Actions and uses under this Title are grouped into categories, each with a corresponding review process as defined in YCC Section
16B.03.030. If an application does not meet minimum approval criteria or standards for the zone and this Title, or cannot be adequately conditioned at a particular location, it shall be denied. A project permit, other than a nonconforming use permit, may not be granted for a classified use in a zoning district from which it is specifically prohibited. Applications are categorized as follows:
(1) Type 1 Applications.
(a) The Administrative Official reviews applications subject to Type 1 review under the procedures of Section
19.30.090 and YCC Chapter
16B.03 for compliance with this Title.
(b) Applications requiring Type 1 review include:
(i) Boundary line adjustments;
(ii) Segregations within an approved binding site plan for commercial and industrial development;
(iii) Administrative modifications to existing or approved uses where authorized by this Title; and
(iv) Type 1 Permitted Uses shown on the Allowable Land Use Table 19.14-1 in Chapter
19.14, except when required to undergo Type 2 review under Subsection
(1)(c) below. The Reviewing Official shall use the procedures in YCC Subsection
16B.03.030(1)(a), Sections
19.30.080 and
19.30.090 to review Type 1 Permitted Uses and associated site improvements for compliance with the provisions and standards of the zoning district in which they are located.
(c) Type 1 Permitted Uses require Type 2 review when:
(i) All or part of the development, except for agricultural buildings, single-family dwellings and duplexes are in the 100-year floodplain or Greenway Overlay (GO);
(ii) All or part of a development that is in a Master Planned Development Overlay (MPDO) and is identified in a development agreement as requiring Type 2 approval;
(iii) The proposed use includes hazardous material, as defined in Section
19.01.070;
(iv) All or part of the development requires a modification to an existing development plan and/or master plan associated with a Master Planned Development Overlay;
(v) The Reviewing Official cannot determine from the application submitted that the use will meet the approval standards in Section
19.30.090; or
(vi) The permitted use could be approved subject to broader condition authority under Section
19.30.100.
(d) Type 1 Uses generally not subject to project review by the Administrative Official provided all applicable standards of this Title are met and/or when categorically exempt from environmental review under YCC Section
16.04.100, or for which environmental review has been completed in connection with other project permits, and when locating on an existing lot:
(i) Site-built or modular dwellings and two-family dwellings;
(ii) Manufactured home meeting requirements of Section
19.18.270;
(iii) Mobile or manufactured homes of any size in approved or existing mobile/manufactured home parks;
(iv) Multi-wide manufactured home in approved or existing manufactured home subdivisions;
(v) Single-wide manufactured home in approved or existing manufactured home subdivisions;
(vi) Single-wide manufactured home, on an individual lot meeting the criteria in Section
19.18.270;
(vii) Sales office within a residential or mixed-use project while units in the project are sold by the developer;
(viii) Garages and other accessory structures associated with (i) through (vii) above, but not including accessory dwelling units;
(x) Agriculture other than Animal Feeding Operations and Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, slaughterhouses and rendering plants, and sprayfields;
(xii) Structures used for storage of fuel or agricultural products;
(xiv) Irrigation distribution/drainage facilities, including impoundment of water, dams and frost ponds; and
(xv) Utility services (substations, reservoirs, etc.), when no building or series of buildings requires a building permit.
(2) Type 2 Applications.
(a) The Administrative Official (and the hearing examiner when such applications are referred by the Administrative Official under YCC §
19.14.010(2)) reviews applications subject to Type 2 review under the procedures of Section
19.30.100 and YCC Chapter
16B.03 for compliance with this Title as provided by YCC Subsection
16B.03.030(1)(b).
(b) Applications subject to Type 2 review include:
(i) Short plats and recorded short plat alterations/vacations that do not involve a public dedication [See Subsection
19.34.040(9)];
(ii) New binding site plans for commercial and industrial development;
(iii) Administrative adjustments to standards where authorized by this Title; and
(iv) Type 2 Administrative Uses shown on the Allowable Land Use Table 19.14-1 in Chapter
19.14 are generally allowed in the zoning district. The compatibility between a Type 2 Administrative Use and the surrounding environment cannot always be determined in advance. Therefore, a Type 2 Administrative Use may be conditioned to ensure compatibility and compliance with the provisions of the zoning district and the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
(3) Type 3 Applications.
(a) The Hearing Examiner reviews applications subject to Type 3 review under the procedures of Section
19.30.100 and YCC Subsection
16B.03.030(1)(c).
(b) Applications subject to Type 3 review include:
(ii) Non-conforming use expansions or alterations, other than residential structures and specified mining operations;
(iii) Plat vacations or alterations under Chapter
58.17 RCW;
(iv) Major modifications to a Master Development Plan;
(v) Type 3 review required for Type 2 Administrative Uses referred by the Administrative Official for Type 3 review and for other specific reviews established by this Title. Such referred reviews are subject to the criteria of 19.30.020(2)(b)(iv) for Type 2 uses; and
(vi) Uses shown on the Allowable Land Use Table 19.14-1 in Chapter
19.14, Type 3 Conditional Uses are not generally appropriate throughout the zoning district.
(4) Type 4 Quasi-Judicial Applications. Long Plat Applications, new or expanded Master Planned Developments in Urban Growth Areas, Master Planned Resorts (MPRs) in rural or resource areas, Minor Rezones or any other Type 4 use or development listed in the Allowable Land Use Table 19.14-1 found in Chapter
19.14 are subject to Type 4 review. The process for review of Type 4 applications shall be as set forth in YCC Subsection
16B.03.030(1)(d) and Section
19.30.080 and the process for Minor Rezone applications shall be as set forth in Section
19.36.030.
(5) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses may be permitted when a principal use has been established. Accessory uses are customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal use of a structure or site. Refer to Section
19.18.020 for regulations governing accessory uses.
(6) Existing Uses. Within the zoning districts established by this Title, or zoning district amendments that may later be adopted, there may exist uses that were legally established prior to the effective date of this Title or applicable amendment that are classified as a Type 1, 2, 3 or 4 use in a particular zoning district. Such uses shall be considered Existing Type 1, 2, 3 or 4 uses, and subject to the review standards pertaining thereto under current code. Previously approved uses may continue according to their conditions of approval, whether classified as existing or nonconforming. A change in classification as existing or nonconforming will be reviewed under its new classification at such time the use is altered, amended, modified or expanded.
(7) Prohibited Uses Production, Processing and Retailing of Marijuana Prohibited. Production, processing and retail sales of marijuana and marijuana-infused products, all as defined in Initiative Measure No. 502, as codified in the Revised Code of Washington Chapter
69.50, and implementing regulations in Chapter
314-55 of the Washington Administrative Code, are each prohibited and not allowed in any zone within the unincorporated areas of Yakima County.
(8) Development Permits for Master Planned Resorts. The Resort Development Plan authorized in conjunction with the rezone to MPR is the guide for development of the resort. Establishment of the uses identified in the Resort Development Plan shall be subject to Type 1 review, in order to conduct site-specific review of the individual uses.
(a) Establishment of land uses and any division of land by subdivision or condominium must be consistent with:
(ii) Any specific conditions or required mitigation measures;
(iii) SEPA review, including an environmental checklist; and
(iv) All necessary construction authorization permits.
(b) Components or phases of the authorized RDP may be submitted with other required approvals as a master application.
(Ord. 7-2013 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2015; Ord. 2-2022 § 3 (Exh. 1), 2022)