A.
The city council is desirous of implementing the general plan for the city, subject general plan having been reviewed and updated by the city planning commission and city council during 1979-1980 with an approval of the revised plan being given by the planning commission on October 10, 1979 (Resolution No. 1979-16), and subsequently adopted by the city council on January 22, 1980 (Resolution No. 1980-N-1).
B.
The general plan for the city contains the following policy for new development: "It is the policy of the City of Vacaville that adequate public facilities should be provided for new urban development and that such new developments should bear their 'fair share' cost of providing such facilities."
C.
The city council has previously received, reviewed and approved a large number of development proposals and applications within the boundaries of the Vacaville Unified and Travis Unified School Districts. During public hearings and studies related to these development submissions, information has been brought to the attention of the city council which indicates many of these projects have, and will continue to, generate extensive economic and population overload impacts upon this school district which may seriously affect the quality of education of our community.
D.
The city council therefore is presently confronted with the dilemma of reviewing additional proposed developments as to their consistency with the general plan and finding that public facilities, i.e., required school sites and available classroom capacity, are apparently inadequate in this school district.
E.
Officials from the boards of education of the Vacaville Unified and Travis Unified School Districts have formally appeared before this council appealing for assistance in resolving the adverse impacts that rapid residential development is having on the districts. These official appeals have included requests for the city council to deny or defer approval of new residential development applications until additional monetary resources are acquired for the acquisition of additional school sites and for increasing classroom capacity.
F.
The city council has considered and discussed the alternatives available to mitigate school overcrowding such as the adoption of a comprehensive growth management system, temporary or long-term moratoriums on further residential development, and/or temporary classroom provisions by residential developers, where applicable.
G.
As a temporary solution to the impacts caused by rapid residential development, the council has concluded that this chapter is essential to protect the public health, safety and general welfare.
H.
This chapter constitutes an extension of the provisions of Ordinance No. 1135 which provided for School District Residential Development Impact Fees within the Vacaville Unified School District. This chapter additionally provides for School District Residential Impact Fees within the Travis Unified School District.
(Ord. 1230 § 2(part), 1984)