A.
The city finds that lot size averaging is an appropriate regulatory approach to help protect critical areas and allow for greater flexibility in design so irregular parcels can be used more efficiently.
B.
Lot size averaging is an approach to dividing land that allows a parcel to be divided such that some of the resulting lots are smaller than the minimum lot size required in the applicable zone, as long as the average of all of the lot sizes, including open space and stormwater detention/retention areas, remains equal to or above the minimum lot size.
C.
The total number of lots in a development implementing lot size averaging cannot exceed the maximum number of lots allowed on the subject property per the applicable zone if averaging was not being used.
D.
Lot size averaging does not assure that the number of lots available to a developer on a particular parcel will be the same as the number available if the property were not encumbered by critical area exclusions.
E.
Lot size averaging is primarily concerned with allowing smaller lot sizes to account for critical areas and other site constraints, whereas Cluster Subdivision, as described in 19.46, addresses site constraints by providing more flexibility in dimensional standards and lot configuration. Both systems still maintain a standard gross density across the entire parcel but use different mechanisms to achieve this goal. Either system may be used.
(Ord. 1144-12 § 2 (Exh. A); Ord. 1284-17 § 2 (Exh. B); Ord. 1353-21 § 2 (Att. A); Ord. 1420-25, 7/24/2025)