(A)
The Board of Supervisors finds that Santa Cruz County faces an affordable housing crisis in that:
(1)
The UC Santa Cruz-based No Place Like Home Project surveyed 1,700 renters in Santa Cruz County in 2017 and found that 70 percent of renters surveyed were "rent-burdened" and spent more than 30 percent of their net income on housing; specifically noting that renters in Westside Santa Cruz, Beach Flats, Live Oak, and Watsonville spent 60 to 76 percent of their household income on housing costs.
(2)
Santa Cruz County had the fourth-highest rate of people experiencing homelessness per total county residents in California, as reported in the 2019 point-in-time count.
(3)
Eighty-one percent of very low-income and 92 percent of extremely low-income households are paying more than 30 percent of their income on housing costs compared to the income spent by moderate-income (35 percent) and above moderate-income households (five percent), as highlighted in the 2021 Santa Cruz County Housing Affordability Needs Report (SCCHANR).
(4)
The National Low Income Housing Coalition has ranked Santa Cruz County as the second-most expensive rental market in the nation and the least affordable county in California for the average renter, given that four full-time jobs at minimum wage are needed to afford a two-bedroom unit at fair market rent in 2022.
(5)
The ATTOM U.S. Home Affordability Report (Q1—2022) ranked Santa Cruz County as the least affordable homeownership housing market in the United States, with neighboring Monterey County ranked as the seventh-least affordable county in the nation.
(B)
The Board of Supervisors finds that the lack of adequate affordable housing development in the community coupled with low vacancy rates and rents far beyond the means of most renters creates significant housing stress on households in Santa Cruz County.
(C)
The Board of Supervisors finds that due to the lack of affordable housing in the community, landlords have been known to rent substandard units to lessees or fail to maintain rental units in accordance with health and safety requirements. Tenants who lawfully organize to advocate for affordable rents and/or tenants' rights, including, but not limited to, addressing inadequate or substandard living conditions, decreased services as outlined in the lease agreement, or evictions, often face the risk of retaliatory eviction which may result in homelessness or other hardships to the lessee.
(D)
The Board of Supervisors finds that lessees who are unlawfully evicted from their dwellings confront significant difficulties and expenses in finding other permanent affordable housing. The lack of affordable housing alternatives leads to overcrowding which itself may result in health and safety problems. Further, after being displaced, low- and moderate-income tenants have difficulty finding affordable housing, given the increased financial burden or inability to afford the up-front security deposit and first and last month's rent at a new location.
(E)
The Board of Supervisors finds that efforts to prevent and end homelessness in Santa Cruz County will remain challenging in an environment of low rental unit vacancy rates, high rents, mean renter incomes inadequate to pay for annually increasing housing costs, and unaddressed unlawful evictions.
(F)
The Board of Supervisors finds that lessors who evict their lessees in retaliation for their exercise of rights protected under this chapter or in order to harass their tenant should bear responsibility for the hardship their actions create for the lessees.
(G)
The Board of Supervisors finds that while existing State law provides some protection to a tenant facing retaliation or harassment, the remedies available may not provide adequate compensation for all of the damages or losses the tenant may suffer.
(H)
The Board of Supervisors finds that protecting the efforts of tenants and tenant organizations to lawfully advocate for affordable rents or lessees' rights can be an effective means of preserving the County's affordable housing stock and should be protected.
(I)
The Board of Supervisors finds that the protections provided in this chapter provide greater benefits than those set forth in California Civil Code Section 1946.2 or are more restrictive in areas relating to unlawful evictions, protections for lessees against retaliation and harassment, and other tenant protections that are not preempted or otherwise precluded by any other provision of law.
(J)
The purposes of this chapter are to promote long-term stability and certainty for tenants in the rental market while providing landlords an ability to receive a fair return on their property, further preserving and protecting the County's affordable housing stock. The provisions outlined in this chapter are not meant to inhibit a landlord's lawful exercise of a right of eviction consistent with the obligations of a lease and the requirements of law.
(Ord. 5410 § 2, 2022)