A.
Authority to file.
(1)
Pursuant to NYS General Town Law and the Town of Clarkson Code and all applicable provisions of this chapter, this chapter may be amended, supplemented, and repealed.
(2)
Amendments to the text or map of this zoning code may be initiated by the Town Board, Planning Board, or by a petition by property owners as provided by NYS General Town Law.
C.
Public hearing. A public hearing shall be held by the Town Board for all proposed amendments.
E.
Review procedure.
(1)
Each application shall be referred to the Planning Board. The Planning Board shall report its recommendations thereon to the Town Board, accompanied by a full statement of the reasons for such recommendations.
(2)
If the Planning Board fails to report within a period of 62 days from the date of receipt of notice or such longer time as may have been agreed upon by it and the Town Board, the Town Board may act without such report.
(3)
After receiving the report of the Planning Board, the Town Board shall issue a decision on the proposed amendment within 62 days. The Town Board may also return the application to the Planning Board for further consideration, together with a written explanation of the reasons for doing so.
(4)
The Town Board may act by a simple majority vote, except when a valid protest petition has been submitted in accordance with NYS Law. In the case of a valid protest petition, approval requires a three-fourths vote of the members of the Town Board.
(5)
If the Town Board approves the amendment, supplement, change or modification to the zoning code or zoning map, as applicable, shall be amended after publication and filing with the Town Clerk, County Clerk, and Secretary of State as required by NYS Law.
F.
Review criteria. In reviewing and making decisions on zoning amendments, the reviewing body may consider the following criteria, as applicable:
(1)
Whether the proposed amendment corrects an error or inconsistency in the zoning code or meets the challenge of a changing condition;
(2)
Whether the proposed amendment is in substantial conformance with the adopted plans and policies of the municipality;
(3)
Whether the proposed amendment is in the best interests of the municipality as a whole;
(4)
Whether public facilities (infrastructure) and services will be adequate to serve development allowed by any requested rezoning;
(5)
Whether any rezoning will substantially harm the public health, safety or general welfare or the value of nearby properties;
(6)
Whether any rezoning is compatible with the zoning and use of adjacent property;
(7)
Whether the property in question is suitable for the uses and development to which it has been restricted under the existing zoning regulations; and
(8)
Whether the gain, if any, to the public health, safety and general welfare due to denial of the application outweighs that of the hardship imposed upon the landowner, if any, as a result of denial of the application.