Following a public hearing on the conditional use permit application, the director or the planning commission shall record their decision in writing and shall recite therein the findings of fact upon which their decision is based.
The commission may approve and/or modify a conditional use permit application in whole or in part, with or without conditions, provided that all of the following findings of fact are made in a positive manner:
A. The proposed use is one conditionally permitted within the subject zone and complies with the intent of all of the applicable provisions of this title.
B. The proposed use would not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which it is to be located.
C. The subject site is physically suitable for the type of land use being proposed.
D. The proposed use is compatible with the land uses, if any, presently on the subject property and in the surrounding neighborhood.
E. The proposed use would be compatible with existing and future land uses within the zone and the general area in which the proposed use is to be located.
F. There would be adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health and safety and the project does not affect solar access or adversely impact existing public and private views, as defined by the staff.
G. There would be adequate provisions for public access to serve the subject proposal.
H. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, and general land uses of the Malibu general plan, or, if the general plan is not yet adopted, that: (1) the project will not adversely affect the city's ability to prepare a general plan; (2) the project is likely to be consistent with the general plan being prepared; (3) even if the project is ultimately inconsistent with the general plan, there is no probability of a substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan; and (4) the city is proceeding toward completion of a general plan in a timely manner.
I. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of state and local law.
J. The proposed use would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare.
K. If the project is located in an area determined by the city to be at risk from earth movement, flooding or liquefaction, there is clear and compelling evidence that the proposed development is not at risk from these hazards.
(Prior code § 9447; Ord. 86 § 3, 1993)