This section governs the procedures to be followed where a decision of the City has been remanded by the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD), the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC), or the Appellate Courts.
(6443)
The Approval Authority for a remanded decision must be the last Approval Authority from which the appeal to LUBA or submittal to DLCD was taken, except that in voluntary or stipulated remands, the City Council may decide that it will hear the case on remand.
(6443)
(A) 
The City must conduct a review on any remanded decision if requested by the applicant in writing or initiated by the City for a City project. The remand procedure must be according to the applicable provisions of this section and the decision by LUBA, DLCD, LCDC, or Appellate Court, and applicable State law. Unless State law requires otherwise, only those persons who were parties to the proceedings before the City are entitled to notice and entitled to participate in any hearing on remand.
(B) 
The review procedures must comply with State law and with the requirements of this code for either legislative or quasi-judicial procedures, whichever was employed for the initial decision or as required by the remand.
(6443)
(A) 
On remand, the Approval Authority must review only those issues that LUBA, DLCD, LCDC, or an appellate court required to be addressed. The Approval Authority has the discretion to reopen the record as it deems appropriate.
(B) 
If additional testimony is required to comply with the remand, parties may raise new, unresolved issues that relate to new evidence directed toward the issue on remand. Other issues that were resolved by LUBA, DLCD, LCDC, or the Appellate Court or that were not appealed are deemed to be waived and may not be reopened.
(C) 
Notwithstanding subsections (A) and (B) above, for remands of City-initiated legislative amendments or for any voluntary or stipulated remand reviewed by the City Council, the City Council may allow the introduction and processing of new work tasks, issues, evidence, and testimony if the Council determines that the information or task is necessary and/or valuable.
(6443)
A decision reversed by LUBA, DLCD, LCDC, or an appellate court that results in a final appellate judgment or order of reversal cannot be further heard by the City in the absence of an amended or new application. Submission of a revised application is governed by the time limit set forth in SDC 5.1.1030, Limitation on Refiling Applications.
(6443)