[Amended 6-12-2025 by L.L. No. 19-2025]
A.
The Legislature finds that the Suffolk County Department of Consumer Affairs has received numerous complaints from consumers about catering contracts. These contracts are very often executed long in advance of affairs, at the urging of caterers, to avoid scheduling disappointments.
B.
The Legislature further finds that, upon the execution of such a contract, a consumer is required to make an initial payment and may be required to make periodic payments thereafter.
C.
The Legislature further finds that those who cancel catering contracts, in most instances, do so for legitimate reasons. The major area of consumer complaints relates to these cancellations and the claims of patrons for restitution of these partial payments and, on the other hand, the caterers' claims to damages due to these cancellations.
D.
The Legislature further finds that the common "no return of deposit" clause too often results in an unconscionable and unjust situation because the caterer often rebooks the room for the contracted date at a price more or less than the original contract price but which has no bearing on the "no return of deposit" clause.
E.
The Legislature further finds that a caterer's delegation of its performance of the contract to another caterer without the consumer's consent is unconscionable.
F.
This Legislature further finds that caterers are sometimes left with an insufficient amount of time to resell a date after a cancellation and it is unreasonable to have an irrebuttable presumption that a caterer will be able to rebook an event of equal or greater value when a cancellation occurs at least six months before the originally scheduled date.
G.
This Legislature further finds that often events are booked as far as 18 months prior to the event date and this advance scheduling allows time for organizing the various components of such events and can provide a degree of certainty, particularly for a consumer, that a date is secured; thus such has become common in the industry.
H.
This Legislature further finds that while some sections of Chapter 365 provide protections for consumers and caterers alike, the manner in which it is currently constructed may cause caterers to be less competitive when compared to nearby counties.
I.
The Legislature intends to cure these inequities by establishing criteria and procedures for cancellation of catering contracts and for the delegating of these contracts.