The purpose of this chapter is to provide an expedited, streamlined solar permitting process that complies with California Government Code Section 65850.5 (known as the Solar Rights Act), in order to achieve timely and cost-effective installations of small residential rooftop solar energy systems. This chapter encourages the use of solar systems by removing unreasonable barriers, minimizing costs to property owners and the City and expanding the ability of property owners to install solar energy systems. This chapter allows the City to achieve these goals while protecting the public health and safety.
(Ord. 2026 § 1 (Exh. A), 2015; Ord. 2065 § 1(A), 2018)
The following words and phrases, whenever used in this chapter, shall be construed as defined in this section:
A. 
"Solar energy system"
means either of the following:
1. 
Any solar collector or other solar energy device whose primary purpose is to provide for the collection, storage, and distribution of solar energy for space heating, space cooling, electric generation, or water heating.
2. 
Any structural design feature of a building, whose primary purpose is to provide for the collection, storage, and distribution of solar energy for electricity generation, space heating or cooling, or for water heating.
B. 
"Small residential rooftop solar energy system"
means all of the following:
1. 
A solar energy system that is no larger than 10 kilowatts alternating current nameplate rating or 30 kilowatts thermal.
2. 
A solar energy system that conforms to all applicable state fire, structural, electrical, and other building codes as adopted or amended by the City, and all state and city health and safety standards.
3. 
A solar energy system that is installed on a single or duplex family dwelling.
4. 
A solar panel or module array that does not exceed the maximum legal building height as defined by the City's development code.
C. 
"Electronic submittal"
means the utilization of electronic email or submittal via the Internet.
D. 
"Specific, adverse impact"
means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified, and written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.
E. 
"Reasonable restrictions"
means those restrictions on a solar energy system that do not significantly increase the cost of the system or significantly decrease its efficiency or specified performance, or that allow for an alternative system of comparable cost, efficiency, and energy conservation benefits.
F. 
"Restrictions that do not significantly increase the cost of the system or decrease its efficiency or specified performance"
means:
1. 
For water heater systems or solar swimming pool heating systems: an amount exceeding 10 percent of the cost of the system, but in no case more than $1,000, or decreasing the efficiency of the solar energy system by an amount exceeding 10 percent, as originally specified and proposed.
2. 
For photovoltaic systems: an amount not to exceed $1,000 over the system cost as originally specified and proposed, or a decrease in system efficiency of an amount exceeding 10 percent as originally specified and proposed.
(Ord. 2026 § 1 (Exh. A), 2015; Ord. 2065 § 1(A), 2018)
A. 
This chapter applies to the permitting of all small residential rooftop solar energy systems in the City installed on single and duplex family homes.
B. 
Small residential rooftop solar energy systems legally established or permitted prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter are not subject to the requirements of this chapter unless physical modifications or alterations are undertaken that materially change the size, type, or components of a small rooftop energy system in such a way as to require a new permit. Routine operation and maintenance or like-kind replacements shall not require a new permit.
C. 
A use permit and/or architectural review may be required for properties on the City's list of historic resources as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director.
(Ord. 2026 § 1 (Exh. A), 2015; Ord. 2045 § 1(B), 2016; Ord. 2065 § 1(A), 2018)
A. 
All solar energy systems shall meet applicable health and safety standards and requirements imposed by the state of California and the City.
B. 
Solar energy systems for heating water in single-family residences and for heating water in commercial or swimming pool applications shall be certified by an accredited listing agency as defined by the California Plumbing and Mechanical Code.
C. 
Solar energy systems for producing electricity shall meet all applicable safety and performance standards established by the California Electrical Code, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories and, where applicable, rules of the Public Utilities Commission regarding safety and reliability.
(Ord. 2026 § 1 (Exh. A), 2015; Ord. 2065 § 1(A), 2018)
A. 
All documents required for the submission of an expedited solar energy system application shall be made available on the city website.
B. 
Electronic submittal of the required permit application and documents by email or the Internet shall be made available to all small residential rooftop solar energy system permit applicants.
C. 
The City's Community Development Director, or designee, shall adopt a standard plan and checklist of all requirements with which small residential rooftop solar energy systems shall comply to be eligible for expedited review which shall be made available to the public on the Internet and at City Hall. The small residential rooftop solar system permit process, standard plan(s), and checklist(s) shall substantially conform to recommendations for expedited permitting, including the checklist and standard plans contained in the most current version of the California Solar Permitting Guidebook adopted by the Governor's Office of Planning and Research.
(Ord. 2026 § 1 (Exh. A), 2015; Ord. 2045 § 1(B), 2016; Ord. 2065 § 1(A), 2018)
A. 
Expedited Review. The Community Development Director shall implement an administrative, nondiscretionary review process to expedite approval of small residential rooftop solar energy systems. The City shall issue a building permit, the issuance of which is nondiscretionary, on the same day for over-the-counter applications or within one to three business days for electronic applications upon receipt of a complete application that meets the requirements of the approved checklist and standard plan and which does not require application for a zoning use permit pursuant to subsection B of this section. At a minimum, expedited permit review process shall conform to the following requirements:
1. 
If an application is deemed incomplete, a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional information or documentation required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance shall be sent to the applicant for resubmission.
2. 
Only one inspection shall be required and performed by the building and safety division for small residential rooftop solar energy systems eligible for expedited review. The inspection shall be done in a timely manner and should include consolidated inspections. If a small residential rooftop solar energy system fails inspection, a subsequent inspection is authorized.
B. 
Zoning Use Permit Applications. If the City finds, based on substantial evidence, that the solar energy system could have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety, the City may require an applicant to apply for a zoning use permit, as described in Chapter 9.03 LDC, including the additional following requirements:
1. 
Review of the application shall be limited to the City's review of whether the application meets local, state, and federal health and safety requirements.
2. 
The City may deny such application if it makes written findings, based upon substantive evidence in the record, that the proposed installation would have a specific, adverse impact upon public health or safety and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact. Such findings shall include the basis for the rejection of the potential feasible alternative for preventing the adverse impact.
3. 
Any condition imposed on an application shall be designed to mitigate the specific, adverse impact upon health and safety at the lowest possible cost. "A feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact" includes, but is not limited to, any cost-effective method, condition, or mitigation imposed by the City on another similarly situated application in a prior successful application for a permit. The City shall use its best efforts to ensure that the selected method, condition, or mitigation meets the conditions of subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 714 of the Civil Code defining restrictions that do not significantly increase the cost of the system or decrease its efficiency or specified performance.
C. 
Appeals. Appeal of a denial of any permit required by this section may be made by the permit applicant pursuant to the procedures set forth at Chapters 9.15 and 9.17 LDC, treated in the same manner as an appeal of a decision of the Community Development Director, other than the following exceptions to those provisions:
1. 
Appeals shall be made to the Planning Commission and the determination by the Planning Commission shall be final and not further appealable within the City.
2. 
The only required public notice of an appeal hearing shall be the same type of public notice required by the California Government Code to be provided in advance of a meeting of the Planning Commission. Publication and posting of notice pursuant to LDC 9.17.020(B)(3) is specifically not required.
3. 
In addition to the requirements contained at Chapters 9.15 and 9.17 LDC, to prevail upon an appeal, the appellant must show cause, on the grounds specified in the notice of appeal, why the action excepted to is not supported by substantial evidence. This standard requires the City's appealed action be upheld unless the appellant demonstrates that no reasonable person could reach the challenged permit determination based on the entire record existing at the time the permit determination was made.
4. 
To the extent any provisions of Chapters 9.03, 9.15, or 9.17 LDC conflict with appeal procedures stated in this chapter, the provisions in the municipal code shall govern.
(Ord. 2026 § 1 (Exh. A), 2015; Ord. 2045 § 1(B), 2016; Ord. 2065 § 1(A), 2018)