The ordinance codified in this chapter shall be known as the “employer-employee relations ordinance” of the city.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
[1]
Prior ordinance history: Ord. 585.
The purpose of this chapter is to implement Chapter 10, Division 4, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (Section 3500 et seq.) captioned “Local Public Employee Organizations” (the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, or “MMBA”), by providing orderly procedures for the administration of employer-employee relations between the city and its employee organizations. However, nothing contained herein shall be deemed to supersede the provisions of state law, ordinances, resolutions and rules which establish and regulate the civil service system, or which provide for other methods of administering employer-employee relations. This chapter is intended, instead, to strengthen civil service and other methods of administering employer-employee relations through the establishment of uniform and orderly methods of communications between employees, employee organizations and the city.
It is the purpose of this chapter to provide procedures for meeting and conferring in good faith with recognized employee organizations regarding matters that directly and significantly affect and primarily involve the wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment of employees in appropriate units and that are not preempted by federal or state law. However, nothing herein shall be construed to restrict any legal or inherent exclusive city rights with respect to matters of general legislative or managerial policy, which include, among others: the exclusive right to determine the mission of its constituent departments, commissions, and boards; set standards of service; determine the procedures and standards of selection for employment; direct its employees; take disciplinary action; relieve its employees from duty because of lack of work or for other lawful reasons; determine the content of job classifications; subcontract work; maintain the efficiency of governmental operations; determine the methods, means and personnel by which government operations are to be conducted; take all necessary actions to carry out its mission in emergencies; and exercise complete control and discretion over its organization and the technology of performing its work.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated:
means a unit of employee classes or positions, established pursuant to this chapter.
means the city of San Pablo, and, where appropriate herein, refers to the city council or any duly authorized city representative as herein defined.
means an employee who, in the course of his or her duties, has access to confidential information relating to the city’s administration of employer-employee relations.
means to communicate orally or in writing with all affected recognized employee organizations for the purpose of presenting and obtaining views or advising of proposed actions in a good faith effort to reach a consensus; and, as distinguished from meeting and conferring in good faith regarding matters within the required scope of the meet and confer process, does not involve an exchange of proposals and counterproposals in an endeavor to reach agreement in the form of a memorandum of understanding, nor is it subject to Section 2.52.170 et seq. regarding impasse procedures.
means calendar day unless expressly stated otherwise.
means the city manager or his/her duly authorized representative.
means an employee organization which has been formally acknowledged by the city as the sole employee organization representing the employees in an appropriate representation unit pursuant to this chapter, having the exclusive right to meet and confer in good faith concerning statutorily required subjects pertaining to unit employees, and thereby assuming the corresponding obligation of fairly representing such employees. Such recognition status may not be challenged by another employee organization (1) within twelve months of initial recognition and (2) to take effect during a memorandum of understanding having a term of up to three years.
means that the representatives of the city and a recognized employee organization have reached a point in their meeting and conferring in good faith where their differences on matters to be included in a memorandum of understanding, and concerning which they are required to meet and confer, remain so substantial and prolonged that further meeting and conferring would be futile.
means an employee having responsibility for formulating, administering or managing the implementation of city policies and programs.
means (1) an authorization card recently signed and personally dated by an employee; provided, that the card has not been subsequently revoked in writing by the employee, (2) a verified authorization petition or petitions recently signed and personally dated by an employee, or (3) employee dues deduction authorizations, using the payroll register for the period immediately prior to the date a petition is filed hereunder, except that dues deduction authorizations for more than one employee organization for the account of any one employee shall not be considered as proof of employee support for any employee organization. The only authorization which shall be considered as proof of employee support hereunder shall be the authorization last signed by an employee. The words “recently signed” shall mean within ninety days prior to the filing of such proof of support.
means any employee having authority, in the interest of the city, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action if, in connection with the foregoing, the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.
Terms not defined herein shall have the meanings as set forth in the MMBA. |
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
An employee organization which seeks to be formally acknowledged as an exclusively recognized employee organization representing the employees in an appropriate unit shall file a petition with the employee relations officer containing the following information and documentation:
A.
Name and address of the employee organization.
B.
Names and titles of its officers.
C.
Names of employee organization representatives who are authorized to speak on behalf of the organization.
D.
A statement that the employee organization has, as one of its primary purposes, the responsibility of representing employees in their employment relations with the city.
E.
A statement whether the employee organization is a chapter of, or affiliated directly or indirectly in any manner with, a local, regional, state, national or international organization, and, if so, the name and address of each such other organization.
F.
Certified copies of the employee organization’s constitution and bylaws.
G.
A designation of those persons, not exceeding two in number, and their addresses, to whom notice sent by regular United States mail will be deemed sufficient notice on the employee organization for any purpose.
H.
A statement that the employee organization has no restriction on membership based on race, color, religion, creed, sex, national origin, age, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability or medical condition.
I.
The job classifications or position titles of employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate and the approximate number of member employees therein.
J.
A statement that the employee organization has in its possession proof of employee support as herein defined to establish that a majority of the employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate have designated the employee organization to represent them in their employment relations with the city. Such written proof shall be submitted for confirmation to the employee relations officer or to a mutually agreed upon disinterested third party.
K.
A request that the employee relations officer formally acknowledge the petitioner as the exclusively recognized employee organization representing the employees in the unit claimed to be appropriate for the purpose of meeting and conferring in good faith. The petition, including the proof of employee support and all accompanying documentation, shall be declared to be true, correct and complete, under penalty of perjury, by the duly authorized officer(s) of the employee organization executing it.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
Upon receipt of the petition, the employee relations officer shall determine whether:
A.
There has been compliance with the requirements of the recognition petition; and
B.
The proposed representation unit is an appropriate unit in accordance with Section 2.52.100.
If an affirmative determination is made by the employee relations officer on the foregoing two matters, he/she shall so inform the petitioning employee organization, shall give written notice of such request for recognition to the employees in the unit and shall take no action on said request for thirty days thereafter. If either of the foregoing matters are not affirmatively determined, the employee relations officer shall offer to consult thereon with such petitioning employee organization and, if such determination thereafter remains unchanged, shall inform that organization of the reasons therefor in writing. |
The petitioning employee organization may appeal such determination in accordance with Section 2.52.130. |
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
Within thirty days of the date written notice was given to affected employees that a valid recognition petition for an appropriate unit has been filed, any other employee organization may file a competing request to be formally acknowledged as the exclusively recognized employee organization of the employees in the same or in an overlapping unit (one which corresponds with respect to some, but not all, of the classifications or positions set forth in the recognition petition being challenged), by filing a petition evidencing proof of employee support in the unit claimed to be appropriate of at least thirty percent and otherwise in the same form and manner as set forth in Section 2.52.040. If such challenging petition seeks establishment of an overlapping unit, the employee relations officer shall call for a hearing on such overlapping petitions for the purpose of ascertaining the more appropriate unit, at which time the petitioning employee organizations shall be heard. Thereafter, the employee relations officer shall determine the appropriate unit or units in accordance with the standards in Section 2.52.100. The petitioning employee organizations shall have fifteen days from the date notice of such unit determination is communicated to them by the employee relations officer to amend their petitions to conform to such determination or to appeal such determination pursuant to Section 2.52.130.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
If the petition is in order, and the proof of support shows that a majority of the employees in the appropriate unit have designated the petitioning employee organization to represent them, and if no other employee organization filed a challenging petition, the petitioning employee organization and the employee relations officer shall request the California State Mediation and Conciliation Service, or another agreed upon neutral third party, to review the count, form, accuracy and propriety of the proof of support. If the neutral third party makes an affirmative determination, the employee relations officer shall formally acknowledge the petitioning employee organization as the exclusive recognized employee organization for the designated unit.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
Where recognition is not granted pursuant to Section 2.52.070, the employee relations officer shall arrange for a secret ballot election to be conducted by a party agreed to by the employee relations officer and the concerned employee organization(s), in accordance with such party’s rules and procedures subject to the provisions of this chapter. All employee organizations who have duly submitted petitions which have been determined to be in conformance with this chapter shall be included on the ballot. The ballot shall also reserve to employees the choice of representing themselves individually in their employment relations with the city. Employees entitled to vote in such election shall be those persons employed in regular permanent positions within the designated appropriate unit who were employed during the pay period immediately prior to the date which ended at least fifteen days before the date the election commences, including those who did not work during such period because of illness, vacation or other authorized leaves of absence, and who are employed by the city in the same unit on the date of the election. An employee organization shall be formally acknowledged as the exclusively recognized employee organization for the designated appropriate unit following an election or run-off election if it received a numerical majority of all valid votes cast in the election. In an election involving three or more choices, where none of the choices receives a majority of the valid votes cast, a run-off election shall be conducted between the two choices receiving the largest number of valid votes cast; the rules governing an initial election being applicable to a run-off election. There shall be no more than one valid election under this chapter pursuant to any petition in a twelve-month period affecting the same unit. In the event that the parties are unable to agree on a third party to conduct an election, the election shall be conducted by the California State Mediation and Conciliation Service.
Costs of conducting elections shall be borne in equal shares by the city and by each employee organization appearing on the ballot.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
A decertification petition alleging that the incumbent exclusively recognized employee organization no longer represents a majority of the employees in an established appropriate unit may be filed with the employee relations officer only during the month of March of any year following the first full year of recognition or during the thirty-day period commencing one hundred twenty days prior to the termination date of a memorandum of understanding then having been in effect less than three years, whichever occurs later. A decertification petition may be filed by two or more employees or their representative, or an employee organization, and shall contain the following information and documentation declared by the duly authorized signatory under penalty of perjury to be true, correct and complete:
A.
The name, address and telephone number of the petitioner and a designated representative authorized to receive notices or requests for further information.
B.
The name of the established appropriate unit and of the incumbent exclusively recognized employee organization sought to be decertified as a representative of that unit.
C.
An allegation that the incumbent exclusively recognized employee organization no longer represents a majority of the employees in the appropriate unit, and any other relevant and material facts relating thereto.
D.
Proof of employee support that at least thirty percent of the employees in the established appropriate unit no longer desire to be represented by the incumbent exclusively recognized employee organization. Such proof shall be submitted for confirmation to the employee relations officer or to a mutually agreed upon disinterested third party within the time limits specified in the first paragraph of this section.
An employee organization may, in satisfaction of the decertification petition requirements hereunder, file a petition under this section in the form of a recognition petition that evidences proof of employee support of at least thirty percent, that includes the allegation and information required under this section, and otherwise conforms to the requirements of Section 2.52.040. |
The employee relations officer shall initially determine whether the petition has been filed in compliance with the applicable provisions of this chapter. If his/her determination is in the negative, he/she shall offer to consult thereon with the representative(s) of such petitioning employees or employee organization and, if such determination thereafter remains unchanged, shall return such petition to the employees or employee organization with a statement of the reasons therefor in writing. The petitioning employees or employee organization may appeal such determination in accordance with Section 2.52.130. If the determination of the employee relations officer is in the affirmative, or if his negative determination is reversed on appeal, he/she shall give written notice of such decertification or recognition petition to the incumbent exclusively recognized employee organization and to unit employees. |
The employee relations officer shall thereupon arrange for a secret ballot election to be held on or about fifteen days after such notice to determine the wishes of unit employees as to the question of decertification and, if a recognition petition was duly filed hereunder, the question of representation. Such election shall be conducted in conformance with Section 2.52.080. During the “open period” specified in the first paragraph of this section, the employee relations officer may, on his/her own motion, when he/she has reason to believe that a majority of unit employees no longer wish to be represented by the incumbent exclusively recognized employee organization, give notice to that organization and all unit employees that he/she will arrange for an election to determine that issue. In such event any other employee organization may within fifteen days of such notice file a recognition petition in accordance with this subsection, which the employee relations officer shall act on in accordance with this subsection. |
If, pursuant to this section, a different employee organization is formally acknowledged as the exclusively recognized employee organization, such organization shall be bound by all the terms and conditions of any memorandum of understanding then in effect for its remaining term. |
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
The policy objectives in determining the appropriateness of units shall be the effect of a proposed unit on (1) the efficient operations of the city and its compatibility with the primary responsibility of the city and its employees to effectively and economically serve the public, and (2) providing employees with effective representation based on recognized community of interest considerations. These policy objectives require that the appropriate unit shall be the broadest feasible grouping of positions that share an identifiable community of interest. Factors to be considered shall be:
A.
Similarity of the general kinds of work performed, types of qualifications required, and the general working conditions.
B.
History of representation in the city and similar employment; except, however, that no unit shall be deemed to be an appropriate unit solely on the basis of the extent to which employees in the proposed unit have organized.
C.
Consistency with the organizational patterns of the city.
D.
Effect of differing legally mandated impasse resolution procedures.
E.
Number of employees and classifications, and the effect on the administration of employer-employee relations created by the fragmentation of classifications and proliferation of units.
F.
Effect on the classification structure and impact on the stability of the employer-employee relationship of dividing a single or related classifications among two or more units.
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, managerial, supervisory and confidential responsibilities, as defined in Section 2.52.030, are determining factors in establishing appropriate units hereunder, and therefore managerial, supervisory and confidential employees may only be included in a unit consisting solely of managerial, supervisory or confidential employees, respectively. Managerial, supervisory and confidential employees may not represent any employee organization which represents other employees. Professional employees have the right to be represented separately from nonprofessional employees. |
Peace officers may be required, and have the right, to be represented in separate units composed solely of such peace officers. These units shall not be represented by an organization that, directly or indirectly, is subordinate to any other employee organization which includes non-peace officers. |
The employee relations officer shall, after notice to and consultation with affected employee organizations, allocate new classifications or positions, delete eliminated classifications or positions, and retain, reallocate or delete modified classifications or positions from units in accordance with the provisions of this section. The decision of the employee relations officer shall be final. |
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
Requests by employee organizations for modifications of established appropriate units may be considered by the employee relations officer only during the period specified in Section 2.52.090. Such requests shall be submitted in the form of a recognition petition and, in addition to the requirements set forth in Section 2.52.040, shall contain a complete statement of all relevant facts and citations in support of the proposed modified unit in terms of the policies and standards set forth in Section 2.52.100. The employee relations officer shall process such petitions as other recognition petitions under this chapter.
The employee relations officer may by his or her own motion propose that an established unit be modified. The employee relations officer shall give written notice of the proposed modification(s) to any affected employee organization and shall hold a meeting concerning the proposed modification(s), at which time all affected employee organizations shall be heard. Thereafter the employee relations officer shall determine the composition of the appropriate unit or units in accordance with Section 2.52.100, and shall give written notice of such determination to the affected employee organizations. The employee relations officer’s determination may be appealed as provided in Section 2.52.130. If a unit is modified pursuant to the motion of the employee relations officer hereunder, employee organizations may thereafter file recognition petitions seeking to become the exclusively recognized employee organization for such new appropriate unit or units pursuant to Section 2.52.040.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
An employee organization may file a request to become the recognized employee organization of a unit alleged to be appropriate that consists of a group of employees who are already a part of a larger established unit represented by another recognized employee organization. The timing, form and processing of such request shall be as specified in Section 2.52.110 for modification requests.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
An employee organization aggrieved by an appropriate unit determination of the employee relations officer, or an employee organization aggrieved by a determination of the employee relations officer that a recognition petition (Section 2.52.040), challenging petition (Section 2.52.060), decertification petition (Section 2.52.090), unit modification petition (Section 2.52.110)—or employees aggrieved by a determination of the employee relations officer that a decertification petition (Section 2.52.090) or severance request (Section 2.52.120)—has not been filed in compliance with the applicable provisions of this chapter, may, within ten days of notice of the employee relations officer’s final decision, request to submit the matter to mediation by the State Mediation and Conciliation Service, or may, in lieu thereof or thereafter, appeal such determination to the city council for final decision within fifteen days of notice of the employee relations officer’s determination or the termination of mediation proceedings, whichever is later.
Appeals to the city council shall be filed in writing with the city clerk, and a copy thereof served on the employee relations officer. The city council shall commence to consider the matter within thirty days of the filing of the appeal. The city council may, in its discretion, refer the dispute to a nonbinding third party hearing process. Any decision of the city council on the use of such procedure, and/or any decision of the city council determining the substance of the dispute, shall be final and binding.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
All changes in the information filed with the city by an exclusively recognized employee organization of its recognition petition under Sections 2.52.040(A) through (H) shall be submitted in writing to the employee relations officer within fourteen days of such change.
Exclusively recognized employee organizations that are party to an agency shop provision shall provide annually to the employee relations officer and to unit members within sixty days after the end of its fiscal year the financial report required under Government Code Section 3502.5(f) of the Meyers-Milias Brown Act.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
Access to city work locations and the use of city paid time, facilities, equipment and other resources by employee organizations and those representing them shall be authorized only to the extent provided for in memoranda of understanding and/or administrative procedures, shall be limited to lawful activities consistent with the provisions of this chapter that pertain directly to the employer-employee relationship and not such internal employee organization business as soliciting membership, campaigning for office, and organization meetings and elections, and shall not interfere with the efficiency, safety and security of city operations.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
The city manager is hereby authorized to establish such rules and procedures as appropriate to implement and administer the provisions of this chapter after consultation with affected employee organizations.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
If the meet and confer process has reached an impasse as defined in Section 2.52.030, either party may initiate the impasse procedures by filing with the other party a written request for an impasse meeting, together with a statement of its position on all issues. An impasse meeting shall then be scheduled promptly by the employee relations officer. The purpose of such meeting shall be:
A.
To review the position of the parties in a final effort to reach agreement on a memorandum of understanding; and
B.
If the impasse is not resolved, to discuss arrangements for the utilization of the impasse procedures provided herein.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
Impasse procedures are as follows:
A.
If the parties agree to submit the dispute to mediation, and agree on the selection of a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to mediation as set forth in Government Code Section 3505.2. All mediation proceedings shall be private. The mediator shall make no public recommendation, nor take any public position at any time concerning the issues.
B.
If the parties fail to agree to submit the dispute to mediation or fail to agree on the selection of a mediator, or the mediator fails to resolve the dispute through mediation within thirty days after his or her appointment, either party may request that the parties’ differences be submitted to a fact-finding panel.
D.
In arriving at their findings and recommendations, the fact-finders shall consider, weigh, and be guided by all the following criteria:
1.
State and federal laws that are applicable to the city.
2.
Local rules, regulations, or ordinances.
3.
Stipulations of the parties.
4.
The interests and welfare of the public and the financial ability of the city.
5.
Comparison of the wages, hours, and conditions of employment of the employees involved in the fact-finding proceeding with the wages, hours, and conditions of employment of other employees performing similar services in comparable public agencies.
6.
The consumer price index for goods and services, commonly known as the cost of living.
7.
The overall compensation presently received by the employees, including direct wage compensation, vacations, holidays, and other excused time, insurance and pensions, medical and hospitalization benefits, the continuity and stability of employment, and all other benefits received.
8.
Any other facts, not confined to those specified in subsections (D)(1) through (7) of this section, inclusive, which are normally or traditionally taken into consideration in making the findings and recommendations. Those other facts include, but are not limited to: maintaining compensation relationships between all job classifications and positions within the city; other legislatively determined and projected demands on city resources, i.e., budgetary priorities that the city council has established; allowance for equitable compensation increases for other employees and employee groups for the corresponding fiscal period(s); revenue projections not to exceed currently authorized tax and rates for the relevant fiscal year(s); assurance of sufficient and sound budgetary reserves; and constitutional, statutory (and municipal code) limitations on the level and use of revenues and expenditures.
E.
If the dispute is not settled within thirty days after the appointment of the fact-finding panel, or, upon agreement by both parties within a longer period, the panel shall make findings of fact and recommend terms of settlement, which shall be advisory only. The fact-finders shall submit, in writing, any findings of fact and recommended terms of settlement to the parties before they are made available to the public. The city shall make these findings and recommendations publicly available within ten days after their receipt.
F.
As set forth in Government Code Section 3505.7, after any applicable mediation and fact-finding procedures have been exhausted, but no earlier than ten days after the fact-finders’ written findings of fact and recommended terms of settlement have been submitted to the parties pursuant to Government Code Section 3505.5, the city may, after holding a public hearing regarding the impasse, implement its last, best, and final offer, but shall not implement a memorandum of understanding. This subsection is not intended to grant any greater rights to the employee organizations than as set forth in Government Code Section 3505.7, as it may be amended from time to time.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
The cost for the services of a mediator and fact-finder or chairperson of a fact-finding panel utilized by the parties, and other mutually incurred costs of mediation and fact-finding, shall be borne equally by the city and exclusively recognized employee organization unless otherwise provided for by Government Code Section 3500 et seq. The cost for a fact-finding panel member selected by each party, and other separately incurred costs, shall be borne by such party.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
A.
When the meeting and conferring process is concluded between the city and a formally recognized employee organization representing a majority of the employees in an appropriate unit, all agreed upon matters shall be incorporated in a written memorandum of understanding signed by the duly authorized city and majority representatives.
B.
As to those matters within the authority of the city council, the memorandum of understanding shall be submitted to the city council for determination.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
This chapter shall be administered and construed as follows:
A.
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to deny to any person, employee, organization, the city, or any authorized officer, body or other representative of the city the rights, powers and authority granted by federal or state law (or San Pablo Municipal Code).
B.
This chapter shall be interpreted so as to carry out its purpose as set forth in Section 2.52.020.
C.
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as making the provisions of California Labor Code Section 923 applicable to city employees or employee organizations, or of giving employees or employee organizations the right to participate in, support, cooperate or encourage, directly or indirectly, any strike, sick-out or other total or partial stoppage or slowdown of work. In consideration of and as a condition of initial and continued employment by the city, employees recognize that any such actions by them are in violation of their conditions of employment except as expressly otherwise provided by legally preemptive state or contrary local law. In the event employees engage in such actions, they shall subject themselves to discipline up to and including termination, and may be replaced, to the extent such actions are not prohibited by preemptive law; and employee organizations may thereby forfeit rights accorded them under city law or contract.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)
If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter or any part thereof is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional or invalid or ineffective, by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this chapter or any part thereof. The city council declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more of these sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or invalid or ineffective.
(Ord. 2011-004 § 1 (part), 2011; Ord. 2012-001 § 1 (part), 2012)