The following definitions apply unless in-consistent with the
context:
"Developer"
means a person who is required to or chooses to finance some
or all of the cost of a public street, water or sewer improvement
such that it will be available to provide service to property, other
than property owned by the person, and who applies to the city for
reimbursement for the expense of the improvement.
"Development permit"
means any final land use decision, limited land use decision,
expedited land division decision, partition, subdivision, planned
unit development, applicable public or private infrastructure permit,
or driveway permit.
"Person"
means a natural person, the person's heirs, executors, administrators
or assigns; a firm, partnership, corporation, association or legal
entity; the person's successors or assigns; and any agent, employee,
or representative thereof.
"Public improvement"
means any construction, reconstruction or upgrading of public
water, stormwater, sanitary sewer, or street improvements.
"Reimbursement agreement"
means an agreement between the developer and the city that
is authorized by the city council and provides for the installation
of, and reimbursement for, the cost of public improvements.
"Reimbursement district"
means the area which is determined by the city council to
derive a benefit from the construction of public improvements, financed
in whole, or in part, by the developer.
"Reimbursement fee"
means a fee described in the reimbursement agreement and
set by city council resolution that is required to be paid by a person
who develops property that benefits from the public improvement.
"Resolution"
means a resolution approved by city council that determines
the boundaries of the reimbursement district and the methodology for
allocating a reimbursement fee to each benefitted property that considers
the cost of reimbursing the developer for financing the construction
of the public improvement(s).
(Ord. 6254 § 1, 2018)
Nothing in this subchapter is intended to limit the authority
of the city to submit an application and serve as the developer for
the purposes of establishing a reimbursement district.
(Ord. 6281 § 1, 2018)
The manager shall review an application to establish a reimbursement
district and evaluate whether the district should be formed. The manager
may require that the applicant provide additional information to assist
in the evaluation. The manager shall prepare a written report for
the council that considers and makes a recommendation concerning each
of the following factors:
A. Whether
the developer will finance, or has financed some or all of the cost
of the public improvement, thereby making service available to property
other than the developer's property.
B. The
size and boundary of the reimbursement district.
C. The
actual or estimated cost of the public improvement(s) serving the
area of the proposed reimbursement district and the portion of the
cost for which the developer should be reimbursed for each public
improvement.
D. A methodology
for spreading the cost among the properties within the reimbursement
district and, where appropriate, defining a "unit" for applying the
reimbursement fee to property that may be partitioned, subdivided,
altered or modified in the future. The city may use any methodology
for apportioning costs to a benefitted property that is just and reasonable.
The methodology should account for unbuildable areas such as dedicated
right-of-way, utility easements or open space.
E. The
amount to be charged by the city as an administration fee for the
reimbursement agreement. The administration fee shall be fixed by
the council and included in the resolution approving the reimbursement
district. The administration fee may be a percentage of the total
reimbursement fee expressed as an interest figure, or may be a flat
fee per unit to be deducted from the total reimbursement fee.
F. Whether
the public improvements meet, or will meet, city standards.
G. Whether
it is fair and in the public interest to create a reimbursement district.
(Ord. 6254 § 1, 2018)
The city shall notify the developer and all owners of real property
within the district of the council's decision to adopt or reject the
reimbursement district. If the council approves the district, the
notice shall include a copy of the resolution, the date it was adopted,
and a short explanation that describes the amount of the reimbursement
fee and that the property owner is legally obligated to pay the fee
pursuant to this subchapter.
(Ord. 6254 § 1, 2018)
The city recorder shall cause notice of district formation and
nature of the reimbursement district to be filed in the office of
the Washington County clerk to provide notice to a potential purchaser
of property within the district. Filing notice with the clerk shall
not create a lien. Failure to make such filing shall not affect the
legality of the resolution or the obligation to pay the reimbursement
fee.
(Ord. 6254 § 1, 2018)
Legal action to contest formation of the district or the reimbursement
fee, including the amount of the fee for any lot or parcel, must be
filed within 60 days following the date the resolution approving the
reimbursement district is adopted. Any such legal action shall be
exclusively by Writ of Review pursuant to ORS 34.010 to ORS 34.102.
(Ord. 6254 § 1, 2018)
A. A person
who applies to the city for a permit to develop property within a
reimbursement district shall, upon approval of the permit, pay the
city, in addition to any other applicable fees and charges, the reimbursement
fee established by the council, if within 10 years from the date of
the resolution forming the reimbursement district, the person applies
for any of the following permits:
1. A
building permit for a new building;
2. Building
permit(s) for any addition(s) of a building, which cumulatively exceed
25 percent of the existing square footage in any 36-month period;
3. A
development permit as defined in this subchapter;
4. A
permit issued for connection to a public improvement.
B. The
city's determination of the person responsible for paying the reimbursement
fee and when the fee is due is final.
C. In no
instance shall the city, or any officer or employee of the city, be
liable for payment of any reimbursement fee, or portion thereof, as
a result of the city's determination of the person responsible to
pay the reimbursement fee. Only those payments the city receives from
or on behalf of those properties within a reimbursement district shall
be payable to the developer. The city's general fund or other revenue
sources shall not be liable for or subject to payment of outstanding
and unpaid reimbursement fees imposed upon private property.
D. Nothing
in this subchapter is intended to modify or limit the authority of
the city to provide or require access management.
E. Nothing
in this subchapter is intended to modify or limit the authority of
the city to enforce development conditions which have been or may
be imposed against property in the reimbursement district.
F. Nothing
in this subchapter is intended to modify or limit the authority of
the city to impose development conditions against property in the
reimbursement district as it develops.
G. A person
is not required to pay a reimbursement fee for a public improvement
if the reimbursement fee allocated to property for that public improvement
has been previously paid. A permit will not be issued for any of the
activities listed in HMC 3.18.100(A) unless the reimbursement fee,
together with the amount of accrued interest, has been paid in full.
Where a land use permit has been approved but no subsequent building
permits or other development permits are requested or issued, the
requirement to pay the reimbursement fee expires if the underlying
land use approval expires.
H. A reimbursement
district established under this subchapter shall remain in full force
and effect for a period of 10 years from the date of the resolution
approving district formation. The developer may file with the city
a written application to extend the reimbursement district for up
to five additional years. The application shall describe the remaining
useful life of the improvement(s), the continuing benefit to subject
properties, and explain why there is good cause for the extension.
In considering an application for an extension, the council must provide
notice in accordance with HMC 3.18.070 and hold a public hearing at
which the council will receive public comment. After the public hearing
the council may, by resolution, approve the extension for up to five
additional years after determining that the developer has demonstrated
good cause for the extension and that the value of the improvement(s)
to the subject properties remains sufficient to warrant reimbursement.
If an extension is approved by the council, the city shall provide
notice of the council's decision as provided in HMC 3.18.070 and file
a copy of the resolution with the county clerk as provided in HMC
3.18.080.
I. The
reimbursement fee is immediately due and payable to the city upon
issuance of a permit or connection to a public improvement as provided
in this HMC 3.18.100. If connection is made or construction commenced
without required city permits, then the reimbursement fee is immediately
due and payable upon the earliest date that any such permit was required.
J. Whenever
the full reimbursement fee has not been paid and collected for any
reason after it is due, the manager shall report to the council the
amount of the uncollected reimbursement, the legal description of
the property on which the reimbursement is due, the date upon which
the reimbursement was due and the name or names of the person(s) responsible
for payment. The council shall set a public hearing date and provide
notice of the hearing to the owner(s) of the subject property and
the person(s) responsible for paying the reimbursement fee if different.
Notice may be made by regular mail, certified mail or personal service.
At the public hearing, the council may accept, reject or modify the
manager's report. If the council determines that the reimbursement
fee is due but has not been paid for any reason, the council may,
in its sole discretion and by resolution, take any action it deems
appropriate, including all legal or equitable means necessary to collect
the unpaid amount. However, nothing in this subchapter requires the
city to take action to collect such amounts.
K. A person
who is required to pay a reimbursement fee under this section may
present to the city a full or partial waiver in lieu of paying all
or a portion of the required reimbursement fee. Such waivers shall
be on forms provided by the city, signed by the developer and shall
be acknowledged before any notary public within the state. The waiver
shall expressly state the amount of the reimbursement fee waived by
the developer.
(Ord. 6254 § 1, 2018; Ord. 6281 § 2, 2018)
Public improvements installed pursuant to reimbursement district
agreements shall become and remain the sole property of the city upon
acceptance by the city.
(Ord. 6254 § 1, 2018)
A reimbursement district may be formed and reimbursement collected
for more than one public improvement.
(Ord. 6254 § 1, 2018)
The council finds that the fees imposed by this subchapter are
directly related and proportionate to the benefit conferred on property
within the reimbursement district, and are not a tax subject to the
property tax limitations of Article XI, Section 11(b) of the Oregon
Constitution.
(Ord. 6254 § 1, 2018)
If any section, phrase, clause, or part of this subchapter is
found to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining
phrases, clauses, and parts shall remain in full force and effect.
(Ord. 6254 § 1, 2018)