The City Council hereby finds, determines and declares that:
a)
Solicitations made in an aggressive manner are unsafe and disruptive to persons in the City of Norco and are a threat to public health, safety, and general welfare. Aggressive solicitations typically include approaching or following pedestrians, the use of abusive language, unwanted physical contact, or the intentional blocking of pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
b)
An increase in aggressive solicitation throughout the City has become extremely disturbing and disruptive to residents and businesses, and has contributed not only to the loss of access to and enjoyment of public places, but also to an enhanced sense of fear, intimidation, and disorder.
c)
Aggressive solicitation from people in places where they are a "captive audience" in which it is impossible or difficult for them to exercise their own right to decline to listen to or to avoid solicitation from others is problematic, detracts from the rights of persons in the City to quietly enjoy public facilities, and presents a risk to the health, safety and welfare of the public. Such places include public transportation vehicles and their designated locations for stops, as well as gas stations.
d)
The presence of individuals who solicit money from persons at or near banks or automated teller machines is especially threatening and dangerous. Such activity often carries with it an implicit threat to both person and property. Restricting solicitation in such places will provide balance between the rights of solicitors and the rights of persons who wish to decline or avoid such solicitations, and will help avoid or diminish the threat of violence in such unwarranted and unavoidable confrontations.
e)
Aggressive solicitation on roadway median strips, at traffic intersections and in the public roadway, and lingering and loitering on a median are unsafe and hazardous for solicitors, drivers, pedestrians, and the general public. Aggressive soliciting on roadway median strips, at traffic intersections, and in the public roadway increases the risk of drivers becoming distracted from their primary duty to safely operate their motor vehicle and watch traffic. This may result in traffic collisions, congestion and blockage of streets, and delay the free flow of travel, all of which constitute substantial traffic safety concerns.
f)
The Council's intent in enacting this chapter is not to interfere with the exercise of First Amendment rights of those engaged in solicitation on roadway median strips, at traffic intersections, and in the public roadway, and lingering and loitering on the medians. This is meant to minimize the safety hazards of those in such areas as well as the drivers and passengers in vehicles sharing the roadway.
g)
The practice of aggressive solicitation near driveways accessing shopping centers, retail, and business establishments is unsafe and hazardous for solicitors, drivers, pedestrians, and the general public. The location of the solicitor near the driveway compromises the solicitor's safety, impedes visibility, and impairs the driver's ability to safely enter and exit. Drivers also become distracted from their duty to operate their motor vehicle and watch traffic, which may result in traffic collisions, congestion and blockage of streets, and delay the free flow of travel, all of which constitute substantial traffic safety concerns.
h)
The restrictions of this chapter are content-neutral and are narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest, but still provide alternative avenues of communication.
i)
The reasonable time, place and manner restrictions in this chapter avoid the negative effects of aggressive solicitation and solicitation in unsafe places and will not unreasonably restrict free speech of people engaged in solicitation.
(Ord. 1014 Sec. 1, 2017)