This section provides direction for the design of buildings consistent with the goals and policies of the Mountlake Terrace Comprehensive Plan. See the individual "purpose" statements for each section in this chapter.
(Ord. 2755 § 3 (Exh. B), 2019)
Figure 19.123.240(B) Tower design examples. Building 1 includes substantial podium with a curved tower that includes vertical articulation on one side. Building 2 includes a number of massing offsets with changes in fenestration that lend interest and depth to the façade. Building 3 also uses a number of massing offsets and material/fenestration changes to add visual interest. All buildings have a strong ground-level emphasis. |
Figure 19.123.240(C)(2) Facade articulation examples. Both buildings use a combination of window patterns, weather protection features, and vertical piers to effectively articulate the facade. |
Figure 19.123.240(D) Illustrating maximum facade length standards and good and bad examples. | |
|---|---|
Less than 140' long: Meets standard | More than 140' long: Does not meet standard |
Building incorporates a courtyard along the facade (technique #1 noted above) to effectively break it up into smaller components: Meets standard. | |
The left building uses technique # 1 (vertical building modulation at least six-feet deep and 15 feet wide). The right building uses technique #2 (contrasting vertical modulated design component) together with different window fenestration designs on each side. Both examples are effective in breaking up the perceived scale of the building and adding visual interest. | |
Figure 19.123.250(B)(1) Examples of decorative or specially designed windows and entries. Examples of decorative or specially designed windows and entries. Upper left (b) = openable storefront window. Center top (a) = transom windows. Upper right (e) = openable window with decorative details. Lower left (e) = decorative window shades. Bottom middle (d) = Decorative door. Bottom right (c) = recessed entry. |
Figure 19.123.250(B)(2) Examples of attached elements that enhance the visual intrigue of the building. Examples of elements attached to facades that enhance the visual intrigue of the building. Upper left (a) = retractable awning. Top center (d) = custom hanging bike rack and repair station integrated as a storefront design element. Upper right (b) = decorative lighting fixtures. Lower left and middle (a) = custom decorative canopy. Lower right (c) decorative tower. |
Figure 19.123.250(D) Examples of buildings employing confident and distinctive rooflines. |
Building 1 uses a dramatic overhanging cornice at the corner. Building 2 uses a simple glass railing and an upper level building stepback. Building 3 uses a dramatic overhanging cornice line. Building 4 uses a “V” shaped roofline on its penthouse floor. Building 5 uses a highly articulated roofline with stepped overhangs. |
Buildings 6 and 7 simply appear to end without any statement of confidence and do not meet the standard. |
Figure 19.123.260(B)(1) Acceptable concrete block use/design. | |
|---|---|
Building 1 uses smooth-faced CMU as a contrasting feature that helps to highlight the main building entry. The simple design helps to add emphasis to the doors, canopy and decorative sconce lights. | Building 2 illustrates an acceptable departure example, as CMU is used as the primary cladding material. Note the use of beige split facade CMUs above each of the awnings and coupled with the use of smooth-faced gray CMUs on the vertical columns (which employ black accent tiles for added interest). |
Figure 19.123.260(B)(2) Acceptable metal siding examples. Buildings 1 and 2 successfully use metal siding more as an accent element to help articulate the facade. Metal siding is the primary material for Buildings 3 and 4, both of which integrate subtle changes in color to go with articulation features and design details. |
Figure 19.123.260(B)(3) Acceptable and unacceptable EIFS examples. Buildings 1 and 2 mix EIFS with brick and other materials and integrate trim details around windows to add a sense of depth to the facade. Building 3 uses EIFS is between the window and sidewalk – this design is prohibited. Building 4 uses EIFS as the primary siding material, which is prohibited. |
Figure 19.123.260(B)(4) Acceptable and unacceptable cementitious wall board examples. The above building uses cementitious wall board in different textures and colors to help articulate the facade. The white color replicates the board and batten style in the left image and green color in the right image effectively replicates horizontal wood siding. |
The wall board panels covering a large area in a single color would not meet the purpose of the standards. The right image is a better example and combines larger panels (dark maroon color) with horizontal wall board siding (beige color) as effective articulation features. |
Figure 19.123.270(C) Blank wall treatment examples. Buildings 1 – 3 feature acceptable treatments including a combination of high quality materials and landscaping (1), decorative lighting/sculptural element (2), and decorative artwork. The display cases in Building 4 don't meet the 16" depth requirement, nor do they meet the purpose of the standards. |
Figure 19.123.270(D) Acceptable firewall design where visible to the public. The left images uses a combination of paint bands and ivy to enhance the appearance of this large exposed firewall. The building in the right image uses simple scoring patterns and change in materials and color on part of the top floor to add visual interest. |