[Ord. No. 31-2011, § 4, eff. 12-31-2011]
A nonconforming use which has a valid Certificate of Occupancy and lawfully occupies a structure or vacant site on the date that it becomes nonconforming may be continued as long as it remains otherwise lawful, subject to the standards and limitations of this section.
A. Movement, Alteration and Enlargement.
1. Enlargement. A nonconforming use may not be enlarged, expanded or extended to occupy parts of another structure or portions of a site that it did not occupy on the date that it became nonconforming, unless approved by the Zoning Board of Adjustment as a special exception, pursuant to the procedures of Section
922.07 and subject to the following limits.
(a) Limit on Enlargement.
(1) The Zoning Board of Adjustment shall not allow as a special exception any enlargement, expansion or extension that has the effect of increasing the total floor area or lot coverage of a nonconforming use by more than twenty-five (25) percent in a non-residential zoning district or by more than fifteen (15) percent in a residential zoning district, when compared to the floor area or site area coverage of the nonconforming use at the time it became nonconforming.
(2) The lot on which a nonconforming use is situated may not be merged with an adjacent lot for purposes of creating a single larger zoning lot on which a nonconforming use shall be situated.
(b) Limit on Enlargements that Create Other Nonconformities. The enlargement of a nonconforming use that has the effect of making a structure noncomplying or nonconforming in any other respect shall not be permitted as a special exception, but rather shall be construed as a request for a variance, subject to the procedures of Section
922.09.
2. Limits on Improvements. Exterior or interior remodeling or improvements to a structure containing a nonconforming use shall be permitted, provided that any proposed enlargement, expansion or extension shall be subject to the provisions of Section 921.02.A.1.
3. Relocation of Structures Containing Nonconforming Uses. A structure containing a nonconforming use shall not be moved unless the use and structure will comply with all of the regulations that apply in the new location. The Zoning Board of Adjustment may authorize as a special exception a structure containing a nonconforming use to be moved to another location on the same lot only if the Zoning Board of Adjustment determines that such a move will not have the effect of increasing the degree of nonconformity.
4. Change to Another Nonconforming Use. A nonconforming use may be changed to another nonconforming use, as a special exception, provided that the new use shall be of the same general character or of a character that is more closely conforming than the existing, nonconforming use. The determination of whether a proposed use is a conforming use or is less intense than the existing nonconforming use shall be made by the Zoning Board of Adjustment based on factors including, but not limited to:
(a) | Hours of operation; |
(b) | Number of parking spaces; |
(c) | Number of employees; |
(d) | Physical size of building relative to surrounding buildings; |
(e) | Design characteristics of building relative to design features of surrounding buildings; and |
(f) | Traffic generation. |
In addition, in determining whether a proposed change to another nonconforming use is more or less intensive than the existing use, the Zoning Board shall use the Use Classification System of Section 911.02, wherein all residential and mixed use zoning districts are listed in hierarchical order of intensity, with RSD being the least intensive and GI being the most intensive. This hierarchy of zoning districts shall not apply to Special Districts or Downtown districts. Within the Use Classification System, the Zoning Board shall use the following criteria: |
1. | Any use which is permitted as-of-right in a less intensive zoning district shall be considered less intensive than a use permitted as-of-right within a more intensive zoning district. |
2. | Within the same zoning district, a use shall be considered more intensive than another use if the approval required for such use is a higher level in the following hierarchy: as-of-right (P), Administrator's Exception (A), Special Exception (S), Conditional Use (C). |
3. | When two (2) uses cannot be compared according to the above criteria, the Zoning Board shall consider the districts where the uses are permitted, and shall consider the Use Standards of Section 911.04 in determining the relative intensity of use. |
5. Controlling Negative Impacts. The applicant shall bear the burden of proof that the proposed change, or proposed expansion, enlargement or extension of the nonconforming use will not result in greater negative impacts on nearby residents and properties.
B. Abandonment.
1. Effect of Abandonment. Once abandoned, a nonconforming use shall not be reestablished or resumed. Any subsequent use or occupancy of the structure or land site must conform with the regulations of the district in which it is located and all other applicable requirements of this Code.
2. Evidence of Abandonment. A nonconforming use shall be presumed abandoned when any one (1) of the following has occurred:
(a) A less intensive use has replaced the nonconforming use;
(b) Greater than twenty-four (24) percent of the building or structure has been removed through the applicable procedures for condemnation of unsafe structures or otherwise by operational law;
(c) The owner has physically changed the building or structure or its fixtures or equipment in such a way as to clearly indicate a change in use or activity to something other than the nonconforming use; or
(d) The use has been discontinued, vacant or inactive for a continuous period of at least one (1) year, provided this presumption may be rebutted upon showing, to the satisfaction of the Zoning Board of Adjustment, that the owner had no intention to abandon. Where appropriate, the Zoning Board of Adjustment may require contemporaneous documentation of previous use or intended use, such as leases or real estate advertisement, to rebut the presumption.
(e) Nonconforming signs relating to a product no longer available for brand new retail purchase and nonconforming signs relating to a business or service which is terminated or relocated, shall be presumed abandoned after a period of at least one (1) year after the termination of the product, business or service. This presumption may be rebutted upon showing, to the satisfaction of the Zoning Board of Adjustment, that the owner had no intention to abandon. Where appropriate, the Zoning Board of Adjustment may require contemporaneous documentation of previous use or intended use, such as leases or real estate advertisement, to rebut the presumption.