The purpose of this article is to implement a general plan policy to require developments with twenty-six or more residential units for purchase to provide units that are affordable to middle income households.
The city council hereby finds as follows.
(a)
The State of California Government Code Sections 65580 and 65589.5 state the following findings and goals for housing:
(1)
The availability of decent housing and a suitable living environment for every Californian is a vital statewide goal. The attainment of this goal requires efforts to accommodate the housing needs of Californians of all economic levels.
(2)
Local governments have a responsibility to use the powers vested in them to provide for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community considering economic, environmental, and fiscal factors and community goals set forth in the general plan. Each locality is best capable of determining what efforts are required by it to contribute to the attainment of the state housing goal.
(3)
California housing has become the most expensive in the nation. Among the consequences are discrimination against low income and minority households, lack of housing to support employment growth, imbalance in jobs and housing, reduced mobility, urban sprawl, excessive commuting, and air quality deterioration.
(4)
The premature and unnecessary development of agricultural lands for urban uses continues to have adverse effects on the availability of those lands for food and fiber production and on the economy of the state. It is the policy of the state that development should be guided away from prime agricultural lands and that jurisdictions should encourage in-filling existing urban areas to the maximum extent practicable.
(b)
The establishment of a middle income housing ordinance by the City of Davis is consistent with the state legislature's housing goals and intent in that:
(1)
The City of Davis is interested in providing housing that is affordable to its local workforce as well as other underserved households. A study of middle income housing needs, impacts, and options completed for the City of Davis found that the Davis housing market is not providing adequate ownership housing opportunities for middle income households. Middle income households cannot afford to purchase even the least expensive market rate housing being developed and cannot qualify for affordable housing units provided for low and moderate income households.
(2)
The City of Davis is using its vested powers to provide for the housing needs for all economic segments of the community and the local workforce in particular.
(3)
Public funds for the construction of middle income housing units are not available.
(4)
The city council has considered the community goals set forth in the general plan and the economic factors related to a middle income housing requirement, including impact on development feasibility. The study of middle income housing needs, impacts and options found that the requirement for middle income units would involve reduced opportunity profits for the housing developer but would not require a construction subsidy.
(5)
The city council has considered the potential environmental effects from the middle income ordinance project and finds that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment or a cumulatively considerable environmental effect in that the project. The project will not affect the amounts or allowable densities of residential development in the general plan. The project would have cumulatively beneficial effect by providing housing opportunities for the local workforce. Workforce housing would reduce traffic congestion and air pollution by Davis workers who otherwise would live outside Davis and commute longer distances to work. city council approves Negative Declaration No. 03-05 for this project.
(6)
The city council finds that the middle income housing requirement project would not discriminate against protected classes including minorities, disabled, elderly and families with children. The effect of the project would be to divert housing production that most likely would have been affordable to higher income households and instead require developers to restrict the sales of those housing units to households qualifying as "middle income." Discrimination based on income is acceptable when it serves a public purpose such as facilitating the ability of households to afford decent, safe, and sanitary housing that otherwise could not. The data in a study of middle income housing needs, impacts and options shows that:
(A)
Shifting some of the housing supply from the above middle income level to middle income level through a middle income inclusionary requirement would most likely not have a significant impact on non-white households, households with disabled persons, and households with children because there are more households of these categories in the middle income level than the above-middle level in Davis, Yolo County, and the Sacramento/Yolo CMSA; and
(B)
There is a slightly higher concentration of elderly households in the one hundred thousand dollars and above income categories than in the sixty thousand to ninety-nine thousand dollars income range which closely resembles the "middle" income range. This could mean that if the city implements a program to require middle income units, there would be a lower proportion of elderly households who would qualify for the housing versus the proportion of elderly households in the higher income categories who would be able to afford more expensive housing. The higher income elderly households, however, would generally be able to find decent housing compared to lower income households.
(7)
The projects will not change the city's existing housing programs and requirements for very low, low and moderate income households.
(8)
The project will provide greater housing opportunities for middle income households as the Davis housing market has not been providing adequate ownership housing opportunities for middle income households.
(9)
The City of Davis is attempting to provide middle income housing to support the community's growth in employment by providing employee housing, retain a balance of jobs and housing, provide mobility, and preserve air quality. The City of Davis is attempting to avoid urban sprawl and excessive commuting.
(10)
The City of Davis is attempting to balance housing programs with agricultural land preservation programs which purchase conservation easements, including mitigation requirements for the conversation of agricultural land by urban development.
(c)
The establishment of a middle income housing ordinance by the City of Davis is consistent with the city's general plan policies which call for a mix of housing types that meet a variety of needs. These policies include:
(1)
Policy LU A.2. Require a mix of housing types, densities, prices and rents, and designs in each new development area.
(2)
Policy Housing 1.1. Encourage a variety of housing types that meet the housing needs of an economically and socially diverse Davis.
(3)
Policy Housing 4.2. Provide affordable housing opportunities for the local workforce in the Davis area.
(4)
Standard Housing 4.2a. A development with twenty-six or more residential units for purchase shall provide units which are affordable to middle income households. Middle income households consist of households earning a gross income of no greater than one hundred eighty percent of the median income for Yolo County adjusted for household size. The number of middle income units shall be equivalent to ten percent for projects totaling twenty-six to thirty-five ownership units, fifteen percent for projects totaling thirty to forty-nine ownership units, and twenty percent for projects totaling fifty or more ownership units.
(5)
Standard Housing 4.2b. Units built under the middle income requirement shall be made affordable to households with gross incomes of one hundred twenty percent to one hundred eighty percent of the median income for Yolo County, with an average affordability for households at one hundred forty percent of the median income for Yolo County.
(6)
Policy Housing 4.3. Promote a linkage between new ownership housing and the local workforce.
(7)
Action Housing 4.3a. Implement an incentive system for the local workforce, such as a lottery, as part of the city's buyer selection process for low/moderate income and middle income affordable ownership units. The system shall provide the highest number of lottery tickets to households with a member of the local workforce.
(d)
The public purposes served by providing housing opportunities for middle income households and the local workforce include:
(1)
Helping the city and school district better serve the public with vital services;
(2)
Helping businesses by facilitating greater employee productivity and morale;
(3)
Enhancing recruitment and retention efforts, and increasing service levels;
(4)
Reducing traffic congestion and air pollution by people who otherwise would live outside of Davis and commute longer distances to work;
(5)
Improving the quality of life for Davis employees by bringing them closer to their place of work.
(Ord. 2234, 2006)