The City Council of the City of Vacaville finds as follows:
A.
Pursuant to Chapter XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City of Vacaville may make and enforce all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws.
B.
Pursuant to Section 38771 of the California Government Code, the City of Vacaville may declare what activities or conditions may constitute a nuisance.
C.
Pursuant to Section 19803 of the California Business and Professions Code, the City of Vacaville may impose more stringent local controls or conditions upon gambling activities that are permitted under applicable state law.
D.
It is a goal of the City Council to establish Vacaville as a unique and distinctive place, with a high quality of life in an attractive, secure environment for the City's residents and businesses.
E.
Businesses describing themselves as business centers and Internet cafes have opened across the state, which promote the sale of products and services by offering entries into a sweepstakes, the results of which may be revealed in several ways, including by playing games on the business's computers. Patrons can select from multiple games, many of which have the appearance of casino-style games of chance, such as slot machines. Winning sweepstakes entries may be redeemed at the business for cash or cash equivalent payouts.
F.
On January 1, 2015, Assembly Bill 1439 went into effect, which provided that businesses engaged in or offering a sweepstakes-like promotion revealed through an electronic video monitor to simulate gambling or play gambling-themed games in order to increase the sale of their products or services are engaged in an illegal activity.
G.
Following the passage of Assembly Bill 1439, some businesses engaged in sweepstakes promotions changed the operation of their simulated gaming devices by adding a game of skill component prior to the award of any prizes under the gambling-themed sweepstakes games. This change is a thinly veiled attempt to evade Assembly Bill 1439 by invoking the "pinball exception" to illegal gambling pursuant to Section 330b(f) of the California Penal Code. Section 330b(f) provides that pinball and other amusement machines or devices which are predominantly games of skill do not constitute an illegal slot machine. The addition of a so-called "game of skill" component does not materially alter the nature of devices that offer sweepstakes promotions nor does it alleviate adverse secondary effects generated by such devices.
H.
Businesses that utilize simulated gambling devices present unique challenges for local government. These businesses provide the allure of traditional gambling by offering gambling-based video games and cash prizes, whereas it is not always clear under state law whether a particular business is engaged in illegal gambling and/or unlawful promotional sweepstakes.
I.
Many of the negative community impacts that might be expected from a business establishment that provides simulated gambling devices have manifested themselves in the City of Vacaville and neighboring cities, including a significant increase in police calls for service related to criminal activity such as theft, robbery, fighting, illegal drug activity, public intoxication, narcotics offenses, vandalism, property damage, burglary, robbery, loitering, trespassing, disturbing the peace, and other criminal activity. The increased demand for police resources to address these activities significantly reduces the Police Department's ability to respond to other emergencies and to be proactive elsewhere within the City.
J.
The City of Vacaville has received numerous complaints from community members and business establishments voicing concern over businesses which they perceive as "gambling houses" operating within the City.
K.
The intent of the City Council in adopting this chapter is to protect public health, safety and welfare by prohibiting broadly the possession or use of simulated gambling devices, including any related activity or behavior which can be reasonably construed to be the use of simulated gambling devices. The City Council in prohibiting simulated gambling devices in no way intends to approve the use of actual slot machines, other forms of casino gambling or other types of gambling devices that may be regulated pursuant to state law. In addition, this prohibition is aimed directly at devices that simulate gambling activity, regardless of whether the devices or the simulations in and of themselves can be said to constitute gambling as that term may be defined elsewhere.
(Ord. 1889, Added, 08/25/2015)