or Removal. Should such development be moved for any reason and by
any distance, it shall thereafter conform to the regulations of this
Code.
H. Roadway
Access. The owner of a nonconforming access connection (i.e., street
or highway access) may be required to bring the nonconforming access
into conformance with this Title and other applicable standards as
a condition of the City or other roadway authority approving a new
access connection permit, or a change in land use.
(Ord. 389 § 1(Exh. A),
2009; Ord. 427 § 1, 2012)
A nonconforming lot is an established lot of record which, under
the development standards of the currently adopted ordinances, codes
and regulations, fails to meet the stated minimum standards or exceeds
any stated maximum standards.
A. Continuation
of the Lot. Any single vacant lot of record at the effective date
of adoption of this Land Development Code may be used for development
even though the lot fails to meet the requirements for area, width
or depth that are generally applicable in the district, provided that
yard dimensions and other requirements pertaining to the lot shall
conform to the regulations for the district in which the lot is located.
Further, no division of lots shall be made which will leave remaining
any separate lot with an area less than the requirements stated in
this chapter.
B. Enlarging
or Alteration of a Lot.
1. Any
nonconforming lot may be enlarged to any extent, even though the lot
may remain in nonconformance; provided the enlargement does not cause
the lot to exceed any stated maximum standards.
2. Any
nonconforming lot may be altered with regard to size, shape and topography,
provided that the degree of nonconformity is not increased.
3. Any
property which is a nonconforming lot may be combined with any other
contiguous property which is under the same ownership for the purpose
of reducing or removing the nonconforming status of either, both or
all lots. When such action has been completed and is on record with
the County Clerk and/or Assessor's offices, the property may be eligible
for permits as determined by the City.
(Ord. 389 § 1(Exh. A),
2009; Ord. 427 § 1, 2012)
A. Purpose.
Before any nonconforming use is enlarged or extended or changed in
any way; before any nonconforming building is extended, enlarged,
rebuilt, moved or changed in any way; or before any nonconforming
lot of record is altered with regard to size, shape and topography,
an application must be filed with the City for such modification to
take place and approval of the application must occur. The required
fee must accompany the application at the time of submittal.
B. Procedure. A Type I or Type II application is required, depending
on discretion, for modification to a nonconforming use.
C. Building
Variances. For modification of a nonconforming building, the application
will be considered by the designated building official and the application
approved or denied based on compliance with all pertinent sections
of this title and with the adopted building code in the City. A copy
of the decision shall be forwarded to the applicant within five working
days after the receipt of application by the Building Official.
D. Lot
Variances. For modifications of a nonconforming lot, the application
will be considered by the Planning Commission or appropriate and designated
body or agent and the application approved or denied based on compliance
with all pertinent sections of this Code. No nonconforming lot may
be enlarged or altered in a way that increases its nonconformity,
but any lot may be enlarged or altered in a way that satisfies the
current requirements of this Code or will decrease its nonconformity.
Any approval or denial shall be based on findings of fact and shall
be documented. A copy of the decision shall be forwarded to the applicant
within five working days after the receipt of application by the City
Recorder.
E. Temporary
Permits. The Planning Commission or appropriate and designated body
or agent after public hearing may permit the temporary use of a structure
or premises in any district for a purpose or use that does not conform
to the regulations prescribed elsewhere in this title for the district
in which it is located, provided that such use be of temporary nature
and does not involve the erection of a substantial structure. A permit
for such use may be granted in the form of a temporary and revocable
conditional use permit, for not more than a 12 month period, subject
to such conditions as will safeguard the public health, safety, convenience
and general welfare. Such permits may be renewable upon reapplication
to the Commission or appropriate and designated body or agent and
the finding by the commission or appropriate and designated body or
agent of a continuing need. However, the finding of a continuing need
by the Commission or appropriate and designated body or agent shall
not necessarily mean that such permit will be renewed.
(Ord. 389 § 1(Exh. A),
2009; Ord. 582, 3/19/2024)