A.
The purpose of this section is to set forth permit procedures and requirements for the preparation, filing, and processing of development applications required by this zoning code. The development review process is designed to provide a consistent and efficient method for the city to implement its general plan and other adopted goals, policies, and standards.
B.
Authority for Land Use Decisions. Table 11.14 identifies the review authority responsible for reviewing and making decisions on each type of planning application required by this zoning code.
Table 11.14 Review Authority | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type of Action | Code Section | Review Authority1 | |||
Planning Manager | DRC | Planning Commission | City Council | ||
General Plan Amendment | Recommend | — | Recommend | Decision | |
Zoning Code Amendment | 11-17-1 | Recommend | Recommend2 | Recommend | Decision |
Development Permit | 11-16-5 | Recommend | Recommend3 | Decision | Appeal |
Conditional Use Permit | 11-16-6 | Recommend | Recommend3 | Decision | Appeal |
Variance | 11-16-7 | Recommend | Recommend3 | Decision | Appeal |
Specific Plan1 | 11-16-9 | Recommend | — | Recommend | Decision |
Zoning Clearance | 11-16-4 | Decision4 | — | — | — |
Short Term Rental Permit | 11-12-30 | Decision | — | Appeal | Appeal |
Temporary Use Permit | 11-16-8 | Decision | — | Appeal | Appeal |
Interpretations | 11-2-5 | Decision | — | Appeal | Appeal |
Sign Permit | 11-13-12 | Recommend | Decision | — | Appeal |
Note: | |||||
1. | The review authority responsible for reviewing and making decisions on each type of permit shall be responsible for making any applicable CEQA determination. A CEQA determination may be appealed. | ||||
2. | The DRC shall provide a recommendation on amendments to all design standards, building form, etc. within Village Design District Overlay (DD-1) and the Mission Design District (DD-2). All other zoning code amendments do not require DRC recommendation. | ||||
3. | The DRC is to provide a recommendation for nonresidential and mixed-use applications where applications propose new construction or additions greater than 500 square feet. No DRC recommendation is required for residential projects, or conversions to residential where no exterior structural improvements are proposed. | ||||
4. | The planning manager's decision under a zoning clearance is a ministerial action and not subject to an appeal. | ||||
C.
Application Content. All planning applications shall be filed with the department on a city application form, together with all required fees and/or deposits, the indemnification agreement required by section 11-16-2, all other information and materials specified in the department's handouts and/or checklists submittal requirements for the specific type of application and any additional instructions provided by the planning manager. The department will prepare required forms and checklists.
D.
Application Review.
1.
Determination of Completeness. The planning manager or their designee shall review each application for completeness and accuracy before it is considered officially filed. The planning manager's determination of completeness shall be based on the department's submittal requirements, including checklists and any additional instructions provided by the planning manager.
a.
Notification of Applicant. As required by Government Code section 65943, not later than 30 calendar days after the filing of the application, the applicant shall be informed in writing that the application is complete and has been accepted for processing, or that the application is incomplete and that additional information shall be provided to complete the application process.
b.
Appeal of Determination. Where the planning manager has determined that an application is incomplete, and the applicant believes that the application is complete and/or that the information requested by the planning manager is not required, the applicant may appeal the determination in compliance with section 11-17-3 (Appeals).
c.
Time for Submittal of Additional Information. When an application is incomplete, the time used by the applicant to submit the required additional information shall not be considered part of the time within which the determination of completeness shall occur.
d.
Expiration of Application. If an applicant fails to provide the additional information specified in the incompleteness letter within one year of the notice of incomplete, the application shall expire and be deemed withdrawn. This section 11-16-1(D)(1)(4) shall not apply to formal SB 330 applications for housing development projects which are addressed in section 11-16-3(F).
e.
Environmental Information. After an application has been accepted as complete, the planning manager may require the applicant to submit additional information needed for the environmental review of the development.
E.
Application Fees.
1.
Fee Schedule. The council shall establish a schedule of fees for the processing of the applications required by this zoning code, which shall be listed in the City's Master Fee Schedule. Fees are intended to allow recovery of all costs incurred by the city in processing development applications.
2.
Timing of Payment. The city will not process an application until all required fees or deposits have been paid. If at any time during the review process deposits are insufficient to cover the city's costs of processing the application, the city shall cease processing until additional funds are submitted.
3.
Refunds and Withdrawals. Application fees cover city costs for public hearings, mailings, staff time, and the other activities involved in processing applications. Fees are not refundable in the event of denial by the review authority. In the case of a withdrawal, the planning manager may authorize a partial refund based upon the pro-rated costs to-date at the time of withdrawal.
F.
Eligibility to Submit an Application. An application may only be filed by the owner of the property, an authorized agent of the owner, a person acting in compliance with a purchase contract or other written consent, or the planning manager on behalf of the council. Proposed development on appurtenant easements that an applicant controls as identified by a title report shall not require signature of the underlying easement holder.
(Ord. 24-0378, 12/9/2024)