The following procedures apply to the appeals of final decisions on administrative planning actions made by the Director, and final decisions on quasi-judicial planning actions made by the Hearings Officer. Final decisions on legislative actions and appeal decisions made by the Council may all be appealed to the LUBA, subject to ORS
197.830, "Review procedures; standing; deadlines; issues subject to review; attorney fees and costs; publication of orders; mediation."
A. Appeal Body and Scope.
1. Administrative Permit Decisions (Without a Hearing). An appeal of an administrative permit decision that was made without an evidentiary hearing shall be heard de novo in an evidentiary hearing. The de novo appeal is the initial evidentiary hearing required by state law and shall be conducted in accordance with ORS
197.797 (or successor statute). At the de novo hearing: (a) the applicant and other parties shall have the same opportunity to present testimony, arguments, and evidence as would have been allowed had a hearing occurred in the first instance; and (b) the presentation of testimony, arguments, and evidence is not limited to issues identified in the notice of appeal. See ORS
227.175(10)(a)(D) through
(E).
2. Quasi-Judicial Decisions (With a Hearing). An appeal to the City Council is on the record. The Council shall hold a hearing at least for argument and shall consider the record of the prior proceeding. No new issues, evidence, or arguments not previously presented shall be accepted, except that the Council may, in its discretion, accept additional evidence solely to correct a procedural error in the prior proceeding or to consider evidence that could not reasonably have been presented earlier despite due diligence. See ORS
227.180. Any allowance for new evidence under this subsection must remain consistent with ORS
227.175(10) and the hearing procedures in ORS
197.797. Consistent with ORS
197.195 issue-preservation requirements and ORS
197.797 hearing procedures, on-the-record appeals are limited to issues raised with sufficient specificity below.
3. Limited Land Use Decisions. A local appeal of a limited land use decision is on the record unless the City elects to allow new evidence. If the City allows new evidence, the appeal hearing shall comply with the local quasi-judicial hearing procedures in ORS
197.797 and functions as the initial evidentiary hearing for that matter. See ORS
197.195(5). On-the-record appeals under this subsection are limited to issues raised with sufficient specificity below, consistent with ORS
197.195(6).
B. Right to Appeal Decisions. The following may file an appeal to decisions resulting from planning actions described in this section:
1. Any party of record to the particular action.
2. A person entitled to notice and to whom no notice was mailed. A person to whom notice is mailed is deemed notified even if notice is not received.
3. The Historic Landmarks Commission, the Planning Commission, or the Council by majority vote. No fee is required for an appeal under this section.
4. The City Manager. No fee is required for an appeal under this section.
5. Notwithstanding subsections
B.1 through
4, for decisions on mandatory adjustments made under Section
10.3.080.030(A), only the applicant may file a local or Land Use Board of Appeals appeal, consistent with Section 38(3) of Oregon Senate Bill 1537 (2024) and any successor statute.
C. Filing Appeals.
1. To file an appeal, an appellant must file a completed notice of appeal on a form prescribed by the Department. The standard appeal fee shall be required as part of the notice of appeal.
2. The notice of appeal and appeal fee must be received at the Community Development Department office no later than 5:00 p.m. on the 12th day following the date of the mailing of the notice of decision. (See Section
10.1.110: Computation of Time for an explanation of how days are counted).
3. Notices of appeal shall not be accepted by fax, email, or telephone.
D. Notice of Appeal. Every notice of appeal shall include:
1. Appellant's name and address, and a statement describing how the appellant qualifies as a party.
2. The date and a brief description of the decision being appealed.
3. The specific grounds why the decision should be reversed or modified, based on the applicable criteria or procedural error.
E. Jurisdictional Defects.
1. Any notice of appeal which is filed after the deadline set forth in subsection
C.2 of this section, or which is not accompanied by the required fee set forth in subsection
D.4 of this section, shall not be accepted for filing.
2. Except as provided in this paragraph, the failure to comply with any other provision of subsection
C or
D of this section may be treated as a procedural defect. A procedural defect may be grounds to dismiss an appeal that is not subject to the de novo hearing requirements of ORS
227.175(10). For appeals of permit decisions made without an evidentiary hearing, the City shall not deny the de novo appeal required by ORS
227.175(10)(a) solely because the notice of appeal does not identify specific issues, and the presentation of testimony, arguments, and evidence at the de novo hearing shall not be limited to issues raised in the notice of appeal. Determination of whether an appeal is procedurally sufficient shall be made by the Director, with the advice of the City Attorney, after the expiration of the applicable appeal period described in subsection
C.2. Any such determination shall be reflected in the record of the appealed decision and may be considered in any subsequent review under ORS
197.830 to
197.845.
F. Consolidation of Appeals.
1. If more than one party files a notice of appeal on a planning action decision, the appeals shall be consolidated, and noticed and heard as one proceeding.
2. To the extent the Department's anticipated costs are more than covered by multiple appeals fees received when multiple appeals are filed, the Director may authorize a refund of a portion of the appeal fees to the appellants in an equitable manner.
G. Notification of Appeal Hearing. Except for a de novo appeal hearing that constitutes the initial evidentiary hearing under Section 10.3.020.080.A.1, which shall be noticed consistent with Section 10.3.020.050.D, the notice of appeal, together with notice of the date, time, and place of the appeal hearing, shall be mailed to all parties at least 14 days prior to the hearing.
H. Decision of Appeal.
1. The Hearings Officer or Council may affirm, reverse, or modify the planning action decision being appealed, including approving, approving with conditions, or denying a particular application.
2. The Hearings Officer or Council shall make findings and conclusions, and make a decision based on the hearing record.
3. A notice of appeal decision shall be sent to all parties participating in the appeal.
I. Refund of Appeal Fee. An applicant can request a refund of an appeal fee by letter submitted to the Community Development Department within 10 days after the appeal is determined. The letter shall state in detail the reason for the requested refund. Staff shall prepare a report and send the letter and report to the City Manager. The City Manager may consider the letter, the staff report, and any other factors in making a recommendation. The City Manager's recommendation shall be submitted for action on the City Council's consent agenda. No public hearing is required. Final action on the request shall be taken by the City Council.
J. Final Local Decision and Judicial Review. The City Council's decision on an appeal under this section, and the City Council's decision on a legislative action under Section
10.3.020.060, are the City's final local decisions. To the extent a decision constitutes a land use decision or a limited land use decision under ORS
197.015, judicial review is by the Land Use Board of Appeals under ORS
197.830 to
197.845. For other decisions, judicial review is as provided by state law.
(Ord. 26-1424, 1/12/2026)